Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
As the professional group that has the most frequent contact with patients, nurses are critical to the sustainability of safe care. Literature demonstrates that nursing practice is prone to error due to heavy workloads, time pressures, complex clinical tasks, inadequate rest, inappropriate working conditions, and the physiological strain of demanding shifts. When these conditions strain both physical and cognitive resources, the risk of errors during treatment administration increases.
Medical errors remain one of the most devastating realities of healthcare. Data from the World Health Organization reveals the significant morbidity and mortality caused by errors on a global scale. Numerous studies have demonstrated that student nurses have a significant rate of errors, and those with limited clinical experience are particularly at risk in fundamental areas such as medication administration, asepsis, and patient identification. Increasing patient numbers, short stays, rapid turnover, and the intense pace of clinics negatively impact student nurses' ability to provide safe care, prompting both educators and students to seek stronger pedagogical solutions.
This is where simulation-based training comes into play. Simulation is emerging as a contemporary teaching approach that enables students to develop their clinical skills, communication, decision-making, and self-efficacy in a risk-free, safe, and structured environment. It is increasingly being used because it supports knowledge and skill transfer, reduces fear and anxiety, strengthens self-confidence, and provides the opportunity to experience errors. In-situ simulation and standardized patient practice offer strong potential for reducing students' error proneness by providing an experience closest to real-world clinical situations. However, the lack of a study in the literature examining the effects of these two methods, particularly on the medical error proneness and attitudes of final-year nursing students, is a significant gap.
This study aims to strengthen a critical area of nursing education. The aim is to evaluate the impact of in-situ simulation and standardized patient practice on final-year nursing students' medical error proneness and attitudes toward medical errors and to reveal how they transform students' competencies in providing safe care.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Group 1 receives training in a simulation laboratory environment using standard patient interventions. |
|
| Group 2 | Experimental | Group 2 receives training in a real hospital setting through on-site simulations and standardized patient interventions. |
|
| Group 3 | No Intervention | Group 3 is the control group. They receive traditional classroom-based theoretical instruction. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized patient | Other | Group 1 receives training in a simulation laboratory environment using standard patient interventions. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Medical error tendency scale scores of final-year nursing students | Medical Error Tendency Scale The minimum possible score is 1, and the maximum is 5. While the scale does not have a cutoff point, an increase in the mean score indicates a low tendency for the nurse to make medical errors, while a decrease in the mean score indicates a high tendency to make errors. | From registration to week 8 of intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Medical error attitude scale scores of final year nursing students | Medical Error Attitude Scale The total scale score is calculated by dividing the total score by the number of items. The cutoff point is set at 3. Healthcare personnel scoring below 3 on the scale are considered incompetent. | From registration to week 8 of intervention |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: Students were included in the study if they were:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selçuk Görücü | Contact | +9005079554505 | selcukgorucu@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adnan Menderes University | Aydin | Turkey (Türkiye) |
This study does not plan to share raw data at the individual level. However, to promote transparency of research findings, summary data (demographic characteristics, pretest and posttest scores, group comparisons, and analysis results) that do not include participant identification will be shared with researchers upon request. No personal identifying information (name, contact information, institutional information, etc.) will be shared.
August 2026-December 2026
Access to data will be available only after a written request from the researcher and a review by the research team for scientific relevance. Access will only be provided by securely transmitting designated datasets via email; no sharing will be made via any open-access repository or online platform.
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | May 3, 2026 | |
| Reset | May 27, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2026 | May 27, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| İn-situ simulation | Other | Group 2 receives training in a real hospital setting through on-site simulations and standardized patient interventions. |
|