Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia | UNKNOWN |
| ProMotion Prosthetics, Moorabbin, Australia | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
The CYBORG Study is a first-in-human clinical investigation evaluating the safety and performance of the Phantom X System, an implantable electromyography (EMG) sensor array designed to provide control of upper-limb prostheses. The study will assess surgical feasibility, device function, signal quality, and the system's ability to support intuitive prosthetic control during functional tasks. Participants will undergo implantation of the Phantom X sensors and complete a series of in-clinic visits to assess functional performance of the Phantom X system. Patient-reported outcomes will also be collected at various timepoints.
This early-feasibility study will evaluate the safety and functional performance of the Phantom X Implantable EMG Sensor System in individuals with unilateral transradial amputation and wrist disarticulation. The system consists of an implanted EMG sensor array, an implanted telemetry module, and an external wearable interface that provides real-time muscle signals to a myoelectric prosthesis.
The study follows a prospective, single-arm, open label design. Participants will undergo surgical implantation followed by device activation, calibration, and integration with a compatible prosthetic hand. Study procedures include periodic assessments of EMG signal quality, standardized functional assessments, and patient reported outcomes including quality of life measures and user experience. Safety will be monitored through adverse-event reporting and system performance checks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phantom X | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phantom X multielectrode EMG sensor array implant for upper limb prosthesis control | Device | Participants receive the Phantom X implantable EMG sensor array and telemetry module to enable myoelectric control of an upper-limb prosthesis. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety of Phantom X system during the implantation procedure, peri-procedurally, and 9 weeks thereafter | Safety is characterized by collecting device and procedure related adverse events during device implantation and 9-week study follow-up. | 9 weeks |
| Functionality of Phantom X system using standardized Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC) instrument | Average and standard deviation of ACMC scores will be computed for all participants | 9 weeks |
| Functionality of Phantom X system using standardized Targeted Box and Blocks Test (tBBT) instrument | Average and standard deviation of tBBT scores will be computed for all participants | 9 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety of Phantom X system during the implantation procedure, peri-procedurally, and 21 weeks thereafter | Safety is characterized by collecting device and procedure related adverse events during device implantation and 21-week study follow-up. | 21 weeks |
| Functionality of Phantom X system using standardized Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC) instrument |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinod Sharma, PhD | Contact | +1 512-763-0152 | vinod@phantomneuro.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Lo, MBBS, FRACS, BSc (Hons) | Cabrini Private Hospital, Malvern, Australia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cabrini Health Ltd | Recruiting | Malvern | Victoria | 3189 | Australia |
We may not share IPD because of concerns about protecting participants' privacy and confidentiality. Even though our participant data would be de-identified, there is a risk (especially with sensitive, rare, or detailed clinical data as would be the case for amputees in our study) that the individuals could be re-identified. Maintaining confidentiality and minimizing potential harm to participants may outweigh the benefits of data sharing.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Average and standard deviation of ACMC scores will be computed for all participants |
| 21 weeks |
| Functionality of Phantom X system using standardized Targeted Box and Blocks Test (tBBT) instrument | Average and standard deviation of tBBT scores will be computed for all participants | 21 weeks |
| Phantom X Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) | Characterize signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of electromyography (EMG) signals obtained using Phantom X system. Average and standard deviation of SNR for all participants will be computed | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| Phantom X algorithm gesture accuracy | Classification accuracy of the Phantom X algorithm will be computed based on the number of correctly and incorrectly classified gestures and reported as a percentage | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| Phantom X at-home wear duration | Average and standard deviation of at-home prosthesis wear duration for all participants will be computed | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| At-home limb usage pattern using Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data | Active and inactive durations in hours per day for each limb will be computed for each participant | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| Prosthesis control resolution | Resolution of Phantom X control system for controlling a myoelectric hand prosthesis will be characterized using Myoelectric Control Resolution Assessment (MCRA) instrument | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| Number of system recalibration events | Number of Phantom X recalibrations per participant will be collected and used to compute average and standard deviation of recalibration events for all participants | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| User Satisfaction | User Satisfaction with Phantom X system is characterized using following three standardized instruments: modified version of Orthotics Prosthetics User Survey (mOPUS, range: 0-100, Higher score is better), 5-level Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L, Higher score is better), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM, range:1-10, Higher score is better), and a study User Satisfaction Survey. | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| Robustness of Phantom X system | Robustness of Phantom X system is characterized by recording problematic activities of daily living (REC-ADL) that participants have problem performing with their baseline myoelectric control system. | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| Phantom X ease of use | Ease of use and intuitiveness of Phantom X system is characterized using NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) instrument. | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| Phantom Limb Pain | Change in phantom limb pain is characterized post implant and compared with baseline using Questionnaire for Post-Amputation Pain (Q-PAP). | 9 weeks and 21 weeks |
| ProMotion Prosthetics Pty Ltd | Recruiting | Moorabbin | Victoria | 3189 | Australia |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided