Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Mansoura University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of crestal sinus lifting using densah burs versus lateral window technique in vertically deficient posterior maxilla with simultaneous implant placement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| crestal technique using densah burs | Experimental | Seven implant sites underwent sinus membrane elevation procedure using densah burs with crestal approach. Crestal flap was made and Densah bur with diameter 2.00 mm will be used in osseodensification mode with copious irrigation till sinus floor, then diameter 3.00 mm bur up to 3 mm past the sinus floor, then sequential wider burs to reach the final desired width followed by bone grafting and simultaneous implant placement. |
|
| lateral window technique | Active Comparator | Seven implant sites underwent sinus membrane elevation procedure using lateral window technique. Pyramidal flap was made and an trap door is created in the lateral sinus wall to gain access to Schneiderian membrane in order to elevate it and provide space for the bone graft material to be placed followed by simultaneous implant placement. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| crestal sinus lifting using densah burs | Procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| change from baseline in pain, as measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) | Pain was evaluated postoperatively at the day of surgery, 3rd and 7th day post-surgically Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a simple, widely used tool, typically an 11-point scale (0-10), where patients rate their pain intensity, with 0 meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "worst imaginable pain,". | Baseline, 7 days |
| change from baseline of edema | Edema was evaluated with the aid of tape measure (in centimeters). Three measurements were performed on the patient's operated site preoperatively, 3rd and 7th day after surgery. The evaluation of edema was done by subtracting the total value of the three measurements obtained postoperatively (at 3rd and 7th day) from the total value of the three measurements obtained at pre-operative baseline. The three measuring lines are:
| baseline, 7 days |
| change of implant stability, as measured by osstell | Stability was measured with osstell (ISQ) immediately after implant placement (T0) after 12 months (T12). ISQ is a scale that ranges from 1 to 100 and is used to assess implant stability. Scales greater than 70 ISQ indicate a high level of stability, scales between 60 and 69 means medium stability and scales >60 ISQ are considered as low stability. | baseline, 12 months |
| change from baseline in Grafted sinus height (GSH) | CBCT was made preoperatively, immediately after sinus augmentation (T0) and 6 months after loading (T12) for evaluation of Grafted sinus height (GSH): the distance between the original sinus floor to the new sinus floor regarding crestal cortical line. | baseline, 12 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patient medically free from systemic, immunologic or debilitating diseases or local conditions that could affect normal bone healing and/or implant placement.
2. Patient with good oral hygiene. 3. Age from 18 to 55 years. 4. Partially edentulous patients with missed one or more of maxillary posterior teeth with residual alveolar ridge height 3-5 mm and a minimal width of the alveolar ridge 7 mm in the region of the planned implant site.
5. Patients' edentulous ridges covered with optimal width of keratinized mucosa (<3 mm) with no signs of inflammation, ulceration of scar tissue.
6. No history of parafunctional habits. 7. Patients were ready to comply with the follow-up and maintenance program. 8. Sufficient inter arch space for prothesis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. Patients with clinical or radiographic evidence of rhinosinusitis or any other pathology in the maxillary sinus.
2. Smokers. 3. Pregnancy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wael Mohamed Ahmed, professor | department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, faculty of dentistry, mansoura university | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University | Al Mansurah | Dakahlia Governorate | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The patients were divided randomly into two equal groups; each included 7 implants:
- For group I: Sinus membrane elevation procedure using densah burs with crestal approach followed by bone grafting and simultaneous implant placement were done in this group.
- For group II: Sinus membrane elevation procedure using lateral window technique followed by bone grafting and simultaneous implant placement were done in this group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| sinus lifting using lateral window technique | Procedure |
|
|
|