Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-A02189-40 | Other Identifier | ID-RCB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the representation of action peripersonal space (PPS) in subjects suffering from unilateral segmental exclusion syndrome of the upper limb compared to healthy control subjects. Segmental exclusion is defined by non-use or under-use of a limb segment without central nervous system damage. The study hypothesizes that this syndrome leads to a modification (shrinkage) of the PPS representation. Participants will perform reachability judgments in a Virtual Reality (VR) environment.
Segmental exclusion syndrome often occurs after limb trauma and manifests as a neglect-like behavior of peripheral origin, sometimes associated with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). The study explores whether the lack of limb use affects the representation of peripersonal space (PPS)-the space immediately surrounding the body where interactions with objects occur.
The study is monocentric, observational, with a matched control group. Participants will undergo:
Clinical assessment (questionnaires on pain, anxiety, body perception, and kinesiophobia).
A Virtual Reality (VR) test (approx. 40 minutes). In VR, participants will judge whether a cylinder presented at different distances and angles is reachable without moving (Perceived Reachable Distance - DMA-p). This will be compared to their Real Reachable Distance (DMA-r).
The goal is to measure the error of judgment to assess PPS representation and check for correlations with body schema disturbances or functional impairment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with Exclusion | Patients presenting with unilateral segmental exclusion of the upper limb or part of the hand evolving for more than 3 months. |
| |
| Healthy Controls | symptomatic volunteers with no history of upper limb impairment with sequelae. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reachability Judgment Task in VR. | Behavioral | Participants wear an Oculus Quest 2 VR headset. They first perform a motor task to measure Real Reachable Distance (DMA-r). Then, they perform a perceptual task where they must judge, without moving, if a virtual object is reachable (DMA-p). The test evaluates different spatial planes (front, 45° right, 45° left) and heights (shoulder, navel). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Judgment Error of Reachability | The Judgment Error of Reachability is a single composite metric calculated as: ((DMA-p - DMA-r) / DMA-r) × 100, expressed as a percentage (%). Both DMA-p (Perceived Maximum Reachable Distance) and DMA-r (Real Maximum Reachable Distance) are measured in centimeters, and their ratio yields a single dimensionless percentage score. | Day 1 (During the 40-minute VR assessment) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Body Perception Disturbance Score | Assessed using the Bath CRPS Body Perception Disturbance Scale (French version). Scores range from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating greater disturbance. | Day 1 (Before VR task) |
| Functional Impairment Score (400-Point Hand Assessment) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria (patients):
Inclusion Criteria (Controls):
Exclusion Criteria (All):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
he study population consists of two groups recruited at the Institut Régional de Réadaptation (Centre Louis Pierquin, UGECAM Nord-Est) in Nancy, France.
Patients with Exclusion: Participants are selected from patients receiving routine care (full hospitalization or day hospital) at the center. They are identified based on a functional assessment ("Bilan 400 points") showing specific impairments related to unilateral upper limb exclusion evolving for more than 3 months.
Healthy Controls: Asymptomatic volunteers are recruited through the social or family network of the investigators and current participants, as well as via posters displayed in the UGECAM centers.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Touillet, MD | Contact | +33 3 83 52 98 80 | amelie.touillet@ugecam.assurance-maladie.fr | |
| Jonahtan Pierret, PhD | Contact | +33 3 83 52 67 61 | jonathan.pierret@ugecam.assurance-maladie.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation (IRR), Centre Louis Pierquin. | Recruiting | Nancy | 54000 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020918 | Complex Regional Pain Syndromes |
| D010550 | Personal Space |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001342 | Autonomic Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Evaluated using the 400-Point Hand Assessment, which measures functional hand use. The score ranges from 0 to 400, where higher scores indicate better functional performance (better outcome). |
| Day 1 |
| Anxiety and Depression Score (HAD) | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Scores range from 0 to 21 for each dimension (Anxiety and Depression). | Day 1 |
| Kinesiophobia Score (Tampa Scale) | Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Assesses fear of movement. Scores range to 68; >40 indicates significant kinesiophobia. | Day 1 |
| Pain Catastrophizing Score (PCS) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Scores range from 0 to 52. | Day 1 |
| D013037 | Spatial Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |