Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is designed to compare standard anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft with ACL reconstruction augmented using the Tape Active Reconstruction System (TARS). Eligible patients aged 18 to 44 years with a complete ACL rupture will be prospectively enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two study groups. Participants will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at regular follow-up visits, with the final assessment performed at 12 months after surgery. Outcome assessments will include patient-reported outcome measures, objective clinical examination of knee stability, instrumented laxity measurements, and radiological evaluation.
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed procedures in sports orthopaedic surgery. Although standard hamstring autograft reconstruction provides good clinical outcomes, residual anterior knee laxity and graft failure remain concerns, particularly in young and active patients. Augmentation using the Tape Active Reconstruction System (TARS) has been introduced as an adjunct technique intended to share load with the graft during the early healing phase and potentially improve postoperative stability.
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether ACL reconstruction augmented using TARS results in superior clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes compared with standard ACL reconstruction alone. The study will prospectively collect demographic, clinical, functional, and imaging data and analyze the relationship between surgical technique and postoperative outcomes. Patients will be evaluated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Assessments will include objective knee stability testing using the KT-1000 arthrometer, clinical examination (Lachman and pivot shift tests), functional outcome scores, and radiological evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including T2 mapping sequences, will be performed at 1 year to evaluate graft maturation, and integration.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard ACL Reconstruction | Active Comparator | Patients will undergo single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction using a quadrupled hamstring (semitendinosus) autograft. Femoral and tibial fixation will be performed using adjustable cortical suspension devices according to standard surgical techniques. |
|
| TARS-Augmented ACL Reconstruction | Experimental | Patients will undergo the same standard ACL reconstruction procedure with augmentation using the Tape Active Reconstruction System (TARS). Within the TARS technique, high-strength suture tape is applied to provide load sharing and graft protection during the early rehabilitation period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACL Reconstruction | Procedure | ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus tendon autograft |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Side to side difference in anterior tibial translation (mm) | Anterior tibial translation measured by (Knee laxity Testing device) KT-1000 Arthrometer. | Preoperative and 12 months postoperatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score | Patient reported outcome measures of symptoms, sports activity & knee function. 0-100 points with 0 (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms) | 12 months |
| Marx Activity Rating Scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsun University | Recruiting | Samsun | Samsun | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38617885 | Background | Smith PA, Daniel AV, Stensby JD, Cook CS, Wijdicks CA. Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation: Safe Results Based on Minimum 2-Year Follow-up MRI. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Apr 11;12(4):23259671241239275. doi: 10.1177/23259671241239275. eCollection 2024 Apr. | |
| 35425845 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective randomized controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Participant- and assessor-blinded trial
| TARS-Augmented ACL Reconstruction | Procedure | Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction using a quadrupled semitendinosus tendon autograft was performed with additional Tape Active Reconstruction System (TARS) augmentation. High-strength suture tape was applied to provide load sharing during early rehabilitation. The postoperative rehabilitation protocol was identical to the control group. |
|
Patient-reported outcome measure of participation in high-demand sports activities, assessing the frequency of running, cutting, decelerating, and pivoting movements. Scores range from 0 to 16, with 0 indicating no participation in these activities and 16 indicating very frequent participation in pivoting and impact activities. |
| 12 months |
| Radiological assessment using MRI for graft maturation and integration | Graft maturation was assessed using MRI with T2 mapping sequences, and T2 values were measured at intra-articular graft regions using standardized regions of interest. Graft integration was assessed according to the Ge et al. grading system (Grade 1-3) based on the quality of graft-bone interface integration | 12 months |
| Kitchen BT, Mitchell BC, Cognetti DJ, Siow MY, Howard R, Carroll AN, Bastrom TP, Edmonds EW. Outcomes After Hamstring ACL Reconstruction With Suture Tape Reinforcement in Adolescent Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Apr 8;10(4):23259671221085577. doi: 10.1177/23259671221085577. eCollection 2022 Apr. |