Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
"Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models and conversational tools, is increasingly being used in medical research. These tools may assist researchers at different stages of the scientific process, such as generating research ideas, reviewing the literature, analyzing data, writing manuscripts, and preparing articles for publication. While interest in AI is growing rapidly, there is still limited information on how these tools are actually perceived and used by leading medical researchers. This study aims to better understand the attitudes, perceptions, and self-reported uses of artificial intelligence among corresponding authors who have published in six major international medical journals. These authors play a key role in shaping scientific standards and editorial practices, and their views are essential to understanding how AI may influence the future of medical research. Participants are invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire that asks about their familiarity with AI tools, how and when they use or plan to use them in the research process, the potential benefits they perceive, and the concerns or limitations they identify. The survey also explores participants' expectations regarding transparency, ethical guidance, and journal policies related to the use of artificial intelligence in scientific work.The study is observational and does not involve any medical intervention or collection of personal or health-related data. Participation is voluntary, and responses are fully anonymous.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors Survey Group | This label identifies the single cohort of participants, consisting of corresponding authors invited to complete the anonymous online survey. No comparison or control groups are included. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| observational survey | Other | This is an observational, non-interventional study based on an anonymous online questionnaire. No intervention is administered to participants. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported attitudes regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process | Participants report their attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process through multiple-choice and Likert-scale items. Responses are analyzed descriptively; higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence. | At the inclusion |
| Perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process | Participants report their attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process through multiple-choice and Likert-scale items. Responses are analyzed descriptively; higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence. | At the inclusion |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported patterns of use, regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing | Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population consists of corresponding authors who have published scientific articles in leading international medical journals. Participants are identified through publicly available publication data from six major journals (The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, and The BMJ) and are invited to participate via professional email addresses. The population includes adult researchers from diverse biomedical and medical disciplines, with no geographic restriction.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de NICE | Nice | Alpes Maritimes | 06000 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| At the inclusion |
| Perceived benefits regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing | Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations | At the inclusion |
| Risk regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing | Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations | At the inclusion |
| Expectations regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing | Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations | At the inclusion |