Patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasm

Patients who underwent endoscopic intermuscular dissection for rectal neoplasm

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an advanced endoscopic technique used to remove rectal tumors in one piece through the endoscope. A circumferential incision is then made in the mucosa, followed by careful dissection within the submucosal layer until the lesion is completely removed. This technique enables precise pathological assessment of tumor margins and depth of invasion and is typically used for lesions suspected to have superficial submucosal invasion without clear evidence of lymph node involvement. The procedure is performed using standard therapeutic endoscopic equipment and electrosurgical devices.

Bleeding occurring during the procedure that required advanced endoscopic hemostatic interventions beyond standard coagulation with the tip of the knife of coagulation forceps, resulted in hemodynamic instability, caused a significant prolongation of the procedure over 15 minutes (based on video), or led to procedure interruption or conversion

Full-thickness defect of the gastrointestinal wall identified during the procedure, evidenced by direct visualization of extraluminal structures (mesorectum or peritoneal cavity), or confirmed by the presence of free air on imaging performed immediately after the procedure.

Symptomatic bleeding including hematemesis, melena, or a hemoglobin decrease of more than 2 g/dL.

Clinical signs of peritonitis accompanied by radiological evidence of free intraperitoneal air.

The occurrence of localized abdominal pain or peritoneal irritation signs after EID, accompanied by inflammatory response (elevated white blood cell count or C-reactive protein), in the absence of radiological or endoscopic evidence of perforation.

Any unplanned therapeutic intervention related to the index procedure during hospitalization or follow-up, including repeat endoscopy, endoscopic or radiological intervention, blood transfusion, or surgical treatment. Planned surveillance procedures were not considered additional interventions.

The rate of lesions removed in a single specimen, enabling accurate macroscopic and histological assessment as reported by an endoscopist in a procedure protocol.