Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess if circulating tumor DNA can guide adjuvant selection in high-intermediate risk early-stage endometrial cancer. The main question it aims to answer is:
• To evaluate if 3-year recurrence-free survival among women with Stage I, high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer who are ctDNA negative after receiving ctDNA-guided observation is non-inferior to adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (an internal radiation therapy) Researchers will compare high-risk intermediate ctDNA negative participants who are observed to those who receive vaginal brachytherapy to see if they have similar outcomes.
Participants will be asked to:
This includes a randomized, multi-center, non-inferiority trial for a biomarker-defined subgroup, alongside two parallel, non-randomized exploratory cohorts. The study utilizes a biomarker-stratified design to formally test a treatment de-escalation strategy in patients with HIR endometrial cancer.
Following surgery, patients in the HIR cohort will be stratified based on post-operative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status, as determined by the Signatera Genome assay. ctDNA-negative HIR Patients, based on the first valid post-operative ctDNA result within the baseline window, will be randomized (1:1) to either:
Following the initial baseline test, providers will be blinded to subsequent ctDNA results unless ctDNA positive within the first 12 weeks in Arm A [in which case, the provider will be notified and treatment of physician's choice (TPC) will be initiated. Initiation of TPC following ctDNA conversion is considered part of the ctDNA-guided treatment strategy, not a protocol deviation or cross-over, and such patients remain in the intent-to-treat population in Arm A]. Providers treating patients in Arm B will remain blinded to all ctDNA results after randomization. Post-operative ctDNA-Positive HIR patients will not be randomized and will continue serial testing while receiving TPC, which may include observation, radiation and/or chemotherapy. Providers and patients will be unblinded to the initial ctDNA result and blinded to ctDNA results thereafter.
The study will also include early stage low-risk (LR) and high-risk (HR) cohorts. Patients in these cohorts will not be randomized. They will continue serial ctDNA testing while receiving TPC, which may include observation, radiation and/or chemotherapy, and during surveillance. Providers and patients will be blinded to ctDNA results during the post-operative, TPC and surveillance period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | Other | Participants will be monitored by their study physician and will not receive treatment |
|
| Vaginal Brachytherapy (VBT) | Active Comparator | Participants will receive standard-of-care vaginal brachytherapy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Signatera Genome ultra-sensitive ctDNA blood test | Device | Signatera Genome is intended for use as a post-surgical risk stratification tool for patients with early-stage HIR endometrial cancer. The test is used to identify patients with no evidence of MRD following definitive surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) | The primary objective of this study is to evaluate if recurrence free survival (RFS) is non-inferior among women with stage I high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer who are ctDNA-negative after surgery and managed with ctDNA-guided observation versus adjuvant VBT. | 3 years from randomization to the first occurrence of disease recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurs first |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survial | Comparison of overall survival (OS) among all high-intermediate risk (HIR) patients and recurrence free survival (RFS) across treatment groups and assess whether ctDNA-guided de-escalation group is non-inferior to adjuvant VBT. | From enrollment to Year 3 and enrollment to Year 5 |
| ctDNA Clearance Rate |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lead time of ctDNA positivity | Examine differences in lead time of ctDNA positivity relative to clinical or radiologic diagnosis of recurrence across different ctDNA dynamic groups (e.g. clearance, persistent negative) among LR, HIR, and HR patients. | Up to 5 years from enrollment |
| Disease-specific recurrence |
Inclusion Criteria:
General inclusion criteria includes the following selection criteria to be eligible for inclusion in any aspect of the study. Eligibility will be assessed by the investigator:
1. Signed and dated informed consent form (ICF) obtained prior to any trial-specific enrollment procedure.
2. Patient is ≥ 18 years-old at the time of ICF signature. 3. Able to submit sufficient residual tissue obtained per standard of care procedures.
HIR patients must meet all the following selection criteria to be eligible for the randomization cohort in the study. Eligibility will be assessed by the investigator:
FIGO 2009 Stage I after hysterectomy and lymph node assessment by bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy or SLND
Stage I patients with endometrioid histology:
Uterine risk factors include:
Patients must meet all the following selection criteria to be eligible for the observation arms of the study. Eligibility will be assessed by the investigator following hysterectomy and lymph node assessment by bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy or SLND:
1. High risk cohort
a. FIGO 2009 Stage I with high risk histology i. Defined as serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, or mixed histology.
2. Low risk cohort
a. FIGO 2009 Stage I patients at low risk of recurrence i. Endometriod histology ii. Absent uterine risk factors, or present but insufficient to meet HIR criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients are not eligible for the study if they meet any of the following criteria, as assessed by the investigator:
Undifferentiated or dedifferentiated histology
Uterine sarcoma
Prior pelvic radiation therapy
Positive pelvic washings
Pelvic lymph node assessment was not performed
Isolated Tumor Cells (ITC) identified in the lymph node(s)
Prior therapy for endometrial cancer (including hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy)
a. Contraceptives or other hormonal management for endometrial intraepithelial hyperplasia is allowed
Patients with a history of other invasive malignancies, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer, are excluded if there is any evidence of active malignancy within the last five years.
a. Patients are also excluded if their previous cancer treatment contraindicates this protocol therapy.
Patients with a history of serious comorbid illness or uncontrolled illnesses that would preclude protocol therapy.
Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or uncontrolled arrhythmia within 3 months from enrollment.
Previous diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.
Patient is currently receiving, or plans to receive, commercial ctDNA/MRD assay for disease monitoring, excluding Signatera. Patients must agree to forego testing with assays other than Signatera Genome upon enrollment until end of study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brooke Cormane, MBS | Contact | 844-778-4700 | bcormane@natera.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adam ElNaggar, MD | Natera, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital | Birmingham | Alabama | 35294 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27-38 | ||
| 25641568 | Background | Mahdi H, Elshaikh MA, DeBenardo R, Munkarah A, Isrow D, Singh S, Waggoner S, Ali-Fehmi R, Morris RT, Harding J, Moslemi-Kebria M. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and pelvic radiation on pattern of recurrence and outcome in stage I non-invasive uterine papillary serous carcinoma. A multi-institution study. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.544. Epub 2015 Jan 29. | |
| 15051771 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Following the initial baseline test, providers in Arm A will be blinded to all subsequent ctDNA results unless ctDNA positive within the first 12 weeks in Arm A (in which case, the provider will be notified and TPC will be initiated).
Providers treating participants in Arm B will remain blinded to all ctDNA results following the initial baseline test. Providers and patients enrolled in the early stage low-risk and high-risk cohorts will be blinded to all ctDNA results (post-operatively, during treatment, and during surveillance).
|
Estimate the ctDNA clearance rate among high-intermediate risk ctDNA positive participants. |
| From enrollment until first surveillance visit at 12 weeks |
| Clinicopathologic and Molecular Risk Factors | Assess the primary and secondary objectives by clinicopathologic and molecular (e.g. POLE, MMR-D, p53 aberrant, p53 wild type) risk factors, and ethnic/racial groups among high-intermediate risk patients. | Up to 5 years from enrollment |
Determine disease-specific recurrence among high-intermediate risk patients. |
| At 3 years and 5 years. |
| ctDNA positivity rate | Assess ctDNA positivity rate, defined as proportion of patients, among all HIR, HR, and LR patients with evaluable ctDNA results | From randomization to 3 years and 5 years |
| ctDNA negativity rate | ctDNA negativity rate, defined as proportion of patients with a negative ctDNA, among all HIR, HR, and LR patients with evaluable ctDNA results. | From randomization to 3 years and 5 years |
| ctDNA clearance rate | Assess the ctDNA clearance rate of ctDNA from HIR, HR, and LR participants. | From enrollment up to 5 years |
| ctDNA negative persistence rate | Assess proportion of HIR, HR, and LR participants who remain ctDNA-negative throughout the surveillance period among participants who were ctDNA-negative post-operatively or post-adjuvant treatment. | From enrollment to end of treatment and up to 5 years. |
| Mean Tumor Molecules (MTM) | Assess mean tumor molecules (MTM) presence change over time in HIR, HR, and LR participants. | From enrollment to up to 5 years |
| Variant Allele Frequencies (VAF) | Assess variant allele frequencies (VAF) changes over time in HIR, HR, and LR participants. | From enrollment up to 5 years |
| Cost-effectiveness of ctDNA guided care | Compare the ctDNA cost for High-Risk Intermediate endometrial cancer participants who were randomized to the observation cohort to those that received standard of care (VBT) treatment | Up to 5 years from enrollment |
| Quality of Life Outcomes | Compare Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes between the Observation and Vaginal Brachytherapy (VBT) treatment arms among HIR patients, utilizing the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms Version 4 (FACT-ES) patient-reported outcome (PRO). | Up to 5 years from enrollment |
| University of California, San Diego | La Jolla | California | 92093 | United States |
|
| University of California, Los Angeles | Los Angeles | California | 90095 | United States |
|
| University of Miami | Miami | Florida | 33146 | United States |
|
| University of Chicago | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
|
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
|
| New York University | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
|
| Atrium Health Levine Cancer | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28204 | United States |
|
| Duke University | Durham | North Carolina | 27708 | United States |
|
| Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
|
| Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
|
| Allegheny Health | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15224 | United States |
| Background |
| Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, van den Bergh AC, de Winter KA, Koper PC, Lybeert ML, Slot A, Lutgens LC, Stenfert Kroese MC, Beerman H, van Lent M; postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma Trial. Outcome of high-risk stage IC, grade 3, compared with stage I endometrial carcinoma patients: the Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Apr 1;22(7):1234-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.159. |
| 16495918 | Background | Hamilton CA, Cheung MK, Osann K, Chen L, Teng NN, Longacre TA, Powell MA, Hendrickson MR, Kapp DS, Chan JK. Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. Br J Cancer. 2006 Mar 13;94(5):642-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603012. |
| 35277281 | Background | Siegenthaler F, Lindemann K, Epstein E, Rau TT, Nastic D, Ghaderi M, Rydberg F, Mueller MD, Carlson J, Imboden S. Time to first recurrence, pattern of recurrence, and survival after recurrence in endometrial cancer according to the molecular classification. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):230-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.024. Epub 2022 Mar 8. |
| 33536036 | Background | Feng W, Jia N, Jiao H, Chen J, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhu M, Zhu C, Shen L, Long W. Circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic marker in high-risk endometrial cancer. J Transl Med. 2021 Feb 3;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02722-8. |
| 34887451 | Background | Makker V, MacKay H, Ray-Coquard I, Levine DA, Westin SN, Aoki D, Oaknin A. Endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Dec 9;7(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00324-8. |
| 36139659 | Background | Kalampokas E, Giannis G, Kalampokas T, Papathanasiou AA, Mitsopoulou D, Tsironi E, Triantafyllidou O, Gurumurthy M, Parkin DE, Cairns M, Vlahos NF. Current Approaches to the Management of Patients with Endometrial Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 16;14(18):4500. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184500. |
| 31116674 | Background | Clarke MA, Devesa SS, Harvey SV, Wentzensen N. Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Incidence Trends and Differences in Relative Survival Reveal Racial Disparities and Rising Rates of Nonendometrioid Cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1895-1908. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00151. Epub 2019 May 22. |
| 35115431 | Background | Giaquinto AN, Broaddus RR, Jemal A, Siegel RL. The Changing Landscape of Gynecologic Cancer Mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar 1;139(3):440-442. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004676. |
| Background | https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2018/ |
| 17145260 | Background | Sohaib SA, Houghton SL, Meroni R, Rockall AG, Blake P, Reznek RH. Recurrent endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrent disease and assessment of prognosis. Clin Radiol. 2007 Jan;62(1):28-34; discussion 35-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.06.015. |
| Background | Howlader N, N.A., Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds), SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2017. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD |
| 39817679 | Background | Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Jan-Feb;75(1):10-45. doi: 10.3322/caac.21871. Epub 2025 Jan 16. |
| 35256416 | Background | van den Heerik ASVM, Horeweg N, Creutzberg CL, Nout RA. Vaginal brachytherapy management of stage I and II endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Mar;32(3):304-310. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002493. |
| 35038071 | Background | Kako TD, Kamal MZ, Dholakia J, Scalise CB, Arend RC. High-intermediate risk endometrial cancer: moving toward a molecularly based risk assessment profile. Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;27(2):323-331. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02089-2. Epub 2022 Jan 17. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016889 | Endometrial Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014594 | Uterine Neoplasms |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided