Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare Eosinophilic Esophagitis treatments Eohilia with Dupixent in their effects on diameter and scarring of the esophagus.
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease mediated by environmental allergens and type 2 immune inflammation which causes significant symptoms, food impactions, and stenosis. EoE is associated with significant esophageal stricturing disease. In particular, the odds of developing fibrostenotic disease in EoE more than double per decade of life, and the longer symptoms are present prior to diagnosis and treatment, the higher the likelihood of esophageal strictures being present.
Dupilumab and budesonide oral suspension are key treatments for EoE. Dupilumab was FDA approved for EoE in 2022 and inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signaling which mediate type-2 inflammation and may have an anti-fibrotic effect. IL-13 promotes M2 macrophage polarization, and a recent study showed fibrosis was macrophage-dependent in a mouse model of EoE. Swallowed topical steroids have been used off label in patients with EoE for several years with studies showing effects on improvement in esophageal diameter and reduction in esophageal strictures. The budesonide oral suspension was recently FDA approved in 2024. Further study is needed to understand the effect of these treatments on esophageal stenosis and fibrosis as no clinical trials have compared these treatments or their effects on esophageal diameter to date. Barium esophagram and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are important tools used to measure esophageal diameter in EoE. The investigators hypothesize that dupilumab is superior to topical budesonide oral suspension for its effect on esophagram minimum diameter and FLIP distensibility plateau in EoE patients.
• Primary Efficacy Endpoint:
Alternative Hypothesis: There will be a greater increase in minimum esophageal diameter in patients receiving dupilumab compared to budesonide oral suspension at 12 weeks.
• Secondary Efficacy Endpoint(s):
Alternative Hypothesis: There will be greater distensibility on EndoFLIP topography in patients receiving dupilumab compared to budesonide oral suspension at 12 weeks. Symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histologic severity will be improved in patients receiving dupilumab compared to budesonide oral suspension at 12 weeks. Lamina propria fibrosis and collagen fiber density as determined by second harmonic generation microscopy will be improved in the dupilumab group in comparison to the budesonide oral suspension group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| budesonide oral suspension (Eohilia) | Active Comparator | 2mg twice daily |
|
| dupilumab (Dupixent) | Active Comparator | 300 mg weekly injection |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dupilumab 300 MG/2 ML Subcutaneous Solution [DUPIXENT] | Drug | 300 mg weekly injection |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Esophageal diameter | the minimum esophageal diameter after 12 weeks of treatment. | from enrollment until up to 14 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Distensibility and diameter change | Secondary outcomes will include distensibility and change in minimum diameter as measured by endoFLIP topography | from baseline to end of treatment at 14 weeks |
| EEsAI questionnaire scores |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Snyder, M.D. | Mayo Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Jennifer Horsley-Silva, M.D. | Mayo Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85259 | United States | ||
| Mayo Clinic |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| budesonide oral suspension | Drug | 2mg twice daily |
|
|
comparison of questionnaires that are scored 0-100 before and after treatment.
| from enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Endoscopic refernece score (EREFS) | comparison of EREFs scores on scale of 0-9 at EGDs | from enrollment up to end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Eosinophil counts | number of eosinophils found in biopsy during EGD | from enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Eoe Histologic Scoring system (EoEHSS) | An EoEHSS score is given by looking at a biopsy taken during an endoscopy. The score is based on observation of the appearance of the biopsy under a microscope. Score range is 0 to 1 | from enrollment to end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| M2 macrophage polarization | comparison of myofibroblast differentiation | from enrollment to end of treatment at 12 weeks |
| Lamina propria remodeling | characterizing Lamina propria remodeling by second harmonic imaging microscopy | from enrollment to end of treatment at week 12 |
| Rochester |
| Minnesota |
| 55905 |
| United States |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057765 | Eosinophilic Esophagitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004941 | Esophagitis |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D004802 | Eosinophilia |
| D007960 | Leukocyte Disorders |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C582203 | dupilumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided