Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The rationale of the PROCEDE trial is to explore a novel early detection strategy in which biopsy decision does not rely on one single MRI examination, but on the progression of the MRI lesion between 2 consecutive exams, with the objective of reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies, detection of non-clinically prostate cancer and, ultimately, overtreatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate biopsy | No Intervention | Patients randomized to the standard of care arm will undergo prostate biopsies | |
| MRI surveillance | Experimental | Patients randomized to the experimental arm will proceed with MRI surveillance. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI Examination | Procedure | Patients randomized to the experimental arm will proceed with MRI surveillance. A follow-up visit is planned at 6 months with the result of a PSA test, and it is possible at each investigator's discretion, to prescribe the follow-up MRI at 6 months in case of rising PSA. Otherwise, the repeat MRI will be scheduled one year after the initial MRI. Images will also be sent to the coordinating center for central reviewing of the new MRI exam and assessment of progression. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the impact of a novel early detection strategy based on serial MRI | To evaluate the impact of a novel early detection strategy based on serial MRI exams, compared to the standard of care, on the rate of definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer | at 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To assess the impact of a new early-detection strategy based on repeated MRI | Time to the first event among (i) definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer, defined as one of the following procedures: radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, brachytherapy, focal therapy; (ii) occurrence of prostate cancer metastases; (iii) all-cause death, occurring between randomization and 5-year follow-up. | at 5 years. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaelle GF FIARD, Professor | Contact | 0476767971 | +33 | gfiard@chu-grenoble.fr |
| Assilah AB bouzit | Contact | 0476767971 | +33 | abouzit@chu-grenoble.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| university Hospital Grenoble | Grenoble | Grenoble | 38043 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized, open-label, controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| To assess the impact of the new strategy on the number of prostate biopsies performed | Number of biopsy procedures performed. | at 2 years and 5 years. |
| To assess changes in therapeutic options with the new strategy | Choice of definitive treatment, if applicable, among the following options: (i) brachytherapy, (ii) focal therapy, and (iii) unimodal therapy. | at 2 years and 5 years. |
| To assess the oncologic safety with Adverse pathological criteria (pT3, pN1, detectable PSA)of the new strategy compared with the usual strategy | Adverse pathological criteria (pT3, pN1, detectable PSA) in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. | at 2 years and 5 years. |
| To assess the oncologic outcomes (Biochemical recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival.of the new strategy compared with the usual strategy | Biochemical recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival (i.e., censoring non-disease-related deaths), and overall survival. | at 2 years and 5 years. |
| To assess the impact of the new strategy on patients' anxiety levels and quality of life, evaluated at Day 0 and then annually for 5 years. | HADS scale, MAX-PC questionnaire, EPIC-26 questionnaire, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The combination of these questionnaires will allow us to assess the level of anxiety and the quality of life of patients treated with the new strategy; we have decided to use them together for a combined evaluation. | at 5 years |
| To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the new early-detection strategy compared with the standard of care from a societal perspective | ICUR. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) will be calculated by dividing the mean difference in costs by the mean difference in QALYs (estimated from the EQ-5D-5L). The ratio will be expressed as cost per healthy life-year gained. | at 5 years. |
| To establish an MRI database enabling comparison of radiomic characteristics between patients who have progressed and those who have not, in order to identify new imaging features associated with disease progression. | Database collecting all MRI examinations in DICOM format, along with oncologic outcomes (progression/no progression). | at 5 years |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |