Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of IH after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) open repair according to the abdominal wall closure technique used. The main question it aims to answer is: Does prophylactic mesh reinforcement prevents from IH after AAA open repair?
Patients were divided in 2 groups, fascial closure with small bites and prophylactic mesh reinforcement (Group A); and primary fascial closure with small bites alone (Group B) and were performed a clinical examination at least once within the first 24 post-operative months, where the clinical diagnosis of IH could be evaluated.
This study included patients treated for AAA between January 2019 and December 2021 in our institution.
Two groups were evaluated, group A where patients were treated by small-bites closure plus PMR (onlay mesh) and group B where patients received primary closure with small-bites alone.
The surgeries were performed as per standard of care in our department, and the decision to use the onlay mesh was per surgeon discretion.
The main variable of study was the presence of incisional hernia evaluated by both clinical and image examination (at least once within the first 24 post-operative months). Patients included in the study that had any post-operative CT scan for any reason were evaluated and diagnosed with that imaging technique.For remaining patients, one radiologist with experience in ultrasound imaging performed diagnosis.
A descriptive analysis of the population and variables collected was carried out using the statistical analysis package IBM SPSS statistics v22 (IBM Co).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prophylactic mesh reinforcement | Patients were treated by small-bites closure plus prophylactic mesh reinforcement (onlay mesh). The mesh used was monofibrilar, non-absorbable and made of polypropylene and was fixed by simple stiches in an onlay position. |
| |
| Primary closure | Patients received primary fascial closure with small-bites alone. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Ultrasound or computed tomography | Diagnostic Test | One radiologist with experience in ultrasound imaging performed diagnosis. This exploration was performed using a single-blind technique. Patients included in the study that had any post-operative CT scan for any reason were evaluated and diagnosed with that imaging technique |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of Incisional Hernia | Presence of IH during follow-up in both groups and a comparison between both groups represented in a Kaplan meier curve | 0-2 years. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wound complications. | Differences between both groups in surgical wound complications | 0-2 years |
| Surgical Hospitalization times | differences between both groups in surgical hospitalization times |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with AAA open repair between January 2019 and December 2021 in our institution.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marta Fernandez Reyes Doallo | Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Ramón y Cajal | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
Individual participant data will not be available. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study will remain under the custody of the Investigators of Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal to ensure patient confidentiality and comply with institutional privacy policies
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000072836 | Surgical Wound |
| D001014 | Aortic Aneurysm |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D000783 | Aneurysm |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014057 | Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007090 | Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 0-2 years |
| Reintervention due to IH | Differences between both groups in need for reintervention due to IH | 0-2 years |
| D001018 |
| Aortic Diseases |
| D011856 | Radiographic Image Enhancement |
| D007089 | Image Enhancement |
| D010781 | Photography |
| D011859 | Radiography |
| D014056 | Tomography, X-Ray |
| D014054 | Tomography |