Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover in situ study evaluated the enamel remineralization potential and fluoride bioavailability of three dentifrices-one fluoride-free negative control, one positive control with 0.243% sodium fluoride, and one investigational dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride and 20% sodium bicarbonate. Healthy adult subjects wore a palatal acrylic appliance containing demineralized enamel specimens for three 9-day treatment periods, during which in vivo brushing/slurry exposure and ex vivo sucrose challenges were performed. Outcomes included percent surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) and post-treatment enamel fluoride concentration.
This in situ intraoral appliance (IOA) model evaluates anticaries potential by exposing demineralized enamel specimens to oral conditions while allowing for ex vivo treatment assessments. Subjects wore acrylic palatal appliances containing four enamel specimens covered with steel gauze to promote plaque formation. Each of the three treatment periods lasted nine days and included twice-daily toothbrushing and dentifrice slurry swishing, plus three daily sucrose challenges. A minimum 4-day fluoride-free washout preceded each period. Post-treatment specimens were analyzed for %SMHR and enamel fluoride concentration.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative Control Toothpaste | Placebo Comparator | Fluoride-free dentifrice (0 ppm fluoride). Used for twice-daily brushing and slurry swishing during each test day. |
|
| Comparator | Active Comparator |
| |
| Test Toothpaste | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative Control Toothpaste | Drug | Fluoride-free toothpaste |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) [Time Frame: End of each 9-day test period (three test periods in total)] | End of each 9#day test period (three test periods in total) | |
| Post-treatment fluoride concentration (µg F/g enamel) | End of each 9-day test period (three test periods in total |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Annahita Ghassemi, PhD | Church & Dwight, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therametric Technologies, Inc. | Noblesville | Indiana | 46060 | United States |
The sponsor does not plan to share individual participant data (IPD) from this study. Summary results will be provided as required, but no de-identified datasets or additional supporting documents will be made available.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003731 | Dental Caries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017001 | Tooth Demineralization |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Active Comparator |
| Drug |
Commercially available fluoride toothpaste |
|
| Test Toothpaste | Drug | lnvestigational fluoride toothpaste |
|