Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
PrEP4U is designed as a pragmatic, randomized implementation trial to test strategies that could directly inform real-world roll-out of lenacapavir. By integrating:
The primary hypothesis is that giving participants choice in follow-up location will improve PrEP persistence compared to a clinic-only model. Secondary analyses will evaluate safety of rapid testing, acceptability, and participant costs. Exploratory analyses will assess HIV incidence and resistance.
Findings from PrEP4U will provide essential evidence to guide scalable, equitable, person-centered delivery models for lenacapavir PrEP in the U.S. and globally.
Since the introduction of oral PrEP over a decade ago, more than 1.3 million HIV infections occur globally each year, far exceeding the UNAIDS 2030 target of < 335,000 cases. UNAIDS estimated that only 2.3 million people used PrEP in 2023, far below the target of 10 million by 2025. Oral PrEP persistence remains low, with many individuals discontinuing within 6-12 months. Factors contributing to low uptake and persistence include pill fatigue, stigma, access barriers, and medical mistrust. The gap is especially stark in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, where PrEP coverage lags behind epidemic burden.
The United States mirrors this global picture; despite broad access to healthcare, disparities in uptake and continuation persist along racial, ethnic, and gender lines. According to the CDC, in 2022 only 36% of individuals eligible for PrEP were prescribed it. Marked disparities exist: Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals and women represent a disproportionate share of new HIV diagnoses but a much smaller fraction of PrEP users. In Massachusetts, for example, Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals accounted for 35% and 31% of new HIV cases in 2022, yet only 7% and 12% of PrEP users in 2023, respectively. These disparities highlight ongoing barriers to access, stigma, and persistence.
Lenacapavir is a first-in-class HIV-1 capsid inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action and an exceptionally long half-life, enabling subcutaneous administration every 26 weeks. PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2, large multicenter randomized clinical trials, established lenacapavir's efficacy for HIV prevention. In PURPOSE 2, a Phase 3 randomized trial of over 3,000 participants at risk for HIV infection, HIV incidence with lenacapavir was 0.10 per 100 person-years, compared to 0.93 per 100 person-years in the oral F/TDF arm and 2.37 per 100 person-years in the background incidence cohort. Lenacapavir reduced HIV incidence by 96% compared with background incidence and by 89% compared with oral PrEP. No major safety concerns were identified, though 1.2% discontinued due to injection-site reactions. These findings, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2025, demonstrated that twice-yearly lenacapavir is a highly effective PrEP agent.
Lenacapavir addresses key limitations of oral PrEP:
Thus, lenacapavir has the potential to transform HIV prevention - if delivery strategies are optimized.
While clinical trials demonstrate efficacy, implementation science questions remain:
Suffolk County, Massachusetts - home to central Boston - is designated a high-burden HIV area in the U.S. "Ending the HIV Epidemic" initiative, reporting 118 new HIV diagnoses in 2022. Despite broad health insurance coverage and a state-sponsored PrEP assistance program, PrEP uptake and persistence remain insufficient among Black, Hispanic/Latino, and female populations. PrEP4U will specifically recruit participants from these priority populations through community partner organizations, mobile van services, and clinical sites. The trial is designed to address equity gaps by testing models of care that reduce stigma, bring services closer to people, and incorporate patient choice.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PrEP Clinic | Active Comparator | The PrEP Clinic arm will be randomized to receive follow up at the clinic |
|
| PrEP Choice | Experimental | The PrEP Choice arm allows participants to choose where they receive their follow up |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Choice of follow up | Other | Randomization to either standard clinic follow up or choice of where follow up takes place |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PrEP persistence at 6 months | Proportion of participants in the PrEP Choice arm versus the PrEP Clinic arm who successfully receive the second on-time injection | 26 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety of same-day initiation based on rapid HIV testing | Proportion of individuals in whom rapid and laboratory Ag/Ab test results are consistent. | 26 weeks |
| Acceptability of same-day initiation and follow-up models |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Incidence by Study Arm | HIV incidence rate (per 100 person-years) by arm | 26 weeks |
| Lenacapavir Resistance in HIV Seroconverters | Proportion of HIV infections with confirmed resistance mutations |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meighan Krows | Contact | 617-726-2000 | mkrows@mgb.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ruanne V Barnabas, MBChB, PhD | Massachusetts General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Health Clinic | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
Interested parties may contact the central contact with requests for data. Data sets will be provided based on approval of request/concept by protocol team.
Once analysis of the study objectives is complete. Tentatively January 2027
The protocol team will review all data requests. Upon approval of requests the data analyst will work with the requester to provide the data in an acceptable format, using a secure access link.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Follow up via standard clinic | Other | Follow up will take place at the clinic where the first dose was administered. |
|
Participant acceptability scores measured using structured surveys
| 26 weeks |
| Participant costs associated with PrEP delivery models | Average participant costs (financial and time) per injection visit in clinic versus community/home settings | 26 weeks |
| 26 weeks |
| Subgroup Analyses of Persistence | Identification of populations for whom differentiated delivery has the greatest impact | 26 weeks |