Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of intra-radicular attachments fabricated by direct scanning using three different scanners in vivo. The primary outcome will be the accuracy of the fabricated attachments, while secondary outcomes will includepatient-reported comfort during procedure of taking intraradicular attachment conventional impression and direct scanning.
The fabrication of intra-radicular attachments is a critical step in restoring endodontically treated teeth. The accuracy of these restorations directly impacts their clinical performance, including retention, marginal fit, and long-term success. With advancements in digital dentistry, intraoral scanners (IOS) have become increasingly popular for direct scanning of intra-radicular preparations. However, the accuracy of these scanners varies depending on their technology, software, and clinical conditions
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Active Comparator | Indirect scanning by desktop scanner (for the conventional impression) |
|
| Group II | Experimental | Intraoral scanning by Intraoral scanner A |
|
| Group III | Experimental | Intraoral scanning by Intraoral scanner B |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 shape desktop scanner | Device | Scanning of intra-radicular impression by desktop scanner |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | measure accuracy between the dimension of the prepared canal gained by intra-radicular impression and the dimension of the prepared canal directly by two different types of intraoral scanners | Immediately after scanning. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient-reported comfort | Patient-reported comfort (assessed via a Likert scale questionnaire) Scaled from 0-100 The highest score means excellent The lowest score means unsatisfactory | Immediately after impression taking and scanning. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Afnan GM Qamar | Contact | 01158902700 | afnan.gamal98@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital of October 6 university | Recruiting | Giza | Giza Governorate | 12573 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SHINING 3D intraoral scanner |
| Device |
Direct scanning of the intra-radicular canal by Intraoral scanner A |
|
| Planmeca Emerald S intraoral scanner | Device | Direct scanning of the intra-radicular canal by Intraoral scanner B |
|