Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-2287 | Other Identifier | Kastamonu University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the effects of an 8-week plyometric training program on the physical performance of male basketball players. The research focuses on measuring improvements in linear sprinting speed, change-of-direction (agility) abilities, and vertical jump height. Additionally, the study examines changes in the participants' muscle strength through isokinetic testing. Twenty-four trained basketball players were divided into two groups: the control group followed their regular basketball training, while the experimental group added specific plyometric exercises, such as jumps and bounds, twice per week. By comparing the results before and after the 8-week intervention period, the study seeks to determine if this training method effectively enhances the athletic skills required in competitive basketball.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate the multidimensional effects of a structured plyometric training (PT) intervention on competitive male basketball players. While vertical jump performance is a common focus in PT research, this study specifically evaluates the transfer of adaptations to sport-specific locomotor tasks and isokinetic muscle strength profiles.Participants (N = 24) were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (EG) or a control group (CG). Both groups maintained their standard basketball training, including shooting, 3-on-3 games, and defensive drills. The EG performed an additional 8-week progressive plyometric program twice weekly, consisting of exercises such as box jumps, depth jumps, and bounding, with a total volume ranging from 80 to 140 ground contacts per session. Training volume was meticulously logged, and an adherence rate of at least 85% was required for inclusion in the final analysis.Performance was evaluated through a comprehensive testing battery conducted pre- and post-intervention under standardized conditions. The primary outcomes focused on linear sprint speed (25-meter sprint) and change-of-direction (CoD) ability (V-cut test), which are critical for the high-intensity demands of basketball. Secondary outcomes included vertical jump height measured via countermovement jump (CMJ) with and without arm swing, and isokinetic knee and hip strength assessed at angular velocities of 60 degrees per second and 180 degrees per second.The study hypothesized that the addition of PT would lead to superior gains in sprint and CoD performance compared to basketball training alone. Furthermore, it aimed to explore whether these performance improvements are accompanied by significant changes in isokinetic torque production. Data were analyzed using a 2 (Time) x 2 (Group) repeated-measures ANOVA to identify significant interactions. Normality was verified using Skewness and Kurtosis z-scores, with Winsorization applied to outliers to maintain data robustness.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plyometric Training | Experimental | Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) followed a structured, progressive 8-week plyometric training (PT) program integrated into their regular basketball routine. The intervention was administered twice weekly (Tuesdays and Thursdays) with at least 48 hours of recovery between sessions. The program included vertical, horizontal, and lateral movements such as countermovement jumps (CMJ), box jumps, depth jumps, lateral bounds, and squat jumps. The volume progressed from 80 ground contacts per session in the first two weeks to 140 ground contacts per session in the final two weeks. Exercises were performed at maximal effort to maximize the utilization of the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC). All sessions were supervised by a certified strength and conditioning specialist to ensure proper technique and safety. This program was performed in addition to their standard technical and tactical basketball drills, which were identical to those performed by the control group. |
|
| Standard Basketball Training | No Intervention | Participants in the Control Group (CG) followed their standard basketball training routine for a duration of 8 weeks. This arm serves as the baseline to compare the specific effects of the plyometric intervention administered to the experimental group. The sessions consisted of standard technical and tactical basketball drills, including shooting practice, defensive positioning, offensive sets, and scrimmages (e.g., 3-on-3 or 5-on-5 games). Participants maintained their regular schedule of five training sessions per week, with each session lasting approximately 90 to 120 minutes. Participants in this group did not participate in any structured plyometric, strength, or power-based conditioning programs during the study period. All participants were instructed to maintain their normal nutritional habits and daily physical activities to ensure that no external variables influenced the performance outcomes. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8-Week Progressive Plyometric Training Program | Other | The intervention consists of a structured 8-week progressive plyometric training (PT) program designed specifically for competitive basketball players. It is performed twice weekly as a supplement to standard technical and tactical basketball drills.
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 25-meter Linear Sprint Time | Time taken to complete a 25-meter straight-line sprint from a standing start. This measure evaluates linear speed and explosive acceleration. The test is conducted on a basketball court using electronic timing gates, with the best time of three trials recorded to ensure data accuracy. | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8). |
| V-cut Agility Test Time | Time taken to complete the V-cut agility test, which requires participants to perform four 25-degree directional changes over a 20-meter distance. This measure evaluates change-of-direction speed and maneuverability. The best time of three trials is recorded in seconds using electronic timing gates. | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Countermovement Jump (CMJ) Height | Assessment of explosive lower-body power. Measured using an Optojump photoelectric system (Microgate, Italy) while participants perform a maximal vertical jump with hands on hips. | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8). |
| Isokinetic Peak Torque of Knee Extensors and Flexors |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kastamonu University, Faculty of Sports Sciences | Kastamonu | 37150 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36036301 | Result | Ramirez-Campillo R, Perez-Castilla A, Thapa RK, Afonso J, Clemente FM, Colado JC, de Villarreal ES, Chaabene H. Effects of Plyometric Jump Training on Measures of Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance of Water Sports Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Sports Med Open. 2022 Aug 29;8(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00502-2. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Institutional website of the Faculty of Sports Sciences where the study was conducted. | View source |
Not provided
The de-identified individual participant dataset, including performance outcomes (25m sprint, V-cut agility, vertical jump, and isokinetic strength values), will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request. Interested parties must provide a methodologically sound research proposal and sign a data access agreement. Requests should be directed to the Principal Investigator at Kastamonu University
Data will be available starting 6 months after article publication and will remain accessible for up to 36 months.
Data will be shared with investigators who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve the aims in the approved proposal. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author.
Not provided
Not provided
The study followed a pre-test/post-test parallel-group randomized design. A total of 24 male basketball players were assigned to one of two arms: 1. Experimental Group (n = 12): Participants integrated a progressive plyometric training (PT) program into their routine basketball schedule. The PT was performed twice weekly (Tuesdays and Thursdays) for 8 weeks, focusing on high-intensity jumping and bounding exercises to enhance the stretch-shortening cycle. 2. Control Group (n = 12): Participants continued their standard basketball training program (technical and tactical drills) without any additional plyometric intervention. Both groups were assessed simultaneously at baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 8) using the same testing battery (25-meter sprint, V-cut agility, countermovement jump, and isokinetic dynamometry) under identical environmental conditions to ensure comparability.
Not provided
Not provided
Due to the nature of the intervention (physical exercise and plyometric training), it was not possible to mask the participants or the coaching staff to the group assignments. Both the experimental and control groups were aware of their respective training protocols. However, to minimize bias during the assessment and data processing phases: 1.Data Analysis: The statistical analysis was performed by a researcher who was blinded to the group allocations. All data were coded to ensure anonymity until the completion of the analysis. 2. Standardization: To ensure objectivity, all physical performance tests, including the 25-meter sprint, V-cut agility, and isokinetic strength, were conducted using automated electronic timing systems (Witty, Microgate, Italy) and computerized dynamometers (Isomed 2000, D&R Ferstl GmbH, Germany). These objective measures eliminate potential manual measurement errors.
Not provided
|
|
Maximal concentric muscle strength of the knee extensors and flexors is measured at angular velocities of 60 degrees per second and 180 degrees per second. Assessments are performed using an isokinetic dynamometer (Isomed 2000, D&R Ferstl GmbH, Germany). The peak torque value from five maximal repetitions at each speed is recorded. |
| Baseline (Week 0) and Post-intervention (Week 8). |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059385 | Plyometric Exercise |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005081 | Exercise Therapy |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D064797 | Physical Conditioning, Human |
| D015444 | Exercise |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
| D009142 | Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided