Children often experience fear, anxiety, and pain during wound care procedures, which can make treatment more difficult and distressing. Non-pharmacological distraction techniques may help reduce these negative experiences without the use of medications. Virtual reality (VR) provides immersive visual and auditory stimulation, while simple distraction tools such as game cards offer a low-cost alternative.

This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality glasses and distraction game cards in reducing fear, anxiety, pain, and physiological stress responses in children aged 5 to 10 years undergoing open wound care. Ninety children are randomly assigned to one of three groups: standard care alone, standard care with distraction game cards, or standard care with virtual reality glasses. Psychological outcomes (fear, anxiety, and pain) and physiological indicators (heart rate and oxygen saturation) are measured before and after the wound care procedure. The results of this study will help identify effective, non-pharmacological strategies to improve children's experiences during painful medical procedures and support child-centered care in pediatric clinical settings.

Open wound care procedures are common in pediatric emergency settings and are frequently associated with fear, anxiety, pain, and physiological stress in children. These responses may interfere with cooperation during treatment and negatively affect children's short- and long-term perceptions of healthcare. Although pharmacological approaches can reduce pain, non-pharmacological interventions are increasingly recommended as complementary strategies to minimize distress without additional medical risk.

Distraction techniques represent one of the most widely used non-pharmacological approaches in pediatric care. Immersive virtual reality (VR) has gained attention as a promising distraction method due to its ability to provide multisensory engagement and strong attentional capture. By immersing children in an interactive virtual environment, VR may reduce awareness of painful stimuli and procedural threat. In contrast, distraction game cards offer a simple, low-cost alternative that engages children cognitively through visual search and pattern recognition tasks. Despite growing evidence supporting both approaches, direct comparisons between immersive VR and low-cost distraction methods during pediatric wound care remain limited.

This study is designed as a single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial conducted in the pediatric emergency department of Agri Training and Research Hospital in Turkey. Children aged 5-10 years who require open wound care, including cleansing, dressing, or suturing, are eligible to participate. Following informed consent from parents or guardians and assent from children, participants are randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: standard wound care alone (control group), standard care with distraction game cards, or standard care with immersive virtual reality glasses.

All participants receive wound care according to institutional clinical protocols. Children in the virtual reality group wear VR glasses displaying age-appropriate immersive content throughout the procedure. Children in the game card group engage with illustrated distraction cards facilitated by a trained researcher. Psychological outcomes, including fear, state anxiety, and pain, are assessed immediately before and shortly after the procedure using validated child-appropriate scales. Physiological responses, including heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation, are measured concurrently using a pulse oximeter.

The primary objective of the study is to compare post-procedural fear, anxiety, and pain levels between groups. Secondary objectives include evaluation of within-group changes and comparison of physiological stress indicators across interventions. By directly comparing immersive virtual reality with a simple, low-cost distraction method, this study aims to provide clinically relevant evidence to inform the selection of effective, feasible, and scalable non-pharmacological interventions for pediatric wound care.

Inclusion Criteria:Children aged 5 to 10 years.

Presentation with an open wound requiring wound care procedures such as cleansing, dressing, debridement, and/or suturing.

Hemodynamic stability at baseline (peripheral oxygen saturation ≥95% and heart rate within age-appropriate limits).

Ability to communicate sufficiently to complete study assessments.

Provision of written informed consent by a parent or legal guardian.

Provision of verbal assent by the child. -

Exclusion Criteria:Presence of neurodevelopmental disorders or communication impairments that could interfere with study assessments.

Significant visual or hearing impairment.

Head or facial wounds that prevent the use of virtual reality glasses.

History of motion sickness or previous adverse reactions to virtual reality.

Receipt of sedatives or systemic opioid analgesics within 6 hours prior to the procedure.

Requirement for procedural sedation during wound care.

Any clinical condition deemed by the attending physician to make participation inappropriate.

-

Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves a pediatric population and was conducted at a single center with a relatively small sample size, which increases the risk of participant re-identification. In addition, the informed consent obtained from parents or guardians did not include permission for data sharing beyond the research team. De-identified aggregate data are reported in the published results.

Due to the nature of the distraction interventions, participants and care providers were not blinded. Outcome assessment and data entry were performed by a research assistant who was blinded to group allocation.