Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIHR158809 | Other Grant/Funding Number | National Institute for Health and Care Research UK |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Manchester | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background
Increasing numbers of children and young people are being referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). However, a quarter are 'rejected' for treatment. This can happen for simple reasons like:
Aims This project aims to develop a simple, clear way for children and young people to get the right support for their mental health problems when they need it. This project aims to solve the problems people told us about and to improve the quality of referrals made to CAMHS.
Design & Methods
The project team shall:
The project team shall talk to children and young people, families, GPs, school staff, CAMHS staff and policymakers and build the new referral process with the project team. The project team shall hold several workshops which will shape the new digital tools, and ensure the project team considers how to include the right non-digital supports. The project team shall test the new process across 5-8 CAMHS and use a mix of statistical and interview data to understand if the new referral process is valued, useful and easy to use. The project team's partner, MQ, will develop a plan to roll out the tool nationally and to support its use in the long term.
Patient & Public Involvement The project team shall build on established collaborations with young people, their parents/carers/families. The project teamwon a national award for public involvement in the ENCAMHS 1 project. The project team shall be advised throughout by the Young People's Advisory Group (YPAG) and by the Parents and Professionals Advisory group (PPAG). The YPAG and PPAG from the ENCAMHS 1 project have told the project team they would like to work with the project team again on this project. The project team shall also recruit new members.
Dissemination The project team want this project to transform how children and young people get access to appropriate mental health support and to reduce some of the pressures on CAMHS. The project team shall share learning with national NHS bodies. The project team shall make the digital tools the project team builds widely available through the networks. The project team shall publish the academic findings and share widely through social media and mental health partner networks.
BACKGROUND Children and young people's mental health is a national priority for the Department of Health and Social Care [1] and all major national funders. This research addresses critical problems in the referral processes to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) that the project team identified during the project team's qualitative research program during the project team's NIHR HS&DR-funded EN-CAMHS 1 project.
The NIHR funded EN-CAMHS project ("EN-CAMHS 1", NIHR131379) consulted with 110 CAMHS stakeholders (CYP, parents/carers, GPs, mental health school staff and CAMHS professionals) [17]. EN-CAMHS 1 confirmed and extended previous research: stakeholders reported widespread confusion about the kinds of support CAMHS can and cannot provide. Referrers reported poor support during the referral process, lack of transparency about the process and a lack of knowledge and low confidence in other sources of support. Services reported poor quality of referrals such that many were 'rejected'. Families described using 'workarounds' to get to CAMHS (e.g. going to A&E). This is concerning not least because it highlights families' difficulties, but also because it disrupts the goals of referral and triage: i.e. to provide timely, appropriate care and to prioritise those in most need. The project team identified overwhelming problems with the current referral processes resulting in high levels of unnecessary additional cost to services; and widespread despair for referrers and for children and families.
RATIONALE Direct changes to CAMHS resourcing and staffing are the domain of DHSC and not something the project team can change. However, by improving referrals, the work can relieve additional pressure on services, make the process work better and create greater satisfaction for users. The project team can also increase understanding of what CAMHS is and does; and create confidence in CAMHS alternatives. The research has demonstrated an urgent health and care need to provide a straightforward referral process to ensure that children most in need are prioritised for treatment, and that all children are signposted to appropriate help in a timely manner. Such a process needs to be scalable, low cost, widely accessible and sustainable over time.
110 CAMHS stakeholders in EN-CAMHS 1 [18] repeatedly expressed a clear preference for a digital solution that could simplify and improve the CAMHS referral process. Stakeholders unanimously advised that the project team should create a national, standardised referral process which could also be tailored to local CAMHS' configurations. To date, there has been no national collaboration to improve the referral process; rather, piecemeal attempts across CAMHS providers have adopted different approaches. The project team's audit of such approaches unfortunately suggests referrals do not meet the requirements of CAMHS stakeholders identified in EN-CAMHS 1. For example, none has been rigorously co-developed with stakeholders; none provides a mechanism for people to track 'where they are' in the referral journey once a referral is submitted. From a technical perspective, the digital tools currently developed are not interoperable with core NHS infrastructure (e.g. NHS app; NHS website). There is patchy sharing of digital referrals in geographically-aligned providers, but it is fragmented and again lacks most of the recommendations the project team brings from EN-CAMHS 1 stakeholders for what the digital referral should 'look like'.
EN-CAMHS 1 stakeholders recommended the project team implement a digital solution to address the current problems of poor communication, missing information, poor data quality and lack of guidance for families about what to expect of the referral journey. The design and development of the digital tool will specifically address the accessibility needs of referrers. The project team intend to explore issues of digital accessibility in the consultations (WP1) and in the co-design workshops with participants. The project team shall also consider the three key elements of digital exclusion: lack of digital access; lack of digital skills; lack of confidence to use digital. The project team will explore these challenges in the co-design workshops, with stakeholders in consultation and with advisory groups. The digital tool will supplement rather than supplant traditional modes of referral; traditional (e.g. paper based) modes of referral will remain. However, the project team anticipates that the project team's digital tool will enable more people to make more successful referrals than before.
The project team shall also generate new knowledge about the patterns of referrals into CAMHS, by automating data collection through the digital tools and thereby enabling services and NHS England to understand referral and treatment data in greater detail than ever before. The project team see enormous potential in this project and its learnings/outputs for cross-pollination to other services experiencing similar problems.
Referrals overwhelming CAMHS The project team cannot increase CAMHS staff levels or change what it can provide.
The project team can make the referral process work better and with greater satisfaction for referrers and for those being referred.
The project team can increase confidence in CAMHS alternatives and increase follow-through into CAMHS alternatives.
The project team can help CAMHS prioritise the needs of those it is designed to help.
Quality of referrals is poor The project team can provide clear, accessible guidelines to make appropriate referrals.
The project team can validate input on the referral form and ensure all required information is completed pre-submission.
The project team can raise awareness about what a good referral is. The project team can educate people about common referral mistakes.
Poor experience of referral The project team can explain the referral process clearly. The project team can outline key steps in the referral journey and inform people about the expected waiting times for the local CAMHS triage process.
The project team can update referrers and CYP/families as their referral moves through the system.
The project team can signpost to local and national resources that may help during the waiting period.
Costs for CAMHS The project team can reduce CAMHS clinical time wasted by automating the checking of referral documents before they are submitted.
The project team can reduce costs for individual and families by streamlining this process.
The project team can improve referral success by ensuring alternative non-CAMHS support is signposted appropriately and explained.
Poor information The project team can provide straightforward accessible information translated into multiple languages.
The project team can signpost to phoneline support for those who are not comfortable with technology.
Lack of confidence in non-CAMHS The project team can make non-CAMHS support more understandable and transparent to people using services by linking to real-life case studies / CYP stories and working with CAMHS stakeholders.
The project team can help build trust between referrers and services.
Timeliness of Assessment by CAMHS The project team can divert CYP to alternative services which may free CAMHS to see those who need CAMHS most, sooner.
The project team can reduce the workload of CAMHS staff in triaging inappropriate referrals.
The project team can free up CAMHS clinical time for more complex appropriate referrals.
The project team can make referrals faster and more reliable. The project team can make referrals 'recyclable' so re-referrals do not 'fall out' of the system and need to 'start from scratch'/'go back to the back of the queue.'
EVIDENCE The number of children and young people (CYP) waiting longer than 12-weeks for mental health treatment in England is at a five-year high [19]. The challenge for CAMHS improvement is complex, but a review of the current literature has identified how the referral process represents an important aspect of this leading to children waiting until they are very unwell to access care [10,19]; possibly needing more prolonged and intensive treatment as a result and leading to lack of trust in services [20,21]. Simple, practical problems already identified in the literature include lack of transparency in the referral process; incomplete information in referral forms; poor communication with referrers/families throughout the process; lack of information about where else to seek help and who can refer into CAMHS [e.g. 22-25]. The NIHR HS&DR-funded EN-CAMHS 1 extended this understanding of the challenges for referrals into CAMHS.
Existing evidence suggests potential solutions include: a 'single point of access' (SPoA) within CAMHS [e.g. 26-28] referrer-friendly guidelines with training to support referrers [14]; increasing, and ring-fencing funding available to CAMHS [6]; clarity about CYP mental health support available for referrers that is separate from CAMHS and which may be more readily and repeatedly available in the community [9,27]; and a call for policymakers to improve collaboration between professionals involved in supporting CYP mental health [11]. However, an audit of CAMHS referral processes found that only 11 providers (out of 78) have online, interactive referral forms, many of which have poor user interfaces and are difficult to navigate. Most have no online referral mechanism and provide lengthy documents that need to be downloaded, printed and/or emailed individually to each different provider. Referrers told the project team these forms were often hard to find, confusing and difficult to complete. Easy-win opportunities to provide online referral forms that automatically validate information and support accessibility (e.g. translations) have not been exploited. Other helpful information, such as: overviews of what CAMHS can and cannot provide, indicative waiting times, signposting to alternative local sources of help and other support mechanisms are not available in a standardised format. Children and families told the project team they did not know where to find information about CAMHS and that they did not know which sources of information to trust. Opportunities for co-designed, patient-centred communications accessible to this (and other) marginalised and under-represented groups have been missed.
EN-CAMHS 1 engaged widely with children and families, policymakers, commissioners, mental health staff, NHS England and other CAMHS stakeholders to identify the key problems and the tractable solutions to the CAMHS referral problems. Stakeholders advocated for a digitally-led referral process that would support completeness of submitted information; signpost to alternative help and resources (where applicable); real-time updates about where a child is on the referral pathway and approximate waiting times to referral outcomes and treatment. Mental health staff identified time-savings that would accrue from receiving correct and accurate information at the point of referral review. GPs and school staff advised that the system needs to guide them through the referral process and advise on alternative sources of help; the current processes are simply not fit for purpose and often cause distress to children and families.
Another key benefit of a standardised referral system is the ability to automatically collect data for onward reporting to national bodies (e.g. waiting times to NHS England). This automatic data collection would further enable benchmarking of CAMHS referral processes widely across and within Trusts in the UK. This monitoring of service performance in turn can provide a means for responding to problems quickly, as well as targeting support to areas where there are clear challenges.
RESEARCH QUESTION/AIM(S) The overarching aim is to improve the CAMHS referral process for CYP, their families and carers, as well as for health, education and CAMHS professionals so that CYP receive the help they need as quickly as possible.
Research questions:
Objectives
Outcome To the project team's knowledge, this is the first study designed specifically to develop a solution to the challenge of rejected/inappropriate CAMHS referrals. Through extensive consultation with all key stakeholders on the referral process throughout EN-CAMHS 1, the project team are now positioned to build a solution to the problems of referral that addresses the needs of all types of referrers, including notably young people and their families. The project team's broad network of collaborators and partners on the project will support widespread dissemination of the work. The project team's partner MQ will work closely with the project team throughout the project to ensure dissemination, outputs and impact are maximised for the benefit of young people who require mental health support. As in EN-CAMHS 1, the project team shall leverage the project team's extensive mental health networks to influence and support policy change to bring benefit to CYP and their families through an enhanced referral process. The project team will aim to share findings as soon as possible and tailor these to the audience. The project team shall do this through ongoing updates through social media channels and those of the project team's partners (critically, MQ) and through ongoing presentations, conferences, seminars and informal events across the full lifetime of the project. MQ is the dissemination partner and the project team shall hold events with stakeholders throughout the project as part of the parallel work on implementation.
The project has the potential for far-reaching and sustained impact. Specifically, the project team anticipate and will aim for the following effects:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Work Package 1 | Other | Requirements Prioritisation We shall hold 2 x roundtable events (Manchester and London) to gather feedback and input from senior stakeholders (e.g. NHS England senior leaders; commissioners, CAMHS leaders). With our partner MQ, we shall conduct 6 stakeholder focus groups with CYP, families/carers and professionals including GPs, to collaboratively prioritise requirements (identified in EN-CAMHS 1) for the revised digital tool. We aim to recruit up to 10 stakeholders per group, therefore 60 participants in total. We shall use the MoSCoW prioritisation method [29] collaboratively as we have done in a number of other NIHR funded digital health projects. As part of this prioritisation process, each of the existing 11 interactive CAMHS referral forms created by individual CAMHS in England will be rated using the System Usability Scale [30] and using criteria from the EN-CAMHS 1 focus groups e.g. navigability, clarity of language, accessibility. | ||
| Work Package 2 | Other | Co-Design and Tool Implementation Onboard 5-8 CAMHS providers (with different characteristics and served populations) who are willing and can support an evaluation of the digitally-enhanced CAMHS tool in collaboration with our partners, NHS England. Workshops with 5-8 Trust staff from each provider. Co-design the tool with CAMHS stakeholders (2 x 1-hour workshops with 25 referrers). Ensure accessibility support (WCAG2.2 and assistive technology, translations of the tools etc) is extensive and supports needs identified by stakeholder consultation (Digital Accessibility Working Group n=10) and in collaboration with PPIE, YPAG and PPAG. This group will be formed from the project with characteristics derived from accessibility needs identified in the stakeholder codesign groups and from ENCAMHS 1. This group shall meet twice during the co-design process to review the tool and suggest accessibility enhancements. Every effort will be made to incorporate suggestions made by this group. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Outcome Measure | If the referral tool improves the experience of referral process, using data collected during focus groups | 2 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Participants recruited will:
Have capacity to consent.
Be 16 years or over.
Be a CAMHS stakeholder who has had experience with the CAMHS referral process:
CAMHS Staff: we will include any staff who currently work in CAMHS services Collaborators: We will include collaborators who have direct experience of the current referral process for CAMHS Children and Young People (CYP): We will be recruiting CYP who have been referred to CAMHS regardless of whether they were accepted into the service or not. CYP will be aged 16-30, and will have experience of the CAMHS referral process in the past 5 years.
Key referrers: We would ask that these individuals have had experience referring CYP to CAMHS, regardless of how many times.
Parents/carers: we will ask parents/carers who have experience of their child or a child in their care having been referred to CAMHS, regardless of the outcome of the referral. CAMHS Commissioners: We will ask Commissioners who understand the current CAMHS referral processes locally or nationally, and who are involved in the funding process Mental Health Leads: We will invite people with a strategic overview of the CAMHS referral process locally or nationally to share their experiences of the referral process.
Be proficient in English (or a supported language of the translated referral process).
Exclusion Criteria
Regarding any level of illness/disability:
We feel it is up to the young person to make this decision during the consent process, and we could not make that decision for them. We will inform participants during the consent process (i.e. in the PIS and subsequent discussions) that there may be discussion which they could find upsetting, and we have a distress protocol in place for if anyone needs additional support, but that this should be considered when agreeing to take part in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Professionals, young people and parents/carers who have experience of the CAMHS referral process.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi R Tranter, PhD | Contact | +447856067940 | heidi.tranter@manchester.ac.uk |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Manchester | Manchester | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 1. Department of Health and Social Care (2023). URL: https://healthmedia.blog.gov.uk/2023/06/09/how-we-are-supporting-mental-health-services-in-england/ (accessed 25 July 2023) | ||
| Background | 2. Children's Mental Health Services 2021/22 (2023). Children's Commissioner. URL: https://assets.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/wpuploads/2023/03/Childrens-Mental-Health-Services-2021-2022-2.pdf (accessed 25 July 2023) | ||
| Background | 3. Korkodilos M. The mental health of children and young people in England. London: Public Health England. 2016. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_d ata/file/575632/Mental_health_of_children_in_England.pdf (accessed 25 July 2023) | ||
| Background | 4. Newlove-Delgado, T., Williams, T., Robertson, K., McManus, S., Sadler, K., Vizard, T., Cartwright, C., Mathews, F., Norman, S., Marcheselli, F. and Ford, T., 2021. Mental Health of Children and Young People in England 2021-wave 2 follow up to the 2017 survey. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/28718/1/ | ||
| 33938419 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIHR Funding Awards | View source |
Not provided
It is not required for IPD to be shared as part of this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol: Study_Protocol | Oct 29, 2025 | Dec 15, 2025 | Prot_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Oct 30, 2025 | Dec 15, 2025 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Work Package 3 | Other | Evaluation of Implementation Evaluate implementation of the new digitally-enhanced referral process with 60 key referrers. Explore the potential, enablers and barriers of embedding a new CAMHS referral mechanism via semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 referrers. Develop a blueprint and toolkit for CAMHS to implement the referral tool. Understand if and how the tool enhances the CAMHS referral process. |
| Work Package 4 | Other | The charity MQ Mental Health Research was a key partner to EN-CAMHS 1. We plan to continue this successful partnership in EN-CAMHS 2. In this WP4, MQ will drive the sustainability of the EN-CAMHS tools. MQ are actively engaged in discussions with the Prudence Trust about longer-term sustainability support for the platform. MQ aim to collaborate to drive and support the tools' implementation, nationally if possible. This will require lobbying key national stakeholders (including senior policymakers, regional ICB leads, mental health professional bodies) to support implementation of the platform for the medium and longer terms, beyond the lifetime of this grant. MQ have secured funding from the Prudence Trust to support longer term sustainability for the referral tool and enhanced referral processes developed through this project. |
| Background |
| McNicholas F, Kelleher I, Hedderman E, Lynch F, Healy E, Thornton T, Barry E, Kelly L, McDonald J, Holmes K, Kavanagh G, Migone M. Referral patterns for specialist child and adolescent mental health services in the Republic of Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with 2019 and 2018. BJPsych Open. 2021 May 3;7(3):e91. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.48. |
| 34729906 | Background | Grant C, Blackburn R, Harding D, Golden S, Toth K, Scott S, Ford T, Downs J. Impact of counselling provision in primary schools on child and adolescent mental health service referral rates: a longitudinal observational cohort study. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2023 May;28(2):212-220. doi: 10.1111/camh.12519. Epub 2021 Nov 2. |
| Background | 7. YoungMinds (2022). URL: https://www.youngminds.org.uk/about-us/media-centre/press-releases/mental-health-waiting-times-harming-young-people/ (accessed 25 June 2023) |
| 26487568 | Background | Iskra W, Deane FP, Wahlin T, Davis EL. Parental perceptions of barriers to mental health services for young people. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;12(2):125-134. doi: 10.1111/eip.12281. Epub 2015 Oct 20. |
| 33514400 | Background | Hansen AS, Telleus GK, Mohr-Jensen C, Lauritsen MB. Parent-perceived barriers to accessing services for their child's mental health problems. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2021 Jan 29;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00357-7. |
| Background | 10. Scottish Government (2018). URL: https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/research-and-analysis/2018/06/rejected-referrals-child-adolescent-mental-health-services-camhs-qualitative-quantitative/documents/00537523-pdf/00537523-pdf/govscot%3Adocument/00537523.pdf (accesses 26 July 2023) |
| 30990911 | Background | Crouch L, Reardon T, Farrington A, Glover F, Creswell C. "Just keep pushing": Parents' experiences of accessing child and adolescent mental health services for child anxiety problems. Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Jul;45(4):491-499. doi: 10.1111/cch.12672. Epub 2019 May 27. |
| 32677372 | Background | Smith J, Kyle RG, Daniel B, Hubbard G. Patterns of referral and waiting times for specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2018 Feb;23(1):41-49. doi: 10.1111/camh.12207. Epub 2017 Feb 9. |
| Background | 13. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. URL: https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/news-events/news/school-referrals-mental-health-treatment-rise-third#:~:text=RCPCH's%20Dr%20Max%20Davie%20responds,in%20the%20last%20three%20years (accessed 26 July 2023) |
| Background | 14. Education and Health Select Committees. URL: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhealth/849/849.pdf (accessed 26 July 2023) |
| 32873538 | Background | Lambert AK, Doherty AJ, Wilson N, Chauhan U, Mahadevan D. GP perceptions of community-based children's mental health services in Pennine Lancashire: a qualitative study. BJGP Open. 2020 Oct 27;4(4):bjgpopen20X101075. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101075. Print 2020 Oct. |
| 23148343 | Background | Hinrichs S, Owens M, Dunn V, Goodyer I. General practitioner experience and perception of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) care pathways: a multimethod research study. BMJ Open. 2012 Nov 12;2(6):e001573. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001573. Print 2012. |
| Background | 17. Evans, N. and Huws-Thomas, M., 2020. Case note review of community mental health services for children and young people in a UK rural location. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 15(3), pp.171-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-10-2019-0055 |
| 40521776 | Background | Abel KM, Whelan P, Carter LA, Tranter H, Stockton-Powdrell C, Gutridge K, Hassan L, Elvins R, Edbrooke-Childs J. Enhancing referrals to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: the EN-CAMHS mixed-methods study. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(21):1-59. doi: 10.3310/GYDW4507. |
| Background | 19. NHS Benchmarking Network (2019). URL: https://www.nhsbenchmarking.nhs.uk/news/2019-child-and-adolescent-mental-health-services-project-results-published (accessed 25 July 2023) |
| 34625073 | Background | Hansen AS, Christoffersen CH, Telleus GK, Lauritsen MB. Referral patterns to outpatient child and adolescent mental health services and factors associated with referrals being rejected. A cross-sectional observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 8;21(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07114-8. |
| Background | 21. Patalay, P. and Fitzsimons, E., 2017. Mental ill-health among children of the new century: trends across childhood with a focus on age 14. London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, pp.1-6. URL: http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/shared/get-file.ashx?itemtype=document&id=3338 (accessed 25 July 2023) |
| Background | 22. Frith E. Access and waiting times in children and young people's mental health services. (2017). URL: https://epi.org.uk/wp- content/uploads/2018/01/EPI_Access-and-waiting-times_.pdf (accessed 25 July 2023) |
| Background | 23. Frith, E., 2016. Progress and challenges in the transformation of children and young people's mental health care. Education Policy Institute, London. URL:https://epi.org.uk/wp- content/uploads/2018/01/progress-and-challenges.pdf (accessed 25 July 2023) |
| Background | 24. Scottish Government (2018). URL: https://www.gov.scot/publications/rejected-referrals-child- adolescent-mental-health-services-camhs-qualitative-quantitative/pages/3/ (accessed 25 July 2023) |
| Background | 25. Care Quality Commission (CQC) (2018). URL: https://www.cqc.org.uk/publications/themed-work/are-we-listening-review-children-young-peoples-mental-health-services (accessed 25 July 2023) |
| 33951078 | Background | Fazel M, Rocks S, Glogowska M, Stepney M, Tsiachristas A. How does reorganisation in child and adolescent mental health services affect access to services? An observational study of two services in England. PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0250691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250691. eCollection 2021. |
| 32641117 | Background | Rocks S, Glogowska M, Stepney M, Tsiachristas A, Fazel M. Introducing a single point of access (SPA) to child and adolescent mental health services in England: a mixed-methods observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05463-4. |
| Background | 28. The Children and Young People's Mental Health Taskforce. (2015). URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/414024/Childrens_Mental_Health.pdf (accessed 25 July 2023) |
| Background | 29. The MoSCow Method (2023). URL: https://www.mindtools.com/a4xmovt/the-moscow-method (accessed 25 June 2023) |
| Background | 30. System usability scale. URL: https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system- usability-scale.html (accessed 14 March 2023) |
| Background | 31. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/ (accessed 20 May 2024) |
| 32401224 | Background | Greenhalgh T, Maylor H, Shaw S, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Betton V, Nelissen N, Gremyr A, Rushforth A, Koshkouei M, Taylor J. The NASSS-CAT Tools for Understanding, Guiding, Monitoring, and Researching Technology Implementation Projects in Health and Social Care: Protocol for an Evaluation Study in Real-World Settings. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 May 13;9(5):e16861. doi: 10.2196/16861. |
| 20961442 | Background | Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Finch T, Kennedy A, Mair F, O'Donnell C, Ong BN, Rapley T, Rogers A, May C. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:63. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63. |
| Background | 34. NHS BaRS standard (2023). URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/booking-and-referral-standard (accessed 25 June 2023) |
| Background | 35. NHS App (2023. URL: https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-app/about-the-nhs-app/ (accessed 25 June 2023) |
| 29092808 | Background | Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A'Court C, Hinder S, Fahy N, Procter R, Shaw S. Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):e367. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8775. |
| Background | 37. Agile delivery (2023). URL: https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery (accessed 25 June 2023) |
| Background | 38. How the discovery phase works (2021). URL: https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/how-the-discovery-phase-works (accessed 25 June 2023) |
| Background | 39. How the alpha phase works (2019). URL: https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/how-the-alpha-phase-works (accessed 25 June 2023) |
| Background | 40. How the beta phase works (2021). URL: https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/how-the-beta-phase-works (accessed 25 June 2023) |
| Background | 41. How the live phase works (2019). URL: https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/how-the-live-phase-works (accessed 25 June 2023) |
| 30767905 | Background | Miller S, Ainsworth B, Yardley L, Milton A, Weal M, Smith P, Morrison L. A Framework for Analyzing and Measuring Usage and Engagement Data (AMUsED) in Digital Interventions: Viewpoint. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 15;21(2):e10966. doi: 10.2196/10966. |
| Background | 43. Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L., 2002. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173-194). Routledge. |
| Background | 44. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C.M. and Ormston, R. eds., 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. sage. |
| Background | 45. Nvivo 11 (n.d.). URL: https://help - nv11.qsrinternational.com/desktop/concepts/about_framework_matrices.htm (accessed 25 June 2023). |
| GM.Digital Research Unit website for project updates | View source |