Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) is a long-lasting skin condition that causes painful lumps and infections. In severe cases, patients need surgery to remove the affected skin. After surgery, a wound dressing called a wound matrix is placed over the area to help the skin heal.
This study will compare two different wound matrices:
Restrata®, which is the current standard treatment. Pelashield™ PainGuard™, a newer dressing that contains silver to reduce bacteria and lidocaine to help with pain.
The goal of this research is to find out if Pelashield™ PainGuard™ helps patients heal better after surgery than Restrata®. We will look at:
How quickly healthy granulation tissue (new healing tissue) forms How soon the wound is ready for the second surgery to apply a skin graft How often infections happen after surgery How much narcotic (opioid) pain medication patients need after surgery Patients who receive Pelashield™ PainGuard™ will be enrolled in the study going forward (prospective group). Patients who previously had surgery with Restrata® will be included through a review of their medical records (retrospective group). No additional procedures will be done outside of standard surgical care.
Standard of Care vs. Research:
Wide surgical excision for Hidradenitis Suppurativa at University Hospital follows a standard two-stage approach: excision with wound matrix placement (Stage 1) followed by debridement and definitive closure with ReCell application (Stage 2). Currently, Restrata® wound matrix is our standard of care.
Research Component:
This study compares outcomes between our current standard (Restrata®) and an alternative FDA-cleared wound matrix (Pelashield™ PainGuard™) to determine whether Pelashield is a superior product. The research involves systematic data collection and comparison; all surgical procedures remain University Hospital standard of care.
Wide surgical excision for Hidradenitis Suppurativa following University Hospital's standard of care is often complicated by postoperative pain and poor skin graft adherence due to underlying bacterial overgrowth. Restrata® and Pelashield™ PainGuard™ are both synthetic wound matrices with FDA 510k clearance for use in surgical wounds. Pelashield™ PainGuard™ contains antimicrobial silver and local anesthetic, which may reduce postoperative pain and infection compared to Restrata®, and may provide a cleaner, more robust skin layer for enhanced wound healing and improved adherence of skin grafts. Additionally, the lower cost of Pelashield compared to Restrata aligns with University Hospital's commitment to responsible resource utilization and financial stewardship.
Specific Aim: To evaluate whether Pelashield™ PainGuard™, when used in place of Restrata® for wide excision of hidradenitis suppurativa, results in reduced narcotic pain medication use, reduced time to second procedure, and improved skin graft incorporation at wound site.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelashieldâ„¢ PainGuardâ„¢ Group | Experimental | Procedures: Perform wide excision of HS-affected tissue Apply Pelashieldâ„¢ PainGuardâ„¢ to cover the surgical wound Place wound dressing and provide standard postoperative care instructions |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pelashield Painguard | Device | This is the only intervention being used in this study |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Opioid Analgesic Usage | Total cumulative opioid consumption during two distinct postoperative periods: | Period 1: After Stage 1 excision through day before Stage 2 closure (up to 8 weeks starting one day after surgery 1) Period 2: Stage 2 closure through 30 days post-Stage 2 |
| ReCell Skin Graft Incorporation | Percentage of the Stage 2 wound bed demonstrating successful ReCell graft take, reflecting the quality of granulation tissue and bacterial burden of the wound bed at time of grafting. | Assessment performed at 14 days (±3 days) post-Stage 2 during routine clinic follow-up |
| Surgical Site Infection (SSI) During Wound Bed Preparation | Presence of a clinically diagnosed surgical site infection occurring between Stage 1 excision and Stage 2 closure as defined by CDC criteria. | After Stage 1 excision through day before Stage 2 closure (up to 8 weeks starting one day after surgery 1) |
| Time to Definitive Closure (Granulation Readiness) | Number of days from Stage 1 excision to Stage 2 definitive closure (debridement and ReCell application). | After Stage 1 excision through day before Stage 2 closure (up to 8 weeks starting one day after surgery 1) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Non-Opioid Analgesic Use | Period 1: After Stage 1 excision through day before Stage 2 closure (up to 8 weeks starting one day after surgery 1) Period 2: Stage 2 closure through 30 days post-Stage 2 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neil Reddy, BS | Contact | 732-604-5296 | nr564@njms.rutgers.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Granick, MD | New Jersey Medical School | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital | Recruiting | Newark | New Jersey | 07103 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23145905 | Background | Leaper DJ, Schultz G, Carville K, Fletcher J, Swanson T, Drake R. Extending the TIME concept: what have we learned in the past 10 years?(*). Int Wound J. 2012 Dec;9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01097.x. | |
| Background | Wounds UK. International consensus. Appropriate use of silver dressings in wounds. Wounds UK. 2012;8(1):1-28. | ||
| 29209583 |
Not provided
Not provided
The findings from this study are intended to contribute to the scientific literature and will likely be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication or presentation at academic meetings. Participants will continue to receive all clinically relevant information about their own care and outcomes during routine follow-up visits, but they will not receive individual or aggregate research results unless they specifically request them after study completion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017497 | Hidradenitis Suppurativa |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017192 | Skin Diseases, Bacterial |
| D001424 | Bacterial Infections |
| D001423 | Bacterial Infections and Mycoses |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Background |
| MacEwan MR, MacEwan S, Kovacs TR, Batts J. What Makes the Optimal Wound Healing Material? A Review of Current Science and Introduction of a Synthetic Nanofabricated Wound Care Scaffold. Cureus. 2017 Oct 2;9(10):e1736. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1736. |
| 20526543 | Background | Matusiak L, Bieniek A, Szepietowski JC. Psychophysical aspects of hidradenitis suppurativa. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010 May;90(3):264-8. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0866. |
| 26631388 | Background | Ring HC, Sorensen H, Miller IM, List EK, Saunte DM, Jemec GB. Pain in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Pilot Study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016 May;96(4):554-6. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2308. No abstract available. |
| Background | Scuderi N, Alfano C, Paolini G, et al. Surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: evaluation of two methods and postoperative outcome analysis. Int Wound J. 2013;10(4):435-441. |
| 27340739 | Background | Kohorst JJ, Baum CL, Otley CC, Roenigk RK, Schenck LA, Pemberton JH, Dozois EJ, Tran NV, Senchenkov A, Davis MD. Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Outcomes of 590 Consecutive Patients. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Sep;42(9):1030-40. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000806. |
| 28639459 | Background | Alavi A, Lynde C, Alhusayen R, Bourcier M, Delorme I, George R, Gooderham M, Gulliver W, Kalia S, Marcoux D, Poulin Y. Approach to the Management of Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Consensus Document. J Cutan Med Surg. 2017 Nov/Dec;21(6):513-524. doi: 10.1177/1203475417716117. Epub 2017 Jun 22. |
| Background | Mehdizadeh A, Hazen PG, Bechara FG, et al. A comprehensive review of surgical treatment in hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(Suppl 1):S149-S164. |
| 22236226 | Background | Jemec GB. Clinical practice. Hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):158-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1014163. No abstract available. |
| D012874 | Skin Diseases, Infectious |
| D013492 | Suppuration |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D016575 | Hidradenitis |
| D013543 | Sweat Gland Diseases |