Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aimed to compare the effects of single-set versus multiple-set resistance training on neuromuscular performance and muscle morphology in sedentary men. Participants were randomly assigned to a single-set training group, a multiple-set training group, or a non-training control group. The intervention consisted of a structured resistance training program performed over a defined training period, while the control group maintained their usual lifestyle without structured exercise. Neuromuscular performance outcomes included maximal strength and functional performance measures, and muscle morphology was assessed using appropriate imaging and anthropometric methods. The findings of this study are intended to contribute to the understanding of optimal resistance training volume for improving neuromuscular adaptations in previously untrained individuals.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate the effects of resistance training volume on neuromuscular performance and muscle morphology in sedentary adult men. Participants with no regular resistance training history were recruited and randomly allocated into three groups: a single-set resistance training group, a multiple-set resistance training group, and a non-training control group.
Both training groups participated in a supervised resistance training program targeting major muscle groups. The single-set group performed one set per exercise, while the multiple-set group performed multiple sets per exercise, using comparable exercise selection, intensity progression, and rest intervals. Training sessions were conducted at a consistent weekly frequency over the intervention period. The control group did not engage in any structured exercise program and was instructed to maintain their habitual daily activities throughout the study.
Neuromuscular performance was evaluated using maximal strength and functional performance assessments conducted before and after the intervention period. Muscle morphology outcomes were assessed using standardized measurement techniques appropriate for evaluating changes in muscle size and structure. All assessments were performed by trained personnel following standardized protocols.
The primary objective of the study was to compare the magnitude of neuromuscular and morphological adaptations between single-set and multiple-set resistance training protocols in previously untrained individuals. Secondary objectives included comparing both training interventions with a non-training control condition. The results of this study aim to provide evidence-based insight into the effectiveness of different resistance training volumes for improving neuromuscular adaptations in sedentary populations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-Set Resistance Training | Experimental | Participants performed a supervised resistance training program consisting of one set per exercise. Training was conducted at moderate intensity using standard resistance exercises targeting major muscle groups. |
|
| Multiple-Set Resistance Training | Experimental | Participants performed a supervised resistance training program consisting of multiple sets per exercise. Exercise selection, intensity, and training frequency were comparable to the single-set group. |
|
| Control Group | No Intervention | Participants did not participate in any structured exercise training program and were instructed to maintain their usual daily activities throughout the study period. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance Training | Behavioral | A structured and supervised resistance training program performed at moderate intensity using free weights and resistance machines. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal Muscle Strength (1RM) | Change in maximal muscle strength assessed by one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing for major upper- and lower-body exercises. | Baseline and Week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Muscle morphology | Changes in muscle morphology assessed using fat-free mass, body fat percentage, and limb circumference measurements. | Baseline and Week 8 |
| Vertical Jump Height | Change in vertical jump height assessed using a standardized countermovement jump test to evaluate lower-body explosive power. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inonu University, Faculty of Sport Sciences | Malatya | 44280 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057185 | Sedentary Behavior |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055070 | Resistance Training |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005081 | Exercise Therapy |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were randomly assigned to one of three parallel groups: single-set resistance training, multiple-set resistance training, or a non-exercising control group. All groups were followed concurrently throughout the intervention period.
Not provided
Not provided
This study was conducted as an open-label trial. Due to the nature of the exercise interventions, neither participants nor investigators were blinded to group allocation.
Not provided
| Baseline and Week 8 |
| 20-m Sprint Time | Change in 20-meter sprint time assessed using electronic timing gates to evaluate short-distance sprint performance. | Baseline and Week 8 |
| Handgrip Strength | Change in maximal handgrip strength assessed using a calibrated handgrip dynamometer to evaluate upper-body isometric strength. | Baseline and Week 8 |
| Estimated VO₂max | Change in estimated maximal oxygen uptake derived from performance in the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1. | Baseline and Week 8 |
| Perceived Exertion (OMNI-RES) | Change in perceived exertion assessed using the OMNI-Resistance Exercise Scale during resistance training sessions. | Baseline and Week 8 |
| D005791 |
| Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D064797 | Physical Conditioning, Human |
| D015444 | Exercise |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
| D009142 | Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |