Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study offers improvisation training for otolaryngology residents to see if there is any impact on connection, stress, and mood. A control group of otolaryngology residents continues their standard medical education with no improvisation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Improvisation Group | Experimental | Otolaryngology Residents taking Improvisation Training |
|
| Control Group | Active Comparator | This control group of OHNS residents continues their standard medical education. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group Online Improvisation Training | Behavioral | 3 Online Group Improvisation Training classes led by a professional is offered every other week for 1 hour to the experimental cohort. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Connection: Social Connectiveness Scale | Team dynamics and interpersonal connectedness are assessed using the Social Connectedness Scale. This is a custom survey developed specifically for this study to measure participants' sense of belonging and connection within the residency program. The scale consists of 5 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating a greater sense of connectedness (better outcome). | 6 weeks |
| Clinical Decision Making Accuracy and Response Time | Clinical decision-making under pressure is assessed using the "Intraoperative Vignettes" assessment. This is a computer-based cognitive test comprising 20 Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) case scenarios. Participants are presented with clinical scenarios and must select the correct management decision. The outcome is reported as a composite of accuracy (total number of correct responses) and response time (time taken to select an answer). Accuracy is scored from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better clinical decision-making. | 6 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mood (PANAS) | Mood is assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). This is a validated 20-item self-report questionnaire that measures two distinct dimensions of emotion: Positive Affect (10 items) and Negative Affect (10 items). Participants rate items on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Very slightly or not at all) to 5 (Extremely). Scores for each subscale range from 10 to 50.
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Karen Barrett, PhD | University of California, San Francisco | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCSF | San Francisco | California | 94143 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A control arm features OHNS residents who continue their standard medical education. The intervention group features OHNS residents who participate in group improvisation training.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard Medical Education | Other | OHNS residents continue the existing standard medical education. |
|
| 6 weeks |
| Anxiety and Depression (DASS-21) | Psychological distress is measured using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). This is a validated 21-item self-report instrument containing three subscales: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress (7 items per subscale). Participants rate how much each statement applied to them over the past week on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (Did not apply to me at all) to 3 (Applied to me very much or most of the time). Subscale scores are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items and multiplying by 2.
| 6 weeks |
| Intervention Satisfaction Score (Intervention Arm Only) | Participants in the intervention group complete an Intervention Satisfaction Survey to evaluate the curriculum and learner experience. This measure utilizes a Likert scale to assess participant feedback. Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (Not true at all) to 5 (Completely true), with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction (better outcome). | 6 weeks |