Impact of Preserving Versus Ligating the Right Gastric Artery on Anastomotic Outcomes After McKeown Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Impact of Preserving Versus Ligating the Right Gastric Artery on Anastomotic Outcomes After McKeown Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomized controlled trial evaluates the impact of preserving versus ligating the Right Gastric Artery (RGA) on postoperative anastomotic complications in patients undergoing McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Specifically, the study compares the incidence of anastomotic leakage and stenosis between two groups of patients reconstructed with a 3cm-wide gastric conduit.
Anastomotic leakage (AL) and benign anastomotic stenosis (BAS) are critical complications following McKeown MIE. While the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) is the primary blood supply for the gastric conduit, the role of the Right Gastric Artery (RGA) remains controversial. Some evidence suggests preserving the RGA may improve perfusion to the proximal gastric conduit, potentially reducing ischemic complications. In this single-center prospective RCT, 120 eligible patients were randomized 1:1 into an RGA Preservation Group (Group A) and an RGA Ligation Group (Group B). Both groups underwent reconstruction with a narrow (3cm) gastric conduit. The study aims to provide evidence on whether RGA preservation improves hemodynamic outcomes as manifested by reduced leakage and stenosis rates.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: