Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a low-power holmium laser works to treat large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones in adults. It will also learn about the safety of the low-wattage holmium laser. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is the low-power holmium laser effective at treating large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones? Is the low-power holmium laser effective safe to use in adults? How does the low-power holmium laser compare to electrohydraulic lithotripsy for the management of large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones.
Participants will:
Undergo ERCP procedure and their bile duct or pancreatic duct stone will either be broken up with the low-power holmium laser lithotripsy device or the electrohydraulic lithotripsy lithotripsy device.
Answer a call 30 days after the procedure to document symptoms and/or any side effects.
This study aims to assess two main questions. 1: Whether low-wattage holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy (using the Quanta System Litho EVO device) is safe and effective in the management large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones. 2: Whether low-wattage holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy is non-inferior to electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the management of large and/or difficult gallstones.
Part one of the study will investigate whether utilizing the low-wattage holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy device via single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC-LL) is safe and effective to treat large and/or difficult choledocholithiasis or pancreaticolithiasis.
Part two of the study will be a non-inferiority study to determine if SOC-LL is non-inferior for stone clearance, among other secondary outcomes, compared to electrohydraulic lithotripsy via single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC-EHL).
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will undergo ERCP procedures and will either undergo SOC-LL or SOC-EHL to treat their large and/or difficult choledocholithiasis or pancreaticolithiasis. Stone clearance and other procedural or safety measures will be assessed after the procedure. The patient will be monitored after the procedure for adverse events and the administration of medications or admission to the hospital will be determined by the proceduralist. Roughly 30 days after the procedure the patient will be called to assess for any adverse effects as well as to determine symptom resolution.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laser Lithotripsy | Experimental | Laser lithotripsy (LL). Use of LL to break down large/difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones. |
|
| Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy | Active Comparator | Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL). Use of EHL to break down large/difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laser lithotripsy with low-wattage holmium laser | Device | Use of low-wattage holmium laser for lithotripsy of large and/or difficult bile duct stones or pancreatic duct stones during ERCP. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Complete stone clearance | Complete stone clearance is defined as the lithotripsy and clearance of ductal stone fragments as confirmed on cholangiogram or pancreaticogram at the end of the index/first procedure of the study. | Immediately after the procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall complete stone clearance rate | This describes the rate of complete stone clearance at the end of the final procedure required to completely clear stones, regardless of the number of procedures required to do so. | Immediately after the final procedure |
| Number of procedures |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 19-85 years
Signed written informed consent.
Presence of one or more biliary (common bile duct or intrahepatic) or pancreatic duct stones that are deemed "difficult" based on at least one of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neal A Mehta, MD | Contact | 3129428651 | neal_a_mehta@rush.edu | |
| Amanda Lin, DSc, CCRC | Contact | Amanda_F_Lin@rush.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Neal A Mehta, MD | Rush University Medical Center, Department of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Center for Interventional and Therapeutic Endoscopy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rush University Medical Center | Recruiting | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30979521 | Background | ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Sultan S, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, Cortessis VK, Schilperoort H, Kysh L, Matsuoka L, Yachimski P, Agrawal D, Gurudu SR, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Khashab MA, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Sawhney MS, Thosani N, Yang J, Wani SB. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1075-1105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Study will stay at Rush no plan for multiple centers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
EHL vs. Laser lithotripsy for choledocholithiasis or pancreaticolithiasis. Single-blind RCT.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Electrohydraulic lithotripsy | Device | Use of electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of large and/or difficult bile duct or pancreatic duct stones. |
|
|
Describes the number of ERCP procedures required to achieve complete stone clearance. |
| Immediately after the final procedure |
| Total procedure time | Total duration of index ERCP procedure. Will also document total procedural time for all necessary ERCPs to achieve stone clearance. | Immediately after the final procedure |
| Total lithotripsy time | Duration of the activation time for either the laser lithotripsy or the electrohydraulic lithotripsy devices during the study duration. | Immediately after the final procedure |
| Rate of rescue mechanical lithotripsy | Describes the percentage/rate of time that the patient requires rescue mechanical lithotripsy after failure of the primary modality (SOC-LL or SOC-EHL). | Immediately after the final procedure |
| Length of post-procedure hospital stay | Describes the amount of time in days the patient spent in the hospital after any and all required procedures to achieve complete stone clearance. | Immediately after the final procedure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D042883 | Choledocholithiasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003137 | Common Bile Duct Diseases |
| D001649 | Bile Duct Diseases |
| D001660 | Biliary Tract Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D002769 | Cholelithiasis |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017602 | Lithotripsy, Laser |
| D008096 | Lithotripsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053685 | Laser Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D055011 | Ablation Techniques |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D059708 | Ultrasonic Surgical Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided