Totally Versus Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer - A Multicentric Phase III Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Totally Versus Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer - A Multicentric Phase III Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers remain associated with poor survival despite progress in multimodal treatment. Surgery, especially Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, combined with peri-operative therapy improves survival but is burdened by major morbidity, mainly respiratory and anastomotic complications, which compromise recovery and adjuvant treatment.
Minimally invasive approaches such as totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE) have shown potential to reduce postoperative morbidity compared to the hybrid approach (HE). However, existing studies are heterogeneous, mostly retrospective, and insufficient to establish a standard.
This trial aims to provide high-level evidence comparing TMIE to HE, including robotic techniques, with integrated analyses of clinical outcomes, quality of life, and health economics.
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion criteria for screening - part A (for patients receiving a neo-adjuvant treatment)
Inclusion criteria before surgery (after neo-adjuvant treatment or for patients receiving primary surgery)
Exclusion Criteria:
Non inclusion criteria for screening - part A (for patients receiving a neo-adjuvant treatment)
Patient-related non-inclusion criteria
Disease-related non-inclusion criteria
Non inclusion criteria before surgery (after neo-adjuvant treatment or for patients receiving primary surgery)
Disease-related non-inclusion criteria
thibault.voron@aphp.fr0171970187
guillaume.piessen@chu-lille.fr0320445506