Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study, is to assess climbing performance metrics that include max strength testing on a rock climbing hangboard, maximum grip strength, assessment of pain and function using the DASH (disability of the arm, shoulder and hand), and maximum flexor strength and maximum extensor strength in climbers who perform a traditional finger training protocol compared to climbers who train both traditional flexor training protocol and extensor tendons.
Hand, forearm strength, and endurance are highly important elements in elite climbers. Constant training is essential, e.g. eccentric-concentric training of finger flexors. Climbers have traditionally trained finger flexor strength for climbing performance, however to our knowledge, no formal protocol exists for training extensor tendons. In a study performed by Devise, finger flexor to extensor strength ratios were found to be 3:1 in non-climbers. In experienced or elite climbers however, the average ratio was 6:1 and as high as 9:1. Upper extremity injuries are most common in rock climbers, with finger injuries being most prevalent. Pulley injuries, consisting of rupture of the A2 or A4 annular pulleys are the most common type of injury. Other finger injuries include tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons, as well as lumbrical muscle tears. The coordinated action of flexor and extensor tendons allows for a wide range of hand movements, including grasping, gripping, and releasing objects, as well as intricate finger movements. The pulleys along the tendons (annular and cruciate) act as fulcrums, increasing the mechanical advantage of the tendons and allowing for efficient flexion. Damage to either flexor or extensor tendons can lead to significant loss of hand function. The purpose of our study, is to assess climbing performance metrics that include max strength testing on a rock climbing hangboard, maximum grip strength, assessment of pain and function using the DASH (disability of the arm, shoulder and hand), and maximum flexor strength and maximum extensor strength in climbers who perform a traditional finger training protocol compared to climbers who train both traditional flexor training protocol and extensor tendons.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Flexor Strength (MFS) | Experimental | Participants assigned to the Maximum Flexor Strength (MFS) group will perform a traditional finger flexor hangboard training protocol twice weekly for six weeks. Training is performed at 70% of maximal finger flexion strength using a standardized work-to-rest ratio. Participants will complete pre-, mid-, and post-intervention testing of grip strength, finger flexion strength, finger extension strength, finger endurance, and self-reported upper extremity function |
|
| Maximum Extensor Strength (MES) | Experimental | Participants assigned to the Maximum Extensor Strength (MES) group will perform a traditional finger flexor hangboard training protocol combined with a structured finger extensor training protocol twice weekly for six weeks. Extensor training is performed at 70% of maximal finger extension strength using isometric loading, and will . Participants will complete pre-, mid-, and post-intervention testing of grip strength, finger flexion strength, finger extension strength, finger endurance, and self-reported upper extremity function. |
|
| Control | No Intervention | Participants assigned to the control group will continue their usual climbing activities without participation in a structured finger training intervention. Participants will complete pre-, mid-, and post-testing identical to the intervention groups. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Hangboard Protocol | Other | A structured finger flexor strength training protocol performed on a climbing hangboard at 70% of maximal finger flexion strength. Training consists of 5 seconds of isometric loading followed by 5 seconds of rest for 6 repetitions per set, across 6 sets with 3 minutes rest between sets. Training is performed twice weekly for six weeks following a standardized upper extremity warm-up. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal Finger Extension Strength (MES) | Maximum isometric finger extension force for digits 2-5 measured using a VALD strain gauge system with finger loops positioned over the middle phalanx. Three 5-second trials per hand with 20 seconds rest; best of three recorded for each hand. | Baseline (pre-training), 3 weeks, and 7 weeks (post-training) |
| Maximal Finger Flexion Strength (MFS) on Hangboard | Maximal added load (or total load) for a 7-second hang on a 30 mm hangboard edge using a standardized half/open crimp position. Load increased until participant cannot maintain the full 7 seconds; maximal successful load recorded. | Baseline (pre-training), 3 weeks, and 7 weeks (post-training) |
| Finger Stamina and Endurance /Time Under Tension (TUT) at 80% of MFS | Stamina assessed as total time under tension while maintaining 80% of calculated maximal finger flexion strength using a Tindeq device and a 20 mm fingerblock. Endurance will be measured by calculating critical force at the completion of the test. Participants alternate 7-second work and 3-second rest cycles while attempting to maintain 80% target force for as many repetitions as possible to calculate stamina (up to 24 cycles). Critical Force will be calculated for each hand at completion of 24 cycles to measure endurance. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 7 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score | Self-reported upper extremity disability and symptoms using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, a 30-item validated instrument. Each item is scored from 1 (no difficulty/no symptoms) to 5 (unable to perform activity/severe symptoms). The final score is calculated using the standardized formula and converted to a scale ranging from 0 to 100, where: 0 = no disability 100 = most severe disability Higher scores indicate worse upper extremity function. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Maximal Finger Flexion and Extension Strength | Change from baseline to 7 weeks in maximal finger flexion strength (hangboard) and maximal finger extension strength (VALD). | Baseline to 7 weeks |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Chuck Ruot, PhD | Hardin-Simmons University | Principal Investigator |
| Cordelia M Mangia Jansson, MSc | KTH Royal Institute of Technology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mazamas | Portland | Oregon | 97215 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39560837 | Background | Gilmore NK, Klimek P, Abrahamsson E, Baar K. Effects of Different Loading Programs on Finger Strength in Rock Climbers. Sports Med Open. 2024 Nov 19;10(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00793-7. | |
| 30521297 | Background | Valenzuela M, Launico MV, Varacallo MA. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Hand Lumbrical Muscles. 2023 Nov 17. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534876/ |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Critical Force Calculations | View source |
Not provided
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. All data are coded by participant number and stored on a secure, password-protected computer accessible only to the research team. Due to the small sample size and the potential for re-identification based on detailed performance and training data, IPD sharing is not planned. Only aggregate, de-identified results will be reported in publications and presentations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a three-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial with repeated measures. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: traditional finger flexor training, combined finger flexor and extensor training, or a control group continuing regular climbing without intervention. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (3 weeks), and post-intervention (7 weeks)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Extensor Tendon Isometric Training | Other | A structured finger extensor tendon training protocol performed at 70% of maximal finger extension strength using isometric loading. This intervention will be in addition to performing the Finger Flexor Protocol. Training consists of 30-second isometric contractions with 3 minutes of rest between sets for a total of 6 sets per hand. Training is performed twice weekly for six weeks and is completed during rest periods of the finger flexor training protocol |
|
| Baseline, 3 weeks, and 7 weeks |
| Finger Flexion-to-Extension Strength Ratio | Ratio calculated from maximal finger flexion strength (hangboard test) divided by maximal finger extension strength (VALD test), calculated for each hand. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 7 weeks |
| 27616821 | Background | Colzani G, Tos P, Battiston B, Merolla G, Porcellini G, Artiaco S. Traumatic Extensor Tendon Injuries to the Hand: Clinical Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Surgical Procedure Review. J Hand Microsurg. 2016 Apr;8(1):2-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1572534. |
| 4120482 | Background | Johnson MA, Polgar J, Weightman D, Appleton D. Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles. An autopsy study. J Neurol Sci. 1973 Jan;18(1):111-29. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(73)90023-3. No abstract available. |
| 21913160 | Background | Salonikidis K, Amiridis IG, Oxyzoglou N, Giagazoglou P, Akrivopoulou G. Wrist flexors are steadier than extensors. Int J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;32(10):754-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280777. Epub 2011 Sep 12. |
| 11415670 | Background | Hagg GM, Milerad E. Forearm extensor and flexor muscle exertion during simulated gripping work -- an electromyographic study. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1997 Jan;12(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(96)00049-6. |
| 30943568 | Background | Lum D, Barbosa TM. Brief Review: Effects of Isometric Strength Training on Strength and Dynamic Performance. Int J Sports Med. 2019 May;40(6):363-375. doi: 10.1055/a-0863-4539. Epub 2019 Apr 3. |
| 16225880 | Background | Vigouroux L, Quaine F, Labarre-Vila A, Moutet F. Estimation of finger muscle tendon tensions and pulley forces during specific sport-climbing grip techniques. J Biomech. 2006;39(14):2583-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.08.027. Epub 2005 Oct 12. |
| 36757124 | Background | Leung J. A Guide to Indoor Rock Climbing Injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2023 Feb 1;22(2):55-60. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000001036. |
| 22131087 | Background | Philippe M, Wegst D, Muller T, Raschner C, Burtscher M. Climbing-specific finger flexor performance and forearm muscle oxygenation in elite male and female sport climbers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Aug;112(8):2839-47. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2260-1. Epub 2011 Dec 1. |
| 31193395 | Background | Saul D, Steinmetz G, Lehmann W, Schilling AF. Determinants for success in climbing: A systematic review. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2019 Jul;17(3):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 May 3. |
| 38077281 | Background | Devise M, Pasek L, Goislard De Monsabert B, Vigouroux L. Finger flexion to extension ratio in healthy climbers: a proposal for evaluation and rebalance. Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Nov 23;5:1243354. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1243354. eCollection 2023. |
| No Hangs Protocol Warm up Routine | View source |