Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Many of studies have been performed to improve osseointegration and bone density around implants by modifying the implant by adding bone graft or substitute material that increase success of implant. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically the efficacy of injectable bone graft versus ozonated olive oil gel to promote bone formation and improve outcomes in immediate implant cases. 16 immediate implants will be placed in mandibular premolar region the study will be devided equally and randomlly into two groups , Group 1: it will be 8 immediate implants represent the control group were the implants will be placed with injectable bone graft , Group 2: will be 8 immediate implant represent the study group were the implants will be placed with ozonated olive oil gel be used as a graft material . The implant stability will be assessed clinically using Ostell , and the bone density will be assed radiographically .
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Control Group) | Active Comparator | 8 implants were inserted immediately after teeth extraction with grafting of injectable β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) bone graft around the implant. |
|
| Group II (Study Group) | Experimental | 8 implants were inserted immediately after teeth extraction with grafting of ozonated olive oil gel around the implant. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate implant placement | Procedure | Placement of a dental implant immediately after tooth extraction in the mandibular premolar region following standard surgical protocol. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Stability (ISQ) | Osstell enables precise and objective monitoring of osseointegration and implant stability through non-invasive measurements. A cable-connected probe requires a smart peg to be securely attached to the implant. When using the device, it should be held at a right angle to the implant, with a maximum deviation of 45 degrees and a distance of 0.6-2.5 mm from the test surface. The implant stability is measured using the ISQ scale, ranging from 1 to 100, where values above 70 indicate strong stability, 60-69 indicate medium stability, and lower values suggest lower stability. Measurements are taken immediately postoperatively and reassessed after 6 months for final stability confirmation. | Baseline, and 6 months postoperatively |
| Bone density | Direct paralleling digital periapical radiographs were obtained using the KaVo Scan eXam™ One system and the Rinn extension cone paralleling device. The KaVo system employs a thin, flexible, wireless phosphorescent imaging plate, and the imaging plate size 2 has a specific active surface area and resolution. A long cone was attached to the x-ray tube, and fixed exposure parameters were applied throughout the study. Radiographic assessments occurred immediately post-operative and after 3 and 6 months. Image analysis utilized IDRISI Kilimanjaro software for restoration, enhancement, and densitometric measurements. This software uniquely monitored changes in bone density in two zones: the osseointegration zone near the implant border and the surrounding bone interface. | Baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS) | The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a widely utilized instrument for quantifying pain intensity in clinical settings. It features a 10-centimeter horizontal line marked at both ends to represent the range of possible pain experiences, where one end is typically labeled "no pain" and the opposite end may carry descriptors such as "unimaginably unspeakable pain." Patients are instructed to indicate their pain level by placing a mark on the line that corresponds to their current pain experience. The measurement in centimeters from the "no pain" endpoint to the patient's designated point provides a straightforward numerical representation of pain severity. This method is favored for its simplicity and its ability to yield quantifiable data, facilitating better pain assessment and management in various medical contexts. |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Said Hamed, Professor | Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry - Suez Canal University | Study Chair |
| Shimaa Abdallah Metawea, B.D.S | Dentist at Ministry of Health and Population | Principal Investigator |
| Ahmed Mohamed El Rawdy, Professor | Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry - Suez Canal University | Study Director |
| Ahmed Abd elmohsen Younis, Assistant. Professor | Assistant. Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry - Suez Canal University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suez Canal University, Faculty of Dentistry | Ismailia | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19040437 | Background | Botticelli D, Renzi A, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Implants in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective 5-year follow-up clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1226-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01620.x. | |
| 24049221 | Background | Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Apr;35(2):121-6. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D035061 | Control Groups |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015340 | Epidemiologic Research Design |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D012107 | Research Design |
Not provided
Not provided
16 immediate implants will be placed in the mandibular premolar region, divided randomly into two groups: Group 1 (control) will use injectable bone graft for 8 implants, while Group 2 (study) will use ozonated olive oil gel as graft material for the other 8 implants.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| β-tricalcium phosphate Injectable Bone Graft | Biological | Immediate implant placement in the mandibular premolar region with application of injectable bone graft material to the peri-implant defect. |
|
|
| Ozonated olive oil gel | Biological | Immediate implant placement in the mandibular premolar region with application of ozonated olive oil gel to the peri-implant defect. |
|
|
| Days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively |
| Visual Scale of Edema | Facial edema was assessed using a clinical grading scale based on visual inspection and palpation, classifying it into four severity categories: No Edema (normal contours and symmetry), Low-grade Edema (mild swelling without functional limitations), Intermediate-grade Edema (moderate swelling with visible asymmetry and slight discomfort), and High-grade Edema (pronounced swelling with evident asymmetry and significant functional interference). | Days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively |
| Background | Abas, M., Ghanem, W., El Desouky, G., El Gerby, Y. (2021). 'Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant with Bone Graft (Hyprooss)', Dental Science Updates, 2(1), pp. 17-25. |
| 39563399 | Result | Barone S, Zaffino P, Salviati M, Destito M, Antonelli A, Bennardo F, Cevidanes L, Spadea MF, Giudice A. Automated pipeline for linear and volumetric assessment of facial swelling after third molar surgery. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):1404. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05193-7. |
| D008722 | Methods |