Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/24 | Other Identifier | Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Atelectasis frequently develops during and after general anesthesia due to factors such as anesthesia-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, reduced functional residual capacity, altered ventilation-perfusion matching, and surgical positioning. The development of atelectasis has been associated with postoperative hypoxemia and other pulmonary complications.
Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a reliable, radiation-free bedside imaging modality for the detection and monitoring of atelectasis. LUS allows assessment of lung aeration through standardized ultrasound patterns and scoring systems, enabling dynamic evaluation in the perioperative period.
This is a prospective, observational cohort study designed to compare the incidence and severity of atelectasis in patients undergoing surgery in the supine position versus the prone position under general anesthesia. Adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures will be enrolled. No experimental intervention will be applied, and all anesthetic and surgical management will follow routine clinical practice.
Lung ultrasound examinations will be performed at predefined time points after induction of anesthesia and before extubation. A standardized lung ultrasound protocol and scoring system will be used to assess lung aeration loss and detect the presence of atelectasis.
The primary outcome of the study is the difference in atelectasis detected by lung ultrasound between supine and prone surgical positions. The secondary outcome is the change in lung ultrasound scores over time.
This study aims to clarify the effects of supine and prone positions on perioperative atelectasis and to support the clinical use of lung ultrasound as a noninvasive monitoring tool in perioperative and anesthetic practice..
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supine Position | Patients undergoing surgery in the supine position under general anesthesia. | ||
| Prone Position | Patients undergoing surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in lung ultrasound-detected atelectasis between supine and prone surgical positions | Lung aeration will be evaluated using the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS), a semiquantitative scoring system assessing aeration loss in 12 lung regions. In the supine position, lung ultrasound assessment will be performed along: the parasternal line (intercostal spaces 1-4 and 4-8), the anterior axillary line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12), and the posterior axillary line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12). In the prone position, lung ultrasound assessment will be performed along: the paravertebral line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12), the posterior axillary line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12), and the anterior axillary line (intercostal spaces 1-6 and 6-12). Each lung region will be scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a total LUS ranging from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate greater loss of aeration and more severe atelectasis. Assessments will be performed after induction of general anesthesia and before extubation. | Perioperative (After induction of general anesthesia and before extubation) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The study population consists of adult patients aged 18 years and older who are scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia. Patients will be evaluated according to surgical positioning (supine or prone) during routine perioperative care.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| ÖZLEM KORKMAZ DİLMEN, PROFESSOR | Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine | Istanbul | Istanbul | 34320 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20851923 | Background | Bouhemad B, Brisson H, Le-Guen M, Arbelot C, Lu Q, Rouby JJ. Bedside ultrasound assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced lung recruitment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 1;183(3):341-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201003-0369OC. Epub 2010 Sep 17. | |
| Background | Tusman G, Böhm SH, Warner DO, Sprung J. Atelectasis and perioperative pulmonary complications in general anesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(2):229-240. PMID: 22156255. | ||
| 24662376 |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data will not be shared, as this is a single-center observational study conducted for a postgraduate thesis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001261 | Pulmonary Atelectasis |
| D008192 | Deception |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012919 | Social Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Background |
| Acosta CM, Maidana GA, Jacovitti D, Belaunzaran A, Cereceda S, Rae E, Molina A, Gonorazky S, Bohm SH, Tusman G. Accuracy of transthoracic lung ultrasound for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jun;120(6):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000231. |
| 27669555 | Background | Monastesse A, Girard F, Massicotte N, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Girard M. Lung Ultrasonography for the Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):494-504. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001603. |
| 24401163 | Background | Lichtenstein DA. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Ann Intensive Care. 2014 Jan 9;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-4-1. |