Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective of this randomized, multicenter, international, open-label clinical trial is to demonstrate that, in the context of percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary artery disease, a SeQuent® SCB interventional strategy is non-inferior to a new-generation
DES strategy in terms of a 12- and 36-month composite of Target Vessel Failure (TVF), that includes:
Eligible subjects will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive treatment of all lesions with either the SeQuent® SCB-based strategy or a DES-based strategy. The randomization will be performed prior to the index procedure once signed informed consent has been obtained and all eligibility criteria have been confirmed.
All Subjects will be followed for clinical outcomes at 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years. A subset of 138 randomized patients will undergo control angiography after one-year clinical follow-up (+1 month). An independent core laboratory will analyze all baseline angiograms.
If, at 36 months, the non-inferiority of the SeQuent® SCB strategy compared to the DES strategy is achieved, superiority in terms of TVF and BARC Type 3-5 bleeding will be tested.
An optional extension of follow-up to 6 years may be implemented based on interim results and the joint decision of the Steering Committee and the Sponsor. Details regarding this optional extension are provided in the Clinical Investigation Plan.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeQuent® SCB-based strategy | Active Comparator | all target lesions should be treated with the SeQuent® SCB after adequate lesion preparation. If the angiographic result is unacceptable following lesion preparation or after DCB treatment (e.g., flow-limiting dissection or residual stenosis >30%), additional therapeutic steps should be considered. For non-left main bifurcation lesions, if the side branch requires treatment, it should also be treated with the SeQuent® SCB after adequate lesion preparation. If an unacceptable angiographic result, defined as >70% residual stenosis or major recoil at the side branch ostium, is obtained, or if there is an imminent risk of vessel compromise, further therapeutic steps are required. Those steps may include optimized lesion preparation to avoid DES implantation; however, DES may be implanted if all other attempts fail. |
|
| DES-based strategy | Active Comparator | all target lesions should be treated with DES. The use of DCB in the DES arm is strongly discouraged. If DES delivery is not feasible due to anatomical or other reasons, the operator may consider alternative treatments, such as more deliverable DES or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), while keeping the patients in the DES group. In case of bifurcation treatment, both DES and POBA are allowed. Any use of DCB in the DES arm shall be justified. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCI | Device | PCI with SeQuent® SCB |
| |
| PCI |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite of Target Vessel Failure (TVF) and bleeding according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Types 3-5 | at 12 months (after intervention) | |
| Composite of TVF and bleeding BARC 3-5 | at 36 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite of TVF and bleeding BARC 3-5 | at 3 months | |
| Composite of TVF and bleeding BARC 3-5 | at 24 months | |
| Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DOCE) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject must have at least one of the high clinical or anatomical risk features:
High clinical risk, defined as:
OR
High anatomical risk lesions requiring treatment as follows:
In the case of multivessel (MV) disease, multiple vessels can be treated provided that all lesions are amenable to treatment with either DCB or DES and vessel size at the site of the lesion is >2.0 mm by visual assessment.
The trial does not restrict the number of target lesions. However, the operator should determine that all target lesions intended to be treated must be suitable for treatment with either DES or DCB. For patients randomized to the DCB arm, the likelihood of requiring provisional stenting must be assessed as less than 30% for each lesion requiring treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
Primary PCI (acute STEMI patients)
Cardiogenic shock
Subject enrolled in an active interventional trial
Subject not able or unlikely to comply with the planned follow-ups
Subject who is pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant during the study
Subject not able to give informed consent
Subject under judicial protection, guardianship or curatorship or patient deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision (where applicable)
Subject with a life expectancy <12 months
Subjects with known allergies to antiplatelet agents (e.g., acetylsalicylic acid, P2Y12 inhibitors), anticoagulants (e.g., heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors), iodinated contrast media, or mTOR inhibitors (e.g., sirolimus and related compounds)
Angiographic exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiani Wang, Dr. | Contact | +4915146206456 | Jiani.Wang@bbraun.com | |
| Franziska Greifzu, Dr. | Contact | +4930568207371 | Franziska.Greifzu@bbraun.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universität des Saarlandes - Klinik für Innere Medizin III | Not yet recruiting | Homburg | 66421 | Germany |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
PCI with DES |
|
a composite of cardiovascular death (CV death), device failure-related myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (ci-TLR) |
| at 3 months |
| DOCE | at 12 months |
| DOCE | at 24 months |
| DOCE | at 36 months |
| TVF | at 3 months |
| TVF | at 12 months |
| TVF | at 24 months |
| TVF | at 36 months |
| Patient-oriented Composite endpoint (POCE) | a composite of any death, any MI, any stroke, and any revascularization | at 3 months |
| POCE | at 12 months |
| POCE | at 24 months |
| POCE | at 36 months |
| Any death | at 3 months |
| Any death | at 12 months |
| Any death | at 24 months |
| Any death | at 36 months |
| CV death | at 3 months |
| CV death | at 12 months |
| CV death | at 24 months |
| CV death | at 36 months |
| Cardiac death | at 3 months |
| Cardiac death | at 12 months |
| Cardiac death | at 24 months |
| Cardiac death | at 36 months |
| Any MI | at 3 months |
| Any MI | at 12 months |
| Any MI | at 24 months |
| Any MI | at 36 months |
| Target Vessel-Related MI | at 3 months |
| Target Vessel-Related MI | at 12 months |
| Target Vessel-Related MI | at 24 months |
| Target Vessel-Related MI | at 36 months |
| Peri-procedural MI | as defined by Drug Coated Balloon Academic Research Consortium (DCB ARC) | at 3 months |
| Peri-procedural MI | at 12 months |
| Peri-procedural MI | at 24 months |
| Peri-procedural MI | at 36 months |
| Spontaneous MI | according to 4th Universal Definition of MI | at 3 months |
| Spontaneous MI | at 12 months |
| Spontaneous MI | 24 months |
| Spontaneous MI | at 36 months |
| BARC type ≥2 bleeding | at 3 months |
| BARC type ≥2 bleeding | at 12 months |
| BARC type ≥2 bleeding | at 24 months |
| BARC type ≥2 bleeding | at 36 months |
| BARC 3-5 bleeding | at 3 months |
| BARC 3-5 bleeding | at 12 months |
| BARC 3-5 bleeding | at 24 months |
| BARC 3-5 bleeding | at 36 months |
| Definite stent/lesion thrombosis | at 3 months |
| Definite stent/lesion thrombosis | at 12 months |
| Definite stent/lesion thrombosis | at 24 months |
| Definite stent/lesion thrombosis | at 36 months |
| Stroke | ischemic and hemorrhagic | at 3 months |
| Stroke | at 12 months |
| Stroke | at 24 months |
| Stroke | at 36 months |
| Any TLR | at 3 months |
| Any TLR | at 12 months |
| Any TLR | at 24 months |
| Any TLR | at 36 months |
| ci-TLR | at 3 months |
| ci-TLR | at 12 months |
| ci-TLR | at 24 months |
| ci-TLR | at 36 months |
| Any TVR | at 3 months |
| Any TVR | at 12 months |
| Any TVR | at 24 months |
| Any TVR | at 36 months |
| ci-TVR | at 3 months |
| ci-TVR | at 12 months |
| ci-TVR | at 24 months |
| ci-TVR | at 36 months |
| Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) burden | total duration of DAPT and/or Single Antiplatelet Therapy (SAPT) | at 3 months |
| DAPT burden | at 12 months |
| DAPT burden | at 24 months |
| DAPT burden | at 36 months |
| Hospitalization related to study endpoints | at 3 months |
| Hospitalization related to study endpoints | at 12 months |
| Hospitalization related to study endpoints | at 24 months |
| Hospitalization related to study endpoints | at 36 months |
| Procedure success | defined as Device success and freedom from in-hospital cardiovascular death, TLR, peri-procedural MI, any stroke, and BARC 3 or 5 bleeding | at 3 months |
| Procedure success | at 12 months |
| Procedure success | at 24 months |
| Procedure success | at 36 months |
| Device success (DCB) | defined as successful delivery in time and inflation within 30-60 s of the allocated DCB device at the intended target lesion during an attempt with a DCB not previously used (first use); successful withdrawal of the device system; attainment of a final in-segment or in-lesion residual stenosis of <30% (except in the side branch ostium in nonleft main bifurcation lesions <70%) by visual estimate | at 3 months |
| Device success (DCB) | at 12 months |
| Device success (DCB) | at 24 months |
| Device success (DCB) | at 36 months |
| Device success (DES) | defined as successful delivery, balloon expansion, and deployment of the first assigned DES at the intended target lesion; successful withdrawal of the device delivery system; attainment of a final in-stent residual stenosis of <20% by visual estimate | at 3 months |
| Device success (DES) | at 12 months |
| Device success (DES) | at 24 months |
| Device success (DES) | at 36 months |
| Metal burden | by assessing the total stent length | at 3 months |
| Metal burden | at 12 months |
| Metal burden | at 24 months |
| Metal burden | at 36 months |
| In-segment net gain | Main angiographic endpoint after completion of the 12-month follow-up | assessed between 12 and 13 months |
| Cost-effectiveness of DCB-based vs. DES-based strategy | at 12 months |
| Cost-effectiveness of DCB-based vs. DES-based strategy | at 24 months |
| Cost-effectiveness of DCB-based vs. DES-based strategy | at 36 months |
| University Hospital Basel | Not yet recruiting | Basel | 4031 | Switzerland |
|
| Stadtspital Zürich, Klinik für Kardiologie | Recruiting | Zurich | 8063 | Switzerland |
|
| D001161 |
| Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |