Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Purpose: This clinical study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications of different distributions of four implants supported mandibular overdentures using Stress free implant bar (SFI-Bar attachments). Evaluation was done for patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications
Purpose: This clinical study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications of different distributions of four implants supported mandibular overdentures using Stress free implant bar (SFI-Bar attachments). Materials and Methods: thirty completely edentulous patients with insufficient retention and stability of their conventional mandibular denture were eligible for this study. All patients received new maxillary and mandibular dentures. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. (G1): four implants were distributed in interforaminal distance, 2-Implant were inserted in canine region and 2- implant 8mm posterior to canine implants. (G2): 4-implants were distributed in quadrilateral distribution, 2-Implant in canine region and 2-Implant were inserted 26mm posterior to canine implant. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by visual analogue scale and prosthetic complications were evaluated on the patient level and implant patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| quadrilateral group | Other | 4-implants were distributed in quadrilateral distribution, 2-Implant in canine region and 2-Implant were inserted 26mm posterior to canine implant. |
|
| curved group | Other | Receive four implants distributed in interforaminal distance, 2-Implant were inserted in canine region and 2- implant 8mm posterior to canine implants. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| four implants inserted in the mandible and distributed in quadrilateral manner and SFI-Bar had been inserted | Procedure | Implant positions were planned at canines for both groups. (Intraforaminal): posterior implants are 8 mm posterior to the canine implants [minimum allowed inter-implant distance for SFIbars (Quadrilateral): posterior implants are 26 mm posterior to the canine implants [Maximum allowed inter-implant distance for SFI-bars](streamdown:incomplete-link) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| patient satisfaction | A visual analog scale (VAS) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) were used for evaluating patient satisfaction. Participants in the VAS were instructed to draw a vertical line anywhere along a horizontal line that was used as a scale, with 0 mm representing the worst and 100 mm representing the best. at the point that most accurately reflected their perceptions. General satisfaction, denture stability and retention, occlusion, comfort, ease of cleaning, ease of speaking, ease of chewing, bolus quality, and aesthetics | one year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| prosthetic complications | The complications include (1) complications of attachments: abutment fracture, abutment screw loosening, screw fracture, wear/distortion of retentive components, activation of retentive components, retention loss and replacement of retentive components, and separation of retentive components from the denture base, (2) technical complications of mandibular over-dentures: reline, fracture/remake, teeth wear, teeth separation/fracture, (3) technical complications of maxillary dentures: reline, fracture/remake, teeth wear, teeth separation/fracture, (4) Soft tis-sue complications of mandibular overdentures and maxillary dentures: mucositis, soreness, ulcer decubitus, hyperplasia, and flabbyridge |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Normal jaw relation Good oral hygiene Patient with class I or class II inter-rach space.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with TMJ disorder and heavy smokers for more than 10 cigarettes per day.
Uncooperative patient. Unfavorable occlusion. Limited restoration space (less than 12 mm).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marwa Aboelez, profesor | Mansoura University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marwa | Al Mansurah | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32142580 | Background | Mahanna FF, Elsyad MA, Mourad SI, Abozaed HW. Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Different Attachments Used for Implant-Retained Overdentures in Subjects with Resorbed Mandibles: A Crossover Trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):423-431. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7869. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017060 | Patient Satisfaction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Group 1: four implants were distributed in interforaminal distance, 2-Implant were inserted in canine region and 2-implant 8mm posterior to canine implants.
Group 2: four implants were distributed in quadrilateral distribution, 2-Implant in canine region and 2-Implant were inserted 26mm posterior to canine implant.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| one year |