Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | OTHER |
| Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center | OTHER |
| Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if adding a template lymph node dissection (TLND) to the standard surgery for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) can improve patient survival and prevent the cancer from recurrence. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do patients who receive standard surgery with LND live longer without their cancer returning? Is adding LND safe, and how does it affect surgery-related complications? Researchers will compare the group receiving standard surgery plus LND to the group receiving standard surgery alone to see if adding LND is more effective.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical groups. Undergo their assigned surgery and recover in the hospital. Attend regular follow-up visits for checkups and scans for 5 years to monitor for cancer recurrence, with the possibility of long-term follow-up extending to 10 years.
Background: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), encompassing renal pelvic and ureteral carcinomas, is a relatively rare but aggressive malignancy of the urinary system, accounting for 5-10% of all urothelial cancers. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision remains the gold standard for treating non-metastatic UTUC. However, prognosis remains poor, particularly for patients with locally advanced disease, due to high rates of recurrence and metastasis. The role of concurrent lymph node dissection (LND) during RNU is one of the most debated topics in UTUC management. While LND is widely accepted in muscle-invasive bladder cancer for its diagnostic and therapeutic benefits, its utility in UTUC lacks high-level evidence. Current guidelines conditionally recommend LND for high-risk UTUC based largely on retrospective data, leading to significant heterogeneity in clinical practice. This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to definitively establish the clinical value of template-based LND in high-risk UTUC.
Objectives:
Primary Objectives:
Secondary Objectives:
Exploratory Objectives:
Methods:
This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. A total of 150 eligible patients with high-risk UTUC (cT2-4N0-1M0 or cT1N1M0) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two arms:
Experimental Arm (A): RNU + template LND Control Arm (B): RNU + removal of only radiologically or intraoperatively detected lymph nodes >1 cm Stratified randomization will be performed based on tumor location (renal pelvis/upper ureter, mid-ureter, lower ureter) and clinical nodal status (cN0 vs. cN1). Surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) will be at the surgeon's discretion, but LND must adhere to predefined anatomical templates.
Patients will be followed for up to 10 years, with regular imaging, urine cytology, and cystoscopy according to a standardized schedule. DFS, OS, and other survival endpoints will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Safety will be assessed via Clavien-Dindo grading and monitoring of adverse events.
Innovation:
This trial addresses a critical evidence gap in UTUC management by providing the first high-level, prospective, randomized data on the therapeutic efficacy of template LND. Key innovative aspects include:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNU + Template Lymph Node Dissection | Experimental | Participants in this arm will undergo Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU) combined with template Lymph Node Dissection (LND). The LND will be performed according to a predefined template based on the primary tumor location: renal hilum+para-aortic (left hilar and paraaortic) or renal hilum+para-caval (right hilar, paracaval, and interaortocaval) for renal pelvis/upper ureter; extended to common/external iliac for mid-ureter; and pelvic (common, external, internal iliac, and obturator) for lower ureter. The surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted) is at the surgeon's discretion. |
|
| RNU + Selective Lymph Node Resection | Active Comparator | Participants in this arm will undergo Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU) alone. No template lymph node dissection will be performed. However, if intraoperatively identified suspicious and radiographic lymphadenopathy (>1 cm in the short-axis diameter) are present, they may be removed for pathological staging purposes only. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template Lymph Node Dissection | Procedure | A systematic and anatomic-based lymph node dissection performed during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The dissection boundaries are strictly defined by a pre-specified template according to the primary tumor location: renal hilum+para-aortic (left hilar and paraaortic) or renal hilum+para-caval (right hilar, paracaval, and interaortocaval) for renal pelvis/upper ureter; extended to common/external iliac for mid-ureter; and pelvic (common, external, internal iliac, and obturator) for lower ureter. The goal is potential therapeutic benefit by removing nodal metastatic disease. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease-Free Survival (DFS) | Time from randomization to the first documented occurrence of disease recurrence (local, regional nodal, or distant metastasis), new urothelial carcinoma in the contralateral upper tract or bladder, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression, recurrence, or death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years. (Assessments: every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5.) |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Time from randomization to death from any cause. | From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years. (Assessments: every 3 months.) |
| Incidence and Severity of Postoperative Complications (Perioperative Safety) | A composite measure to assess the safety of the surgical procedures, including: Incidence and severity of postoperative complications graded by Clavien-Dindo classification. Operative time (minutes). Estimated intraoperative blood loss (milliliters). Length of postoperative hospital stay (days). | From the date of surgery until 30 days post-operation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Urothelial Tract Recurrence-Free Survival (NU-RFS) | Time from randomization to the first documented recurrence at a local site, regional lymph nodes, distant metastasis, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented non-urothelial recurrence or death, assessed up to 5 years. (Assessments: every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5.) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Prognostic Molecular Biomarker Expression Levels | Evaluation of prognostic molecular biological biomarkers (measured by transcript expression levels) through Bulk RNA-sequencing of prospectively collected tumor tissues. | Tumor tissue samples are collected at the time of surgery. Biomarker analysis (Bulk RNA-seq) is performed after sample accrual, with the analysis period extending through study completion (up to 10 years). |
Inclusion Criteria:
Signed written informed consent form (ICF).
Age > 18 years at the time of ICF signing.
Clinical diagnosis of unilateral Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) by imaging (enhanced CT or MRI) and/or ureteroscopic biopsy/urinary cytology, and scheduled to undergo Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU).
Clinical assessment indicating that the tumor and regional lymph nodes are completely resectable, with at least one of the following high-risk features:
Presence of at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST v1.1 criteria.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
Adequate organ function meeting the following requirements (without use of any blood components or colony-stimulating factors within 14 days):
Bone marrow function: Neutrophils ≥ 1,500/mm³, Platelets ≥ 100,000/mm³, Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL (5.6 mmol/L).
Renal function: Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL and/or Creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min.
Liver function: Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN, AST & ALT ≤ 1.5 × ULN.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shimiao Zhu, MD, PhD | Contact | +86 88328607 | zhushimiao@tmu.edu.cn |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Changyi Quan, MD | Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital | Recruiting | Tianjin | Tianjin Municipality | 300211 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36454803 | Background | Hsieh HC, Wang CL, Chen CS, Yang CK, Li JR, Wang SS, Cheng CL, Lin CY, Chiu KY. The prognostic impact of lymph node dissection for clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in patients who are treated with radical nephroureterectomy. PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278038. eCollection 2022. | |
| 38020529 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 20, 2025 |
Not provided
| Tianjin Third Central Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Selective Lymph Node Resection | Procedure | A diagnostic procedure performed during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). It does not involve a systematic template dissection. The surgeon will only remove intraoperatively identified suspicious and radiographic lymphadenopathy (>1 cm in the short-axis diameter). The primary goal is pathological staging rather than therapeutic clearance of a nodal basin. |
|
| Intravesical Recurrence-Free Survival (IFS) | Time from randomization to the first documented occurrence of new urothelial carcinoma in the bladder or contralateral upper tract, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented intravesical recurrence or death, assessed up to 5 years. (Assessments: cystoscopy every 6 months for the first 2 years, then as per protocol.) |
| Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS) | Time from randomization to death attributable to urothelial carcinoma. | Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of death due to urothelial carcinoma, assessed up to 5 years. (Assessments: every 3 months.) |
| Lymph Node Metastasis Map | The distribution and positive rate (pN+%) of lymph node metastases, mapped according to the predefined template dissection locations for different primary tumor sites (renal pelvis/upper ureter, mid-ureter, lower ureter). | At time of surgery (from final pathological report, approximately 4 weeks post-operation) |
| Nomogram for Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis | Development of a predictive nomogram for lymph node metastasis based on prospectively collected clinical data, CT radiomics features, tumor size/location, and lymph node characteristics. | Baseline clinical and CT radiomic data are collected preoperatively. Model development and validation are performed after data accrual is sufficient, with the analysis period extending through study completion (up to 10 years). |
| Bobjer J, Gerdtsson A, Abrahamsson J, Baseckas G, Bergkvist M, Blackberg M, Brandstedt J, Jancke G, Hagberg O, Kollberg P, Lundstrom KJ, Lofgren A, Nyberg M, Rian Martensson L, Saemundsson Y, Stahl E, Sorenby A, Warnolf A, Liedberg F. Location of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastases in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Prospective Lymph Node Mapping Study. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Sep 27;57:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.010. eCollection 2023 Nov. |
| 32473636 | Background | Li X, Cui M, Gu X, Fang D, Li H, Qin S, Yang K, Zhu T, Li X, Zhou L, Gao XS, Wang D. Pattern and risk factors of local recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2020 May 30;18(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01877-w. |
| 28152158 | Background | Zareba P, Rosenzweig B, Winer AG, Coleman JA. Association between lymph node yield and survival among patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract. Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(10):1741-1750. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30516. Epub 2017 Feb 2. |
| 35280720 | Background | Huang J, Qian H, Yuan Y, Cai X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Kong W, Wu X, Cao M, Huang Y, Chen H, Xue W. Prospective Clinical Trial of the Oncologic Outcomes and Safety of Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Extended Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection at Time of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 24;12:791140. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.791140. eCollection 2022. |
| 31830927 | Background | Zhai TS, Jin L, Zhou Z, Liu X, Liu H, Chen W, Lu JY, Yao XD, Feng LM, Ye L. Effect of lymph node dissection on stage-specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy. BMC Cancer. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):1207. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6364-z. |
| 21606972 | Background | Messer J, Lin YK, Raman JD. The role of lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Nat Rev Urol. 2011 May 24;8(7):394-401. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.78. |
| 21798659 | Background | Roscigno M, Brausi M, Heidenreich A, Lotan Y, Margulis V, Shariat SF, Van Poppel H, Zigeuner R. Lymphadenectomy at the time of nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cancer. Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):776-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Jul 14. |
| 31469641 | Background | Raza SJ, Miller C, May A, Davaro F, Siddiqui SA, Hamilton Z. Lymph node density for stratification of survival outcomes with node positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Can J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(4):9852-9858. |
| 34325582 | Background | Sato R, Watanabe K, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Motoyama D, Ito T, Sugiyama T, Otsuka A, Miyake H. Prognostic assessments in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical nephroureterectomy and systematic regional lymph node dissection. Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):354-357. doi: 10.1177/03915603211034943. Epub 2021 Jul 29. |
| 35623996 | Background | Piontkowski AJ, Corsi N, Morisetty S, Majdalany S, Rakic I, Li P, Arora S, Jamil M, Rogers C, Autorino R, Abdollah F. Benefit of lymph node dissection in cN+ patients in the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of NCDB registry. Urol Oncol. 2022 Sep;40(9):409.e9-409.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.015. Epub 2022 May 24. |
| 22248522 | Background | Fajkovic H, Cha EK, Jeldres C, Donner G, Chromecki TF, Margulis V, Novara G, Lotan Y, Raman JD, Kassouf W, Seitz C, Bensalah K, Weizer A, Kikuchi E, Roscigno M, Remzi M, Matsumoto K, Breinl E, Pycha A, Ficarra V, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI, Scherr DS, Shariat SF. Prognostic value of extranodal extension and other lymph node parameters in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol. 2012 Mar;187(3):845-51. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.158. Epub 2012 Jan 15. |
| 39817679 | Background | Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Jan-Feb;75(1):10-45. doi: 10.3322/caac.21871. Epub 2025 Jan 16. |
| 37124512 | Background | Cui Y, Lu Y, Wu J, Quan C. Benefits of lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma only located in the lower ureter: a bicentre retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 14;13:1115830. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1115830. eCollection 2023. |
| 35574295 | Background | Lee HY, Chang CH, Huang CP, Yu CC, Lo CW, Chung SD, Wu WC, Chen IA, Lin JT, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chen YT, Lin CM, Tsai YC, Chen WC, Chiang BJ, Huang HC, Chen CH, Huang CY, Wu CC, Lin WY, Tseng JS, Ke HL, Yeh HC. Is Lymph Node Dissection Necessary During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Clinically Node-Negative Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma? A Multi-Institutional Study. Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 29;12:791620. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.791620. eCollection 2022. |
| 35785156 | Background | Xia HR, Li SG, Zhai XQ, Liu M, Guo XX, Wang JY. The Value of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Node-Positive Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 16;12:889144. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889144. eCollection 2022. |
| 37801187 | Background | Dlubak A, Karwacki J, Logon K, Tomecka P, Brawanska K, Krajewski W, Szydelko T, Malkiewicz B. Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):1327-1344. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01460-y. Epub 2023 Oct 6. |
| 40201351 | Background | Li Q, Wei P, Kang Y, Li X, Zhang H, Yang J, Sun J. To explore the risk factors of lymphovascular invasion in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and construct a prediction model. Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 25;15:1568774. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1568774. eCollection 2025. |
| 26809456 | Background | Seisen T, Shariat SF, Cussenot O, Peyronnet B, Renard-Penna R, Colin P, Roupret M. Contemporary role of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):535-548. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1764-z. Epub 2016 Jan 25. |
| 28508102 | Background | Inokuchi J, Kuroiwa K, Kakehi Y, Sugimoto M, Tanigawa T, Fujimoto H, Gotoh M, Masumori N, Ogawa O, Eto M, Ohyama C, Yamaguchi A, Matsuyama H, Ichikawa T, Asano T, Mizusawa J, Eba J, Naito S. Role of lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: multi-institutional large retrospective study JCOG1110A. World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1737-1744. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2049-x. Epub 2017 May 15. |
| 29158169 | Background | Dominguez-Escrig JL, Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Bruins HM, Yuan CY, Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, Comperat EM, Gontero P, Lam T, MacLennan S, Mostafid H, Palou J, van Rhijn BWG, Sylvester RJ, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, Roupret M. Potential Benefit of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):224-241. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Nov 20. |
| 37014743 | Background | Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, von Deimling M, Laukhtina E, Kimura T, Shariat SF. Need for and extent of lymph node dissection for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated review in 2023. Curr Opin Urol. 2023 Jul 1;33(4):258-268. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001097. Epub 2023 Apr 3. |
| 15273542 | Background | Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. |
| 28457661 | Background | Soukup V, Capoun O, Cohen D, Hernandez V, Babjuk M, Burger M, Comperat E, Gontero P, Lam T, MacLennan S, Mostafid AH, Palou J, van Rhijn BWG, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Sylvester R, Yuan Y, Zigeuner R. Prognostic Performance and Reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization Grading Classification Systems in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A European Association of Urology Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):801-813. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 Apr 28. |
| 24754341 | Background | Kondo T, Hara I, Takagi T, Kodama Y, Hashimoto Y, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Omae K, Yoshida K, Tanabe K. Template-based lymphadenectomy in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a prospective study. Int J Urol. 2014 May;21(5):453-9. doi: 10.1111/iju.12417. |
| 26094807 | Background | Matin SF, Sfakianos JP, Espiritu PN, Coleman JA, Spiess PE. Patterns of Lymphatic Metastases in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma and Proposed Dissection Templates. J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.077. Epub 2015 Jun 19. |
| 40118741 | Background | Masson-Lecomte A, Birtle A, Pradere B, Capoun O, Comperat E, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Liedberg F, Makaroff L, Mariappan P, Moschini M, Rai BP, van Rhijn BWG, Shariat SF, Smith EJ, Teoh JYC, Soukup V, Wood R, Xylinas EN, Soria F, Seisen T, Gontero P. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Summary of the 2025 Update. Eur Urol. 2025 Jun;87(6):697-716. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.02.023. Epub 2025 Mar 20. |
| Nov 23, 2025 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Aug 20, 2025 | Nov 23, 2025 | ICF_001.pdf |