Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-A00095-46 | Other Identifier | IDRCB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of performing a focal Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA) procedure using Koelis TMA® under local anesthesia in patient with localized prostate cancer.
Eligible patients will undergo the procedure under local anesthesia instead of general anesthesia or deep sedation as part of their routine clinical care.
The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of completing the procedure under local anesthesia, defined by the proportion of patients in whom the procedure is successfully completed under local anesthesia. Secondary objectives include the assessment of safety, ease of performance, patient satisfaction, and the use of analgesic medication.
This study is designed as a feasibility clinical investigation conducted in a routine clinical practice setting.
This clinical investigation is a prospective feasibility study designed to evaluate the feasibility of performing a focal Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA) procedure using Koelis TMA® under local anesthesia in patient with localized prostate cancer. Koelis TMA® is a CE-marked medical device use without any modification to the device's intended use.
The study will be conducted in a routine clinical care setting. Eligible patients requiring the procedure will be included after providing informed consent.
The study consists of four visits. At the inclusion visit (Visit 0), patient eligibility will be confirmed and baseline data will be collected. The intervention will be performed during Visit 1 under local anesthesia according to standard clinical practice. A follow-up phone call (Visit 2) will be conducted 7 days after the procedure (±2 days) to assess safety and tolerability data. The end-of-study visit (Visit 3) will take place 1 month after the intervention (±7 days) during a routine follow-up consultation.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the feasibility of performing the procedure under local anesthesia. Feasibility will be evaluated by the proportion of patients in whom the procedure is successfully completed under local anesthesia. If the patient presents marked discomfort, pain, or any other symptoms that make the continuation of the procedure inappropriate, it may be interrupted at his request or at the initiative of the investigator. Local anesthesia can therefore be converted to general anesthesia or deep sedation to allow treatment to continue.
Secondary objectives include the assessment of procedure tolerability, safety, ease of performance as assessed by the operator, patient satisfaction related to anesthesia, and the amount of analgesic or pain medication administered during the study period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local Anesthesia | Experimental | Patient undergoing the focal targeted microwave ablation procedure performed under local anesthesia using the Koelis TMA® |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local Anesthesia (lidocaine hydrochloride) | Procedure | Participants will receive the focal treatment performed with Koelis TMA® under local anesthesia |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of focal TMA therapy under local anesthesia in patients with localized prostate cancer | Feasibility will be assessed by the rate of complete procedure performed under local anesthesia, defined as the proportion of patients in whom the procedure is completed under local anesthesia without the unplanned use of general anesthesia or sedation or premature termination of treatment | Day 0 - Intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Patient satisfaction regarding the procedure under local anesthesia | The patient's satisfaction regarding the TMA procedure will be assessed by a questionnaire after the procedure | Day 0 - Intervention |
| 1 month patient satisfaction regarding the procedure under local anesthesia |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOSSAN Claire | Contact | +33 (0)7 85 05 40 23 | claire.jossan@koelis.com | |
| JOFFRAY Eloïse | Contact | + 33 (0)6 32 60 41 80 | eloise.joffray@koelis.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| ANRACT Julien, MD | APHP - Hôpital Cochin Port Royal | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institut Jules Bordet | Brussels | 1070 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000772 | Anesthesia, Local |
| D008012 | Lidocaine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000765 | Anesthesia, Conduction |
| D000758 | Anesthesia |
| D000760 | Anesthesia and Analgesia |
| D000083 | Acetanilides |
Not provided
Not provided
This study is exploratory in nature. Given its feasibility design, no formal sample size calculation has been performed, and a total of 20 patients are planned to be included.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The patient's satisfaction regarding the TMA procedure will be assessed by a questionnaire 1 month after the procedure |
| 1 month |
| Ease of performing the procedure from the operator's point of view | The ease of performing the procedure will be evaluated by a score given by the operator (1: very easy; 2: easy; 3: moderate; 4: difficult, 5: very difficult). | Day 0 - Intervention |
| Patient's level of pain at the time of administration of local anesthesia | The patient's average pain level will be assessed during the administration of local anesthesia by a numerical pain rating scale from 0 to 10. | Day 0 - Intervention |
| Patient's pain level during the TMA treatment, | The patient's average pain level will be assessed during microwave ablation via a numerical pain rating scale from 0 to 10. | Day 0 - Intervention |
| To assess the patient's level of pain after treatment, | The patient's average pain level will be assessed 1 hour after treatment via a numerical pain rating scale from 0 to 10. | Day 0 - Intervention |
| To evaluate the duration of the different stages of the procedure, | Description of the duration of the different stages of the ablation procedure will be evaluated by:
| Day 0 - Intervention |
| Success of the completion of the procedure | The success of the completion/procedure will be assessed by the percentage of recovery of the lesion to be treated by microwave ablations | Day 0 - Intervention |
| Feasibility of performing a TMA procedure in ambulatory setting | The feasibility of ambulatory treatment will be assessed based on the percentage of hospitalizations lasting less than 12 hours. | Day 0 - Intervention |
| Tolerance of performing the procedure under local anesthesia, | Safety will be assessed by the number and severity of procedure-related adverse events, collected throughout the duration of the study | 1 month |
| Amount of medication received by the patient | The amount of medication received as measured by the amount of analgesic/painkiller received by the patient throughout the duration of the study | 1 month |
| Hôpital Cochin Port Royal | Paris | 75014 | France |
|
| D000813 |
| Anilides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000814 | Aniline Compounds |
| D000588 | Amines |