Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, a universal adhesive was used with different adhesive techniques (self-etch and total-etch modes) and evaluated for 18 months in three different types of composite material class III and class IV restorations according to the FDI criteria. The hypotheses tested in this study are: (1) clinical success will not differ between different composite materials and (2) clinical outcomes will not differ between different application modes of the universal adhesive.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composite materials | Other | Restorations |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| FDI criteria | very good, good, poor, very poor | 2 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All restorations to be evaluated in this study were performed at the Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University. Participants who received routine dental treatment at the university's dental clinic and whose records were kept will be included in the research.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muhammet Karadaş | Recruiting | Merkez | Rize Province | 53100 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided