Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the acute effects of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises on proprioception, muscle strength, balance, and explosive power in young athletes. The study aims to determine how different stretching and exercise modalities influence short-term performance parameters.
The primary questions this study aims to answer are:
Do static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises have different acute effects on proprioception?
Do these interventions cause different changes in muscle strength, balance, and explosive power?
Researchers will compare the static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercise groups to determine which method produces greater improvements in the measured performance parameters.
Participants will:
Perform one of the three assigned exercise protocols according to a standardized warm-up procedure
Undergo pre- and post-exercise assessments, including:
Proprioception (measured with an isokinetic device)
Muscle strength (measured with an isokinetic device)
Balance (measured with a Y balance test and BESS balance test)
Explosive power (measured with the Sargent Vertical Jump Test)
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the acute effects of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises on knee joint position sense (proprioception), muscle strength, balance, and explosive power in young male soccer players.
Proprioception, the ability to sense the position and movement of joints, muscles, and tendons, plays a critical role in maintaining joint stability. Proprioceptive exercises are widely used among athletes to enhance performance and reduce injury risk. Stretching exercises, particularly static and dynamic techniques, are commonly integrated into warm-up routines to improve flexibility, joint range of motion, and neuromuscular function. However, direct comparisons of the acute effects of static stretching, dynamic stretching, and proprioceptive exercises remain limited.
In this study, healthy male soccer players aged 14-19 years, with at least five years of competitive experience, no knee pain in the past two months, and no history of knee surgery, will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned (block randomization) into three groups:
Static Stretching Group - A controlled-position protocol targeting the quadriceps, hamstrings, plantar flexors, and dorsiflexors, with specific hold durations.
Dynamic Stretching Group - A repetitive movement protocol for the same muscle groups, with gradual speed increases.
Proprioceptive Exercise Group - A 10-exercise proprioceptive training program performed on a BOSU ball, focusing on lower-limb awareness, postural control, and dynamic balance.
All groups will perform a standardized 10-minute warm-up on a cycle ergometer before their respective protocols.
Assessments will be conducted before and immediately after the intervention:
Knee joint position sense (proprioception) - measured with an ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer
Muscle strength - isokinetic testing of knee flexors and extensors using the isokinetic device
Static balance - Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) test
Dynamic balance - Y-Balance Test
Explosive power - Sargent Vertical Jump Test
The primary hypothesis is that proprioceptive exercises will produce greater acute improvements in proprioception, balance, and explosive power, while dynamic stretching may yield higher acute gains in muscle strength. Findings from this study are expected to inform evidence-based warm-up and training strategies for young soccer players.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprioception group | Experimental | The group that received proprioception exercises |
|
| Dynamic tension group | Experimental | The group that received dynamic stretching exercises |
|
| Static tension group | Experimental | The group that received static stretching exercises |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static Stretching Exercise Group | Other | Our exercise group where we applied the static stretching protocol |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Knee Joint Position Sense Error (degrees) | Angular joint position matching error (degrees) measured using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer with passive reproduction of target angles. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Peak Torque during Knee Extension (Nm) | Peak torque (Nm) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Torque during Knee Flexion (Nm) | Peak torque (Nm) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Total Work during Knee Extension (J) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Male
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Neslihan ALTUNTAŞ YILMAZ E Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Doctor | Necmettin Erbakan University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tümosan Konyaspor Facilities | Konya | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38965588 | Result | Yilmaz O, Soylu Y, Erkmen N, Kaplan T, Batalik L. Effects of proprioceptive training on sports performance: a systematic review. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul 4;16(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00936-z. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Dynamic Stretching Exercise Group | Other | Our exercise group where we applied the dynamic stretching protocol |
|
|
| Proprioceptive Exercise Group | Other | Proprioceptive Exercise Program |
|
|
Total work (J) produced during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s.
| Baseline and 1 day |
| Total Work during Knee Flexion (J) | Total work (J) produced during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Average Work during Knee Extension (J) | Average work (J) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Average Work during Knee Flexion (J) | Average work (J) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Maximum Work during Knee Extension (J) | Maximum work (J) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Maximum Work during Knee Flexion (J) | Maximum work (J) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Average Power during Knee Extension (W) | Average power (W) during knee extension assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Average Power during Knee Flexion (W) | verage power (W) during knee flexion assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Knee Joint Angle at Peak Torque during Extension (degrees) | The knee joint angle (degrees) at which peak torque occurs during knee extension, assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Knee Joint Angle at Peak Torque during Flexion (degrees) | The knee joint angle (degrees) at which peak torque occurs during knee flexion, assessed using the ISOMED 2000 isokinetic dynamometer. Testing was performed in concentric mode at 60 deg/s. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Y Balance Test Composite Score (percent) | Dynamic balance performance evaluated using the normalized composite reach score from the Y Balance Test (percent). | Baseline and 1 day |
| BESS Total Error Score (points) | Static balance performance measured using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS); higher scores indicate worse balance. | Baseline and 1 day |
| Vertical Jump Height (cm) - Sargent Test | Explosive lower-limb power measured using the Sargent Vertical Jump Test (cm). | Baseline and 1 day |