Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objectives of this study are to compare the levels of interoceptive awareness and self-reported function pre and post completion of an occupational therapy treatment plan. The target population are adolescents aged 11-21 years that are diagnosed with chronic pain and are seen through the Pain Team at Connecticut Children's. The primary aims are:
Background:
There has been an increasing number of adolescents with chronic pain who have been referred to pain team and to occupational therapy (OT) for intervention. The investigators on this study have been using the multifaceted intervention of yoga to treat this complex impairment. The main objectives of this study are to compare the level of interoceptive awareness and self-reported function pre and post completion of an occupational therapy treatment plan. The target population are adolescents, aged 11-21 years, that are diagnosed with chronic pain and are seen through the pain team at Connecticut Children's. Data will be collected pre and post occupational therapy treatment plan through use of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) to look at possible changes in interoception and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to look at possible changes in function. Interoception is the 8th sensory system or the sense of internal bodily signals and interoceptive awareness is the ability to be aware of and respond to these sensations. The areas of function on the PROMIS are Physical Function, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Peer Relationships/Social Roles and Activities, and Pain Interference. These participants will also complete a 4 question 3 month follow up survey. The participants in the study are a convenience sample of patients referred to therapy services from Pain Team visit.
Study Procedures:
Study Participants
Data Collection and Management:
Allison Fell OTR/L and Samantha DeFrancesco OTR/L will oversee data management.
Patient confidentiality statement:
Strict measures will be required for respecting and maintaining patient confidentiality. Collection of a patient identifier including medical record numbers and the patients name is necessary to ensure comprehensive inclusion of eligible subjects and accurate linking of data from different data sets. The database used for the study will be password protected and stored in REDCap. Once the study investigators have collected all the data, the data set will be frozen for analysis. At this time, the study investigators will completely de-identify all subjects. Medical record numbers as well as the patient's names will be removed and patients will be referred to by study number only. De-identification will take place once the study investigators have collected all data. The study investigators expect that these measures will minimize any risk to confidentiality very effectively, and that any unavoidable residual risk will be balanced generously by the potential benefit to society of the knowledge that will be obtained through this research.
Sample Size Justification:
For participant change the investigators will need 34 OT completers to provide ≥80% power for 0.5 Standard Deviation (SD) improvement.
Feasibility, Accrual, and Expected Duration of Accrual:
Over 200 new patients were referred to pain team last year in 2024. The study investigators plan to recruit as many of these patients that meet criteria to achieve a medium effect sample size within a 12-month duration.
Study Limitations:
There are several limitations anticipated with this study. These limitations include a small sample size from a single institution, no control group, and potential bias with patient selection.
Use of Study Results:
The outcomes of this study will be used to assist in quality improvement within the department and guide future research questions. The investigators plan to publish results in a peer-reviewed publication and to present the findings at a conference.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Group | Participants who are diagnosed with a form of chronic pain and are referred for occupational therapy treatment services. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupational Therapy | Other | Participants will receive an occupational therapy treatment plan of care that includes yoga for 8-12 weekly visits. They will complete pre and post questionnaires to measure their interoceptive awareness and function. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Profile GenPop v.3 | For ages 8-17. The PROMIS is a system that measures how patients feel and function in terms of their physical, mental, and social health. It measures pain, fatigue, physical functioning, emotional distress, and social role participation. PROMIS uses a series of questions to assess how patients feel and what they are able to do. It is a total of 36 questions with a collection of 5- and 6-item short forms assessing anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, pain interference, physical function-mobility, and peer relationships, as well as a single pain intensity item. For most PROMIS instruments, a score of 50 is the average for the United States general population with a standard deviation (SD) of 10 because calibration testing was performed on a large sample of the general population. The T-score is provided with an error term. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. A PROMIS score includes a T-score and a standard error (SE). | Assessment administered at the first therapy treatment visit and last treatment visit within a 4 month time frame. |
| Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-43 Profile v2.1 | For ages 18+. The PROMIS is a system that measures how patients feel and function in terms of their physical, mental, and social health. It measures pain, fatigue, physical functioning, emotional distress, and social role participation. PROMIS uses a series of questions to assess how patients feel and what they are able to do. It is a total of 43 questions with a collection of 6-item short forms assessing anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities as well as a single pain intensity item. For most PROMIS instruments, a score of 50 is the average for the United States general population with a standard deviation (SD) of 10 because calibration testing was performed on a large sample of the general population. The T-score is provided with an error term. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. A PROMIS score includes a T-score and a standard error (SE). | Assessment administered at the first therapy treatment visit and last treatment visit within a 4 month time frame. |
| Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness- Version 2 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Month Follow-up Survey | 4 question survey to assess participant continued use of strategies learned in therapy. | Survey will be sent out to study group participants 3 months after their last occupational therapy treatment visit. |
Not provided
Study Group:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Participants for this study are patients seen within the Pain Team Clinic at Connecticut Children's. They are adolescents aged 11-21 years old that are diagnosed with a form of chronic pain and are referred for occupational therapy services.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allison Fell, BS | Contact | 8608377331 | IAandFunctionStudy@connecticutchildrens.org | |
| Samantha DeFrancesco, MOT | Contact | 8608377331 | IAandFunctionStudy@connecticutchildrens.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Allison Fell, BS | Connecticut Children's Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut Children's Medical Center | Recruiting | Hartford | Connecticut | 06106 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38743558 | Background | Chambers CT, Dol J, Tutelman PR, Langley CL, Parker JA, Cormier BT, Macfarlane GJ, Jones GT, Chapman D, Proudfoot N, Grant A, Marianayagam J. The prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review update and meta-analysis. Pain. 2024 Oct 1;165(10):2215-2234. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003267. Epub 2024 May 15. | |
| 19096369 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009788 | Occupational Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
For ages 18+. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness is a patient reported questionnaire with 37-items to measure multiple dimensions of interoception (body awareness) through an 8-subscale state-trait questionnaire. The areas this assessment measures are noticing, non-distracting, not worrying, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, body listening, and trust. Scoring: Scores are between 0 and 5, where higher score equates to more awareness of bodily sensation. A percentile is also calculated, indicating how the responded scored in comparison to a normative sample. Interpretation using percentiles helps contextualize scores. For example, percentile below 50 indicate that the individual scored below what is typical. Extreme percentile scores (below 10 or above 90) are of particular clinical significance. |
| Assessment administered at the first therapy treatment visit and last treatment visit within a 4 month time frame. |
| Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness- Youth | For ages 7-17. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness is a patient reported questionnaire with 32-items to measure multiple dimensions of interoception (body awareness) through an 8-scale state-trait questionnaire. The areas this assessment measures are noticing, non-distracting, not worrying, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, body listening, and trust. Scoring: Scores are between 0 and 5, where higher score equates to more awareness of bodily sensation. A percentile is also calculated, indicating how the responded scored in comparison to a normative sample. Interpretation using percentiles helps contextualize scores. For example, percentile below 50 indicate that the individual scored below what is typical. Extreme percentile scores (below 10 or above 90) are of particular clinical significance. | Assessment administered at the first therapy treatment visit and last treatment visit within a 4 month time frame. |
| Craig AD. How do you feel--now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jan;10(1):59-70. doi: 10.1038/nrn2555. |
| 12829527 | Background | Eccleston C, Malleson P. Managing chronic pain in children and adolescents. We need to address the embarrassing lack of data for this common problem. BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1408-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1408. No abstract available. |
| 22864296 | Background | Evans S, Moieni M, Sternlieb B, Tsao JC, Zeltzer LK. Yoga for youth in pain: the UCLA pediatric pain program model. Holist Nurs Pract. 2012 Sep-Oct;26(5):262-71. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0b013e318263f2ed. |
| 38169051 | Background | Gnall KE, Sinnott SM, Laumann LE, Park CL, David A, Emrich M. Changes in Interoception in Mind-body Therapies for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Behav Med. 2024 Dec;31(6):833-847. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10249-z. Epub 2024 Jan 2. |
| 33021565 | Background | Hechler T. Altered interoception and its role for the co-occurrence of chronic primary pain and mental health problems in children. Pain. 2021 Mar 1;162(3):665-671. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002099. No abstract available. |
| 38244898 | Background | Horsburgh A, Summers SJ, Lewis A, Keegan RJ, Flood A. The Relationship Between Pain and Interoception: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2024 Jul;25(7):104476. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.01.341. Epub 2024 Jan 18. |
| 32030022 | Background | Kempert H. The Use of Yoga as a Group Intervention for Pediatric Chronic Pain Rehabilitation: Exploring Qualitative and Quantitative Outcomes. Int J Yoga. 2020 Jan-Apr;13(1):55-61. doi: 10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_13_19. |
| 29884281 | Background | Khalsa SS, Adolphs R, Cameron OG, Critchley HD, Davenport PW, Feinstein JS, Feusner JD, Garfinkel SN, Lane RD, Mehling WE, Meuret AE, Nemeroff CB, Oppenheimer S, Petzschner FH, Pollatos O, Rhudy JL, Schramm LP, Simmons WK, Stein MB, Stephan KE, Van den Bergh O, Van Diest I, von Leupoldt A, Paulus MP; Interoception Summit 2016 participants. Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Jun;3(6):501-513. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 28. |
| 26919395 | Background | Khalsa SB, Butzer B. Yoga in school settings: a research review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Jun;1373(1):45-55. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13025. Epub 2016 Feb 25. |
| 36699990 | Background | Koechlin H, Donado C, Locher C, Kossowsky J, Lionetti F, Pluess M. Sensory processing sensitivity in adolescents reporting chronic pain: an exploratory study. Pain Rep. 2023 Jan 6;8(1):e1053. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001053. eCollection 2023 Jan. |
| 39751180 | Background | Lucas JW, Sohi I. Chronic Pain and High-impact Chronic Pain in U.S. Adults, 2023. NCHS Data Brief. 2024 Oct;(518):CS355235. doi: 10.15620/cdc/169630. |
| 28080970 | Background | Mehling W. Differentiating attention styles and regulatory aspects of self-reported interoceptive sensibility. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 19;371(1708):20160013. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0013. Epub 2016 Oct 10. |
| 30513087 | Background | Mehling WE, Acree M, Stewart A, Silas J, Jones A. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2). PLoS One. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):e0208034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034. eCollection 2018. |
| 32694387 | Background | Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, Keefe FJ, Mogil JS, Ringkamp M, Sluka KA, Song XJ, Stevens B, Sullivan MD, Tutelman PR, Ushida T, Vader K. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020 Sep 1;161(9):1976-1982. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939. |
| 26267010 | Background | Salaffi F, Sarzi-Puttini P, Atzeni F. How to measure chronic pain: New concepts. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;29(1):164-86. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 Jun 19. |
| D013812 |
| Therapeutics |