Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Massive prostheses are the standard treatment for extensive bone loss, whether caused by cancer or other factors (complex fractures, multiple revisions, infections).
The emergence of modular systems such as the Pantheon range provides rapid restoration of function and precise intraoperative adaptation to anatomical constraints and specific bone loss characteristics.
The Pantheon range also offers an innovative intramedullary ring system that promotes osseointegration and potentially long-term mechanical stability of implants.
However, few studies have evaluated its clinical efficacy. In this context, a prospective cohort study is warranted in order to obtain robust data on implant survival, patient quality of life and predictors of medium- and long-term complications.
The IMPULSION study is an observational study. The primary objective is to evaluate prosthesis survival within 5 years post-operatively.
The secondary objectives are: to evaluate functional outcomes, quality of life, the occurrence of complications, and the osseointegration of the intramedullary ring.
Patients are included during the consultation to plan the surgery. Following surgery, the patient is followed up at 1 year, 2 years and 5 years post-operatively.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Femur reconstruction Proximal (PFR)/Distal (DFR)/Total (TFR), Proximal Tibia (PTR), Custom implants | Massive prosthetic reconstruction using the Pantheon prosthesis from Adler Laboratories. The prostheses are:
|
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of prosthesis survival | The survival of the prosthesis is defined by the absence of revision surgery. This objective will be analysed in subgroups according to the type of implant used (PFR, DFR, PTR, TFR) or other implants (hybrid connector, custom-made). | 1 year, 2 years and 5 years post-operative |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of functional outcomes | MSTS score collected at inclusion, then post-operatively: 1 year after surgery (Y1), 2 years (Y2) and 5 years (Y5) As with the main objective, these objectives will be analysed in subgroups according to the type of implant used (PFR,DFR,PTR,TFR) or other implants (hybrid connector, custom-made). | 1 year after surgery (Y1), 2 years (Y2) and 5 years (Y5) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Implants from the Pantheon prosthesis:
Proximal Femur Recontruction (PFR) Distal Femur Reconstruction (DFR) Proximal Tibia Reconstruction (PTR) Total Femur Reconstruction (TFR) Hybrid connector implants Custom-made implants
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The population concerns patients with massive bone loss, because of oncological or non-oncological issue. Patients have massive prosthetic reconstruction using the Pantheon prosthesis from Adler Laboratories. The prostheses are:
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent CRENN, PU-PH | Contact | +33 2 44 76 80 58 | Vincent.Crenn@univ-nantes.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vincent CRENN, PU-PH | Nantes University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Nantes | Nantes | 44093 | France |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Evaluation of quality of life | EQ-5D-5L auto-questionnaire at inclusion, then post-operatively: 1 year after surgery (Y1), 2 years (Y2) and 5 years (Y5) As with the main objective, these objectives will be analysed in subgroups according to the type of implant used (PFR,DFR,PTR,TFR) or other implants (hybrid connector, custom-made). | 1 year after surgery (Y1), 2 years (Y2) and 5 years (Y5) |
| Evaluation of complications occurring within 5 years post-operatively | Complications coded according to the Henderson classification within 5 years post-operatively As with the main objective, these objectives will be analysed in subgroups according to the type of implant used (PFR,DFR,PTR,TFR) or other implants (hybrid connector, custom-made). | 1 year after surgery (Y1), 2 years (Y2) and 5 years (Y5) |
| Evaluation of osseointegration of the intramedullary ring | Radiographic analysis 1 year after surgery (Y1), 2 years (Y2) and 5 years (Y5) (4 cortical images on front and profile views): osseointegration Yes/No/Don't know As with the main objective, these objectives will be analysed in subgroups according to the type of implant used (PFR,DFR,PTR,TFR) or other implants (hybrid connector, custom-made). | 1 year after surgery (Y1), 2 years (Y2) and 5 years (Y5) |