Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Aga Khan University | OTHER |
| University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A parallel group randomized controlled trial using a superiority framework. Clinical vignettes will be used to assess the impact of a large language model on the clinical reasoning of physicians. Quantitative analyses will be performed on graded vignette responses.
This study is a multi-country, parallel-group randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether access to a large language model (LLM) improves physician clinical decision-making. The trial uses a superiority framework and compares physicians randomized to either complete standardized clinical vignettes with access to GPT-4o or without any AI assistance.
Clinical vignettes simulate common primary care conditions such as cardiovascular, respiratory, musculoskeletal, fatigue-related, and infectious diseases. Each vignette includes multiple steps in the clinical reasoning process, from initial history-taking to diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Physician responses are graded using rubrics developed from evidence-based, context-specific best-practice guidelines.
The study is conducted across three countries-Indonesia, Kenya, and the Netherlands-representing different income levels and health system contexts. The primary outcome is performance on clinical vignettes, defined as adherence to best-practice guidelines. Secondary objectives include examining cross-country variation in physician performance, variation in performance distributions, and the role of engagement with the LLM in shaping outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Own Knowlege | No Intervention | Group will not be given access to GPT-4 or other online resources | |
| GPT-4o | Active Comparator | Group given GPT-4o access |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | Other | GPT-4o provided via an iFrame in the online Qualtrics environment |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Correct Score | Following Peabody et al (2000), the primary outcome is a percentage correct score across all steps in a vignette. This is generated by dividing the weighted total sum of rubric items assessed as present by the total number of rubric items possible in a vignette. Rubric items will be weighted with regards to their relevance by our expert panel. | During Evaluation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Per Answer | This outcome is generated as the average weight of rubric items assessed as present across vignettes. As each item is provided a weight (0.33,0.5,1), the average weight is the sum of weights divided by the number of answers marked as present. | During Evaluation |
| Number of Answers |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Levels, PhD | Maastricht University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universitas Indonesia | Jakarta | Indonesia | ||||
| Aga Khan University Hospital |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004194 | Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
We designed clinical vignettes to simulate patient-physician consultations. We follow the structure of clinical performance and value vignettes, a vignette design validated to perform well against standard patient designs. Our vignette design follows 9 stages:
(1) Presenting Problem & Initial Differential Diagnosis, (2) Asking about patient history, (3) Additional Differential Diagnosis, (4) Listing Physical Exams, (5) Differential Diagnosis, (6) Additional diagnostic (Lab) Tests, (7) Final Differential Diagnosis, (8) Medication, (9) Follow-Up/Advice.
Participants were randomly assigned either to the control or intervention group using simple randomization and asked to complete the vignettes in an online environment. Intervention group participants were given access to an LLM (GPT-4o)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This outcome is generated as the count of the total number of answers assessed as present by reviewers per vignette |
| During evaluation |
| Less obvious answers | This outcome is generated as the number of answers given that are less obvious, i.e. mentioned less frequently by the control group. If the answer is mentioned by 25% or less of the control group, it is considered less obvious. | During evaluation |
| Nairobi |
| Kenya |
| Maastricht University | Maastricht | Netherlands |