Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ProSciento, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether Insulex® R demonstrates similar pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles compared to Humulin® R after a single subcutaneous dose of 0.3 units/kg in healthy adult volunteers.
This Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, two-period, two-sequence crossover clinical trial aims to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence of Insulex® R compared to Humulin® R after a single subcutaneous dose of 0.3 units/kg in healthy adult subjects. The study was designed in accordance with international regulatory guidelines, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for demonstrating biosimilarity of insulin products and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines for the clinical development of biosimilar insulins. Each subject underwent a Screening Visit (Visit 1), two 1-day in-house Treatment Periods (Visit 2 and Visit 3), and a Follow-up Visit (Visit 4) to performed safety procedures. The washout period between Treatment Periods was 7 to 14 days. During each Treatment Period, subjects will receive a single subcutaneous dose of either Insulex® R or Humulin® R under euglycemic glucose clamp conditions. Blood samples will be collected at prespecified intervals to measure serum insulin and C-peptide concentrations. Glucose infusion rates will be monitored continuously to assess PD response. The rigorous assessment of PK and PD profiles under controlled clamp conditions is essential to confirm biosimilarity and ensure therapeutic equivalence. Successful demonstration of bioequivalence will provide a safe, effective, and cost-accessible recombinant human rapid-acting insulin option for patients requiring insulin therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insulex® R | Experimental | Soluble human insulin, biosimilar, 100 IU/mL, single subcutaneous injection of 0.3 IU/kg body weight |
|
| Humulin® R | Active Comparator | Soluble human insulin, biosimilar, 100 IU/mL, single subcutaneous injection of 0.3 IU/kg body weight |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insulex® R (soluble human insulin, biosimilar) | Drug | Investigational insulin, Insulex® R (soluble human insulin, biosimilar) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AUCINS_0-12h | Area under the insulin concentration - time curve (AUC) from 0 to 12 hours; primary endpoint to assess PK profile according EMA guideline | 12 hours |
| Cmax | Maximum insulin concentration; primary endpoint to assess the PK profile according EMA guideline | 12 hours |
| AUCGIR_0-12h | Area under the glucose infusion rate (GIR) time curve from 0 to 12 hours; primary endpoint to assess the PD profile according EMA guideline | 12 hours |
| GIRmax | Maximum Glucose Infusion Rate; primary endpoint to assess PD profile according EMA guideline | 12 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AUCINS_0-2h | Area under the partial insulin concentration - time curves (AUC) from 0 to 4 hours; to assess PK profile | 4 hours |
| AUCINS_0-6h | Area under the partial insulin concentration - time curves (AUC) from 0 to 6 hours, to assess PK profile |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prosciento, Inc | San Diego | California | 92121 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12734137 | Background | DeWitt DE, Hirsch IB. Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: scientific review. JAMA. 2003 May 7;289(17):2254-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.17.2254. | |
| 382871 | Background | DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 1979 Sep;237(3):E214-23. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1979.237.3.E214. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
PK/PD euglycemic glucose clamp
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Humulin® R (soluble human insulin, biosimilar) | Drug | Marketed reference insulin, Humulin® R (soluble human insulin, biosimilar) |
|
| 6 hours |
| AUCINS_6-12h | Area under the partial insulin concentration - time curves (AUC) from 6 to 12 hours; to assess PK profile | 6 hours |
| AUCINS_0-∞ | Area under the serum insulin concentration curve from 0 to infinity (if possible); to assess PK profile | 12 hours |
| Tmax | Time to maximum insulin concentration; to assess PK profile | 12 hours |
| t50%-INS (early) | Time to half-maximum insulin concentration before maximum insulin concentration (Cmax); to assess PK profile | 12 hours |
| t50%-INS (late) | Time to half-maximum insulin concentration after maximum insulin concentration(Cmax); to assess PK profile | 12 hours |
| t½ | Terminal elimination half - life; to assess PK profile | 12 hours |
| λz | Terminal elimination rate constant; to assess PK profile | 12 hours |
| AUCGIR_0-2h | Area under glucose infusion rate (GIR) time curve from 0 to 2 hours; to assess PD profile | 2 hours |
| AUCGIR_0-6h | Area under glucose infusion rate (GIR) time curve from 0 to 6 hours; to assess PD profile | 6 hours |
| AUCGIR_6-12h | Area under glucose infusion rate (GIR) time curve from 6 to 12 hours; to assess PD profile | 6 hours |
| tGIR_max | Time to maximum glucose infusion rate (GIR); to assess PD profile | 12 hours |
| t50%-GIR (early) | Time to half - maximum glucose infusion rate (GIR) before maximum glucose infusion rate (GIRmax); to assess PD profile | 12 hours |
| t50%-GIR (late) | Time to half - maximum glucose infusion rate (GIR) after maximum glucose infusion rate (GIRmax); to assess PD profile | 12 hours |
| tGIR_onset | Time to start of glucose infusion rate (GIR) post - dose; to assess PD profile | 12 hours |
| Adverse Events | The number and percentage of subjects with TEAEs will be summarized by MedDRA-coded SOCs and PTs. All TEAEs will be assessed for severity and for relation to study drug. | From screening to follow-up visit (up to 30 days after Visit 1) |
| Number of participants with clinical findings on physical examination from baseline (screening) to follow-up visit. | Physical examination findings considered clinically significant by the PI will be summarized by body system with counts and percentages of subjects for values at treatment visits. | From screening to follow-up visit (up to 30 days after Visit 1) |
| Number of participants with significant changes observed from baseline (screening) to follow-up visit in safety laboratory results (hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis) for each analite. | Value outside the normal range (as defined by the laboratory) or deemed clinically significant at the Investigator's discretion in safety laboratory results (hematology, serum chemistry, urinalysis) will be recorded and reported as the number of participants with significant changes in safety laboratoriy results. | From screening to follow-up visit (up to 30 days after Visit 1) |
| Number of participants with significant changes observed from baseline (screening) to follow-up visit in ECG parameters. | The following parameters will be recorded from thsubject's ECG trace as calculated by the machine algorithm: heart rate, QT interval, PR interval, QRS interval, RR interval, and QTc (corrected) using the Fridericia correction. | From screening to follow-up visit (up to 30 days after Visit 1) |
| Injection site reactions | Evaluated quantitatively using the Grading Scale for Injection Site Reaction (based on the Guidance for Industry-Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials, 2007); which assesses pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, and swelling on a four-point scale: Grade 1 - Mild (does not interfere with activity), Grade 2 - Moderate (interferes with activity/discomfort when moving), Grade 3 - Severe (significant discomfort at rest), and Grade 4 - Potentially Life Threatening (Emergency Room visit or hospitalization). For erythema and swelling, the local reaction measured at the single largest diameter should be recorded. . | From screening to follow-up visit (up to 30 days after Visit 1) |
| Number of participants with significant changes observed from baseline (screening) to follow-up visit in body temperature. | Body temperature in °C. Any clinically significant findings at the investigator's discretion and/or outside the range identified for the vital sign assessment. | From screening to follow-up visit (up to 30 days after Visit 1) |
| Number of participants with significant changes observed from baseline (screening) to follow-up visit in blood pressure. | Given by the measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in mmHg. Any clinically significant findings at the investigator's discretion and/or outside the range identified for the vital sign assessment. | From screening to follow-up visit (up to 30 days after Visit 1) |
| Number of participants with significant changes observed from baseline (screening) to follow-up visit in heart rate. | Reading taken in beats per minute (bpm) obtained from the oximeter placed on the tip of the index finger. Any clinically significant findings at the investigator's discretion and/or outside the range identified for the vital sign assessment. | From screening to follow-up visit (up to 30 days after Visit 1). |
| Number of participants with significant changes observed from baseline (screening) to follow-up visit in respiratory rate. | Reading taken in breaths per minute (bpm) obtained from the oximeter placed on the tip of the index finger. Any clinically significant findings at the investigator's discretion and/or outside the range identified for the vital sign assessment. | From screening to follow-up visit (up to 30 days after Visit 1). |
| 8299470 | Background | Chance RE, Frank BH. Research, development, production, and safety of biosynthetic human insulin. Diabetes Care. 1993 Dec;16 Suppl 3:133-42. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.3.133. |
| 10146588 | Result | Vocelka CR, Burdge EC, Kunzelman KS, Thomas R, Verrier ED. An in vitro protocol for evaluation and comparison of membrane oxygenators. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1993;25(4):161-6. |
| 9303355 | Result | Yamada N, Chung YS, Takatsuka S, Arimoto Y, Sawada T, Dohi T, Sowa M. Increased sialyl Lewis A expression and fucosyltransferase activity with acquisition of a high metastatic capacity in a colon cancer cell line. Br J Cancer. 1997;76(5):582-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.429. |
| 5813452 | Result | Colombo TJ, Saward EW, Greenlick MR. The integration of an OEO health program into a prepaid comprehensive group practice plan. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1969 Apr;59(4):641-50. doi: 10.2105/ajph.59.4.641. No abstract available. |
| 16389894 | Result | Guerci B, Sauvanet JP. Subcutaneous insulin: pharmacokinetic variability and glycemic variability. Diabetes Metab. 2005 Sep;31(4 Pt 2):4S7-4S24. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(05)88263-1. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059451 | Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001688 | Biological Products |
| D045424 | Complex Mixtures |
Not provided
Not provided