Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A bronchodilator reversibility test is widely used in the diagnosis and management of obstructive lung diseases.
Bronchodilators relieve symptoms in asthma and COPD. Traditionally, their effectiveness has been assessed using spirometric indices, particularly FEV₁. However, changes in FEV₁ often do not correlate well with patients' subjective experience of dyspnoea relief or with changes in small airway function.
Impulse oscillometry (IOS) provides an effort-independent assessment of respiratory mechanics during tidal breathing and is more sensitive to small airway dysfunction than spirometry. Despite this, the clinical utility of IOS in routine COPD and asthma assessment remains underexplored, and its relationship to both spirometric response and symptom relief is not fully established, and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for IOS parameters has not been firmly established. Determining the MCID is essential for interpreting individual patient responses in a clinically meaningful way and for guiding treatment decisions in both research and practice.
Hypothesis & Aims
In patients with either asthma or COPD baseline values and bronchodilator responses are compared. More specifically, this study aims to:
Introduction and aims: see brief summary.
Method and Patients This is a real-life, cross-sectional analysis of a single-centered, observational study on 60 adult patients with clinical diagnosed asthma and 60 COPD patients, consecutively recruited between February 1, 2026, and June 30, 2027, and followed at least 6 months for diagnostic clarification.
Inclusion Criteria:
Both asthma and COPD patients:
Asthma: Doctor diagnosed asthma 1. less than 10 packyears.
COPD: Doctor diagnosed COPD with FEV1/FVC <0.7 post-bronchodilation
1. Smokers or ex-smokers with ≥10 packyears
Exclusion Criteria:
It is a real-life study where most patients are followed up within 6 months. The diagnosis - asthma, COPD, or other condition - may change after follow-up (maximum 6 months after the index examination).
Minimal Clinical Important Difference
Anchor-Based Methods:
Distribution-Based Methods:
Brochodilator test and order of test To avoid or minimize the effect of deep inhalation on IOS, IOS was performed at least 15 minutes after spirometry and body box.
Patients were administered 4 doses of 0.1 mg Ventoline (salbutamol) via pressurized metered-dose inhaler and spacer (Aero Champer). Post-IOS and post-spirometry were performed 15-20 minutes after the bronchodilator inhalation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asthma | FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) <0.7 at baseline (7) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) dyspnea score ≥10 (0-100, 100 max) (25,26). Doctor diagnosed asthma Less than 10 packyears. Exclusion Criteria:
|
| |
| COPD | FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) <0.7 at baseline (7) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) dyspnea score ≥10 (0-100, 100 max) (25,26). Doctor diagnosed COPD Smokers or ex-smokers with ≥10 packyears Exclusion Criteria:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronchodilator | Diagnostic Test | Classic beta-2-reversibility test |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| FEV1 | Forced expiratory volumen in one second, L and % predicted | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| X5 | Reactance at 5 Hz; kPa/L/s | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| Dyspnoea | Visual analog scale (0-100); 0 means no dyspnoea, and 100 means maximum dyspnoea | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| R5 | Resistance at 5 Hz, kPa/L/s and % predicted | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| R5-R20 | Resistance in small airways, kPa/L/s |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Both asthma and COPD patients:
Asthma: Doctor diagnosed asthma
1. less than 10 packyears.
COPD: Doctor diagnosed COPD with FEV1/FVC <0.7 post-bronchodilation 1. Smokers or ex-smokers with ≥10 packyears
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
referred to Allergy and Lung Clinic Elsinore, Denmark for evaluation of Asthma and COPD (obstructive lung disease)
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas J Ringbæk, MSci | Contact | +4521969087 | thomasringbaek@gmail.com | |
| Lars Frølund, MSci | Contact | +4521777696 | lars.froelund@dadlnet.dk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas J Ringbæk, MSci | Allergi og Lungeklinikken Helsingør | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38190497 | Background | Halpin DMG. Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Time to Stop Chasing Shadows. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 15;209(4):349-351. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202312-2248ED. No abstract available. | |
| 28416951 | Background | Sim YS, Lee JH, Lee WY, Suh DI, Oh YM, Yoon JS, Lee JH, Cho JH, Kwon CS, Chang JH. Spirometry and Bronchodilator Test. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2017 Apr;80(2):105-112. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.80.2.105. Epub 2017 Mar 31. |
Not provided
Not provided
I have not applied for permission to share data with others.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D029424 | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
| D001249 | Asthma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008173 | Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| Fres | Resonant frequency (stiffness), Hz | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| AX | Area of reactance, kPa/L | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| Delta-X5 | Inspiratory - expiratory difference in X5, kPa/L/s | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| Delta R5 | Inspiratory - expiratory difference in R5 (total resitance), kPa/L/s | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| FEF 25-75 | Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% during spirometry, L and % predicted | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| FEV1/FVC-ratio | FEV1/forced expiratory capacity (FVC) | Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg |
| 28579768 | Background | Dean J, Kolsum U, Hitchen P, Gupta V, Singh D. Clinical characteristics of COPD patients with tidal expiratory flow limitation. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 May 22;12:1503-1506. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S137865. eCollection 2017. |
| 20335298 | Background | Paredi P, Goldman M, Alamen A, Ausin P, Usmani OS, Pride NB, Barnes PJ. Comparison of inspiratory and expiratory resistance and reactance in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2010 Mar;65(3):263-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.120790. |
| 34854345 | Background | Bloom DA, Kaplan DJ, Mojica E, Strauss EJ, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Campbell KA, Alaia MJ, Jazrawi LM. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance. Am J Sports Med. 2023 Feb;51(2):520-524. doi: 10.1177/03635465211053869. Epub 2021 Dec 2. |
| 26770777 | Background | Saadeh C, Saadeh C, Cross B, Gaylor M, Griffith M. Advantage of impulse oscillometry over spirometry to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and monitor pulmonary responses to bronchodilators: An observational study. SAGE Open Med. 2015 Apr 6;3:2050312115578957. doi: 10.1177/2050312115578957. eCollection 2015. |
| 31982392 | Background | Cottee AM, Seccombe LM, Thamrin C, King GG, Peters MJ, Farah CS. Bronchodilator Response Assessed by the Forced Oscillation Technique Identifies Poor Asthma Control With Greater Sensitivity Than Spirometry. Chest. 2020 Jun;157(6):1435-1441. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.035. Epub 2020 Jan 23. |
| 39383941 | Background | Greig R, Stewart K, Chan R, Lipworth B. Assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness using low-frequency impedance in type 2-high uncontrolled severe asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2025 Feb;134(2):231-232. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2024.10.011. Epub 2024 Oct 9. No abstract available. |
| 35140105 | Background | Kaminsky DA, Simpson SJ, Berger KI, Calverley P, de Melo PL, Dandurand R, Dellaca RL, Farah CS, Farre R, Hall GL, Ioan I, Irvin CG, Kaczka DW, King GG, Kurosawa H, Lombardi E, Maksym GN, Marchal F, Oostveen E, Oppenheimer BW, Robinson PD, van den Berge M, Thamrin C. Clinical significance and applications of oscillometry. Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Feb 9;31(163):210208. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0208-2021. Print 2022 Mar 31. |
| 31772002 | Background | King GG, Bates J, Berger KI, Calverley P, de Melo PL, Dellaca RL, Farre R, Hall GL, Ioan I, Irvin CG, Kaczka DW, Kaminsky DA, Kurosawa H, Lombardi E, Maksym GN, Marchal F, Oppenheimer BW, Simpson SJ, Thamrin C, van den Berge M, Oostveen E. Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry. Eur Respir J. 2020 Feb 27;55(2):1900753. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00753-2019. Print 2020 Feb. |
| 18836213 | Background | Tashkin DP, Celli B, Senn S, Burkhart D, Kesten S, Menjoge S, Decramer M; UPLIFT Study Investigators. A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1543-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805800. Epub 2008 Oct 5. |
| 31221806 | Background | Janson C, Malinovschi A, Amaral AFS, Accordini S, Bousquet J, Buist AS, Canonica GW, Dahlen B, Garcia-Aymerich J, Gnatiuc L, Kowalski ML, Patel J, Tan W, Toren K, Zuberbier T, Burney P, Jarvis D. Bronchodilator reversibility in asthma and COPD: findings from three large population studies. Eur Respir J. 2019 Sep 5;54(3):1900561. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00561-2019. Print 2019 Sep. |
| 31774318 | Background | Kaminsky DA. What Is a Significant Bronchodilator Response? Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Dec;16(12):1495-1497. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201908-604ED. No abstract available. |
| 38029294 | Background | Beasley R, Hughes R, Agusti A, Calverley P, Chipps B, Del Olmo R, Papi A, Price D, Reddel H, Mullerova H, Rapsomaniki E. Prevalence, Diagnostic Utility and Associated Characteristics of Bronchodilator Responsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 15;209(4):390-401. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202308-1436OC. |
| 35707948 | Background | Chan R, Lipworth BJ. Oscillometry bronchodilator response in adult moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma patients: A prospective cohort study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2022 Sep;52(9):1118-1120. doi: 10.1111/cea.14185. Epub 2022 Jun 22. No abstract available. |
| D020969 |
| Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001982 | Bronchial Diseases |
| D012130 | Respiratory Hypersensitivity |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |