Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) dermal implant for the correction of nasolabial folds. The study also aims to determine whether the investigational product (FUYANMEI Poly-L-Lactic Acid) is non-inferior to the control product (Sculptra).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare the investigational PLLA implant to an approved PLLA implant using a prospective, randomized, evaluator- and subject-blinded, single-center, split-face controlled study design. Approximately 121 eligible participants will be enrolled.
Participants will:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| FUYANMEI Poly-L-Lactic Acid | Experimental | Poly-L-Lactic Acid |
|
| Sculptra® | Active Comparator | Poly-L-Lactic Acid |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUYANMEI Poly-L-Lactic Acid | Device | Poly-L-Lactic Acid |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The responder rate based on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS). | The WSRS responder rate at Month 6 post-injection was compared between the treatment and control groups. A WSRS responder was defined as a participant who achieved an improvement of at least 1 point in the WSRS score compared with baseline. | at Month 6 post-injection |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) scores | WSRS was assessed using a 5-point scale (1-5), with higher scores indicating greater wrinkle severity. Blinded evaluators assessed WSRS scores at baseline, immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 following injection. | at baseline, immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lai-San Wong, M.D. | Contact | +886-7-7317123 | 2424 | laisan7@hotmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Kaohsiung City | 833401 | Taiwan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sculptra® |
| Device |
Poly-L-Lactic Acid |
|
| WSRS responder rates | WSRS responder rates assessed by blinded evaluators at baseline, Day 0, and Months 1, 3, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection. A WSRS responder was defined as a participant who achieved an improvement of at least 1 point in the WSRS score compared with baseline. | at baseline, Day 0, and Months 1, 3, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection |
| Change in nasolabial fold volume | Images were captured using a VECTRA H2 3D camera (Canfield Scientific) at a fixed distance from the subject's face under standardized lighting and background conditions. The resulting image files were analyzed for volumetric measurements using 3D imaging software. Changes in nasolabial fold volume from baseline (Day 0) were assessed at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 using the three-dimensional imaging system. | at baseline, Day 0, and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores | GAIS scores were measured using a 5-point scale (1-5), with lower scores indicating poorer improvement. Blinded evaluators assessed GAIS scores immediately post-treatment (Day 0) and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 after injection. | at immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection |
| Subject-reported GAIS scores | Subject-reported GAIS scores at immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection. | at immediately post-treatment (Day 0), and Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection |
| Subject-reported satisfaction scores | Subject-reported satisfaction was assessed at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection. Participants rated their satisfaction with the treatment's safety and effectiveness using a questionnaire scored on a 5-point scale (1-5), where 5 indicated very high satisfaction and 1 indicated very low satisfaction. | at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection |
| Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) | The incidence rate of adverse events (AEs), expressed as a percentage, will be calculated based on subjects who reported AEs or whose AEs were observed by investigators. The incidence rate will be determined using the following formula: AE (%) = (number of subjects who experienced AEs in each group ÷ total number of subjects in each group) × 100. Adverse events will be assessed on the day of treatment and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-treatment. | at Day 0, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection |
| Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | The incidence rate of serious adverse events (SAEs), expressed as a percentage, will be calculated based on subjects who reported SAEs or whose SAEs were observed by investigators. The incidence rate will be determined using the following formula: SAE (%) = (number of subjects who experienced SAEs in each group ÷ total number of subjects in each group) × 100. Adverse events will be assessed on the day of treatment and at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-treatment. | at Day 0, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 post-injection |