Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the outcomes for patients managed with standard of care (SOC) wound treatments and those managed with standard of care treatment and tissue scaffolds, specifically Miro 3D. Tissue scaffolds like Miro 3D are 3-dimentional frameworks for collagen protein that provide structure and protection to help wounds heal.
Acellular tissue scaffolds, such as Miro3D, were developed to aid in the management of complex tissue defect wounds and ulcerations by providing a structural matrix that supports cellular infiltration and tissue regeneration. However, high-quality prospective data remain limited, particularly regarding soft tissue deficits and pressure ulcerations. This prospective RCT is designed to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of subjects randomized to receive either SOC alone or SOC with the addition of tissue scaffolding techniques (Miro3D) over a twelve (12)-week timeframe.
The trial will investigate two categories of complex wounds: soft tissue wounds, including post-fasciotomy wounds and wounds resulting from necrotizing skin and soft tissue infection (NSSTI), and chronic pressure ulcerations, with a focus on decubitus and ischial pressure ulcers. The trial aims to generate real-world data, including cost-effectiveness parameters, and features a crossover arm to evaluate the impact of delayed wound bed preparation and the application of tissue scaffolds.
Additionally, the trial will evaluate healing quality using digital wound photography and mathematical analysis of wound redness as a surrogate marker for granulation tissue formation. Time to hospital discharge will also be tracked for acute wounds to assess cost and resource utilization. By analyzing the effectiveness of Miro3D in combination with SOC, this trial seeks to provide meaningful insights into optimizing wound management strategies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex soft tissue wound arm | Active Comparator | The complex soft tissue wound arm will include consented subjects who have three-dimensional tissue defects, either elevated calf intra-compartmental hypertension treated with fasciotomy or serious infections of the foot or lower extremity that have been controlled with surgical debridement. Subjects will be randomized to either SOC alone or SOC plus Miro3D. |
|
| Chronic pressure ulceration arm | Active Comparator | The chronic pressure ulceration arm will include consented subjects with three-dimensional tissue deficits resulting from Stage III or greater pressure ulcerations, either a decubitus or ischial pressure ulcer that has been present and treated with SOC for at least four (4) weeks. Subjects will be randomized to SOC plus Miro3D or SOC alone. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care Treatment or Standard of Care Treatment plus Miro3D Wound Matrix | Other | Subjects with lower extremity three-dimensional tissue defects, including those resulting from elevated calf intra-compartmental hypertension treated with decompressive fasciotomies or serious NSSTIs of the foot or lower extremities (including the pelvis as part of the lower extremity). These defects must have been controlled with surgical debridement. Subjects will be randomized to either SOC alone or SOC plus the application of Miro3D tissue scaffolding. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of change defined as Percentage Area Reduction or PAR at four weeks after placement or not of the MIRO3D. | Rate of change | 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assess frequency of MIRO3D applications over a 12-week treatment period | Frequency of MIRO3D applications | 12 weeks |
| Assess cost of care, including operating room time and time to hospital discharge for acute wounds |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects must fulfill all the following inclusion criteria to qualify for enrollment:
Men or women 18-90 years of age at enrollment.
Ability to sign consent by subject or LAR.
Wounds in one of the two arms:
Subjects must agree to proper offloading and/or compression of the wound or ulcer throughout the trial.
Written informed consent is required for digital photo imaging.
For the Miro3D plus SOC arm, the wound or ulcer must have a clean base that is free of devitalized tissue or debris at the time of Miro3D placement.
Subjects receiving NPWT at baseline are eligible for enrollment. The use of NPWT during the trial will be at the discretion of the treating provider.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from trial participation:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Day, RN | Contact | (314) 747-4129 | aaronday@wustl.edu | |
| Stacey Reese, RN, BSN | Contact | (443) 865-3970 | staceyreese@wustl.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| John Kirby, MD | Washington University School of Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington University School of Medicine | Recruiting | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32813669 | Background | Fridman R, Rafat P, Van Gils CC, Horn D, Vayser D, Lambert JC Jr. Treatment of Hard-to-heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers With a Hepatic-derived Wound Matrix. Wounds. 2020 Sep;32(9):244-252. Epub 2020 Jun 21. | |
| 25942412 | Background | Doupis J, Veves A. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wounds. 2008 May;20(5):117-26. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive one of the 2 study treatments: either standard of care alone or standard of care treatment with Miro 3D. Efficacy will be determined by quantifying wound closure and PAR toward closure. The trial will also examine cost of care, number of serial placements of Miro3D, and time to hospital discharge for acute wounds.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Standard of Care Treatment or Standard of Care Treatment plus Miro3D Wound Matrix | Other | Subjects with complex pressure ulcerations, particularly decubitus or ischial pressure ulcerations (Stage III or greater). These subjects will be randomized to either SOC alone or SOC plus Miro3D tissue scaffolding. |
|
Cost of care (dollars as units of cost)
| 12 weeks |
| Assess NPWT use | Frequency of NPWT use | 12 weeks |
| Assess cellular findings from tissue sampling | Prescence of bacteria or fungus, blood vessels and new healing cells on pathology | 12 weeks |
| Assess antibiotic use | Frequency of antibiotic use | 12 weeks |
| Assess pain | Subject-reported pain scores using Likert Scale, 0=No Pain - 10=Worst Possible Pain | 12 weeks |
| Assess subject-reported ability to move to self-care | Patients will report if they are able to change their dressing on their own without anyone's assistance versus others having to assist (including if home health was able to be stopped) and when this occurred in their treatment course. | 12 weeks |
| Background | International best practice guidelines: wound management in diabetic foot ulcers. Wounds Int. May 10, 2013. www.woundsinternational.com/resources/details/best-practice-guidelines-wound-management-diabetic-foot-ulcers |
| 15644549 | Background | Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):217-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.217. |
| 27061677 | Background | NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1513-1530. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8. Epub 2016 Apr 6. |
| 37278612 | Background | Cao X, Lin X, Li N, Zhao X, Zhou M, Zhao Y. Animal tissue-derived biomaterials for promoting wound healing. Mater Horiz. 2023 Aug 29;10(9):3237-3256. doi: 10.1039/d3mh00411b. |
| 27898014 | Background | Chaudhari AA, Vig K, Baganizi DR, Sahu R, Dixit S, Dennis V, Singh SR, Pillai SR. Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Nov 25;17(12):1974. doi: 10.3390/ijms17121974. |
| 34715138 | Background | Sharma S, Rai VK, Narang RK, Markandeywar TS. Collagen-based formulations for wound healing: A literature review. Life Sci. 2022 Feb 1;290:120096. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.120096. Epub 2021 Oct 26. |
| 31854227 | Background | Ansari T, Southgate A, Obiri-Yeboa I, Jones LG, Greco K, Olayanju A, Mbundi L, Somasundaram M, Davidson B, Sibbons PD. Development and Characterization of a Porcine Liver Scaffold. Stem Cells Dev. 2020 Mar 1;29(5):314-326. doi: 10.1089/scd.2019.0069. Epub 2020 Feb 11. |
| 36807830 | Background | Bertsch C, Marechal H, Gribova V, Levy B, Debry C, Lavalle P, Fath L. Biomimetic Bilayered Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: From Current Design Strategies to Medical Applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023 Jul;12(17):e2203115. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202203115. Epub 2023 Mar 8. |