Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical trial aims to evaluate whether direct neurotization using fully autologous components during autologous breast reconstruction improves postoperative breast sensation and sensory-related quality of life in women undergoing unilateral mastectomy. Direct neurotization involves coapting the recipient intercostal nerve to an autologous nerve graft placed within the flap to facilitate reinnervation.
The study's primary questions are:
As secondary objectives, the study will assess whether biological predictors of nerve regeneration correlate with sensory outcomes. These include:
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either:
The study will compare these groups to determine whether neurotization accelerates or enhances the return of breast sensation over a 6-month follow-up period, with evaluations at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery.
Participants will undergo:
3. Intraoperative tissue sampling for NRG1 analysis and nerve morphometry. 4. Skin biopsy (if applicable) to assess intraepidermal nerve fibre density. 5. Breast morphometry assessment using a breast morphometry measurement software tool.
This study seeks to provide high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of direct neurotization using fully autologous components in restoring breast sensation and to explore biological predictors that may influence sensory recovery after autologous breast reconstruction.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Neurotized Group | Active Comparator | Participants assigned to this arm are women undergoing mastectomy who are eligible for standard autologous breast reconstruction without neurotization. |
|
| Neurotized Group | Experimental | Participants assigned to this arm are women undergoing mastectomy who are eligible for autologous breast reconstruction with planned direct neurotization using fully autologous components. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autologous Breast Reconstruction With Direct Neurotization | Procedure | The direct neurotization using fully autologous components procedures include:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Breast Sensation assessed by using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament testing | SWM thresholds at nine standardized points on the reconstructed breast will be measured using calibrated monofilaments, categorized into levels of normal touch, diminished light touch, diminished protective sensation, loss of protective sensation, and deep pressure only. | 1, 3 and 6 months after Neurotization |
| Patient's Quality of Life assessed by using BREAST-Q® Sensation Module | The patient reported outcomes will be recorded in BREAST-Q® Sensation Module to capture the sensation, breast symptoms, and quality of life impact of sensation loss. | 1, 3 and 6 months after Neurotization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Neuregulin 1 Expression | NRG1 expression quantified by ELISA from flap tissue | During procedure and 6 months after surgery |
| Nerve Cross-sectional Area | Nerve cross-sectional area measured via histomorphometry/histopathology using the recipient nerve of the direct neurotization method |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohamad Rachadian Ramadan, MD., MRBS. | Contact | +62881082855557 | rachadian@ui.ac.id |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dr. Ciptomangunkusumo National Hospital - Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia | Jakarta Pusat | Jakarta Special Capital Region | 10430 | Indonesia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38401421 | Background | Bubberman JM, Brandts L, van Kuijk SMJ, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. The efficacy of sensory nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction - Preliminary results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Breast. 2024 Apr;74:103691. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103691. Epub 2024 Feb 9. | |
| 27069510 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data will not be shared due to concerns regarding participant confidentiality and the potential risk of re-identification in a small surgical trial with detailed clinical and biomarker data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Autologous Breast Reconstruction without Neurotization | Procedure | Breast reconstruction is performed using autologous tissue without nerve coaptation or neurotization, according to standard surgical practice. |
|
| Measured during neurotization procedure |
| Breast Morphometry | Breast morphometry assessed using a validated AR/3D application | Before surgery and 1, 3, 6 months after surgery |
| Intraepidermal Nerve Fibre Density (IENFD) | IENFD quantified by counting PGP9.5-positive intraepidermal fibers per mm of epidermal length. Flap skin tissue samples will be taken using 3 mm punch biopsy | During procedure and 6 months after surgery |
| Timar B, Popescu S, Timar R, Baderca F, Duica B, Vlad M, Levai C, Balinisteanu B, Simu M. The usefulness of quantifying intraepidermal nerve fibers density in the diagnostic of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a cross-sectional study. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016 Apr 11;8:31. doi: 10.1186/s13098-016-0146-4. eCollection 2016. |
| 40506883 | Background | Samolis A, Troupis T, Politis C, Pantazis N, Triantafyllou G, Tsakotos G, Tegos T, Lazaridis N, Natsis K, Piagkou M. Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density as an Indicator of Neuropathy Predisposition: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 23;15(11):1311. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111311. |
| 35743534 | Background | La Padula S, Pensato R, D'Andrea F, de Gregorio L, Errico C, Rega U, Canta L, Pizza C, Roccaro G, Billon R, Dibra E, Meningaud JP, Hersant B. Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study. J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 16;11(12):3464. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123464. |
| 36467119 | Background | Song S, Parmeshwar N, Steiner G, Kim EA. Morphometric Analysis of Gender-affirming Breast Augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Nov 29;10(11):e4691. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004691. eCollection 2022 Nov. |
| 38413580 | Background | Bin JM, Suminaite D, Benito-Kwiecinski SK, Kegel L, Rubio-Brotons M, Early JJ, Soong D, Livesey MR, Poole RJ, Lyons DA. Importin 13-dependent axon diameter growth regulates conduction speeds along myelinated CNS axons. Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 27;15(1):1790. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45908-6. |
| 36166372 | Background | Clark IA, Mohammadi S, Callaghan MF, Maguire EA. Conduction velocity along a key white matter tract is associated with autobiographical memory recall ability. Elife. 2022 Sep 27;11:e79303. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79303. |
| 21368034 | Background | Fricker FR, Lago N, Balarajah S, Tsantoulas C, Tanna S, Zhu N, Fageiry SK, Jenkins M, Garratt AN, Birchmeier C, Bennett DL. Axonally derived neuregulin-1 is required for remyelination and regeneration after nerve injury in adulthood. J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 2;31(9):3225-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2568-10.2011. |
| 23222914 | Background | Stassart RM, Fledrich R, Velanac V, Brinkmann BG, Schwab MH, Meijer D, Sereda MW, Nave KA. A role for Schwann cell-derived neuregulin-1 in remyelination. Nat Neurosci. 2013 Jan;16(1):48-54. doi: 10.1038/nn.3281. Epub 2012 Dec 9. |
| 21551718 | Background | Dellon ES, Crone S, Mouery R, Dellon AL. Comparison of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments with the Pressure-Specifying Sensory Device. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1993 Jan 1;5(5):323-6. doi: 10.3233/RNN-1993-55602. |
| 31577663 | Background | Voineskos SH, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Pusic AL, Gibbons CJ. Giving Meaning to Differences in BREAST-Q Scores: Minimal Important Difference for Breast Reconstruction Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan;145(1):11e-20e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006317. |
| 35749737 | Background | Gallo L, Chu JJ, Shamsunder MG, Hatchell A, Patel AR, Godwin K, Hernandez M, Pusic AL, Nelson JA, Voineskos SH. Best Practices for BREAST-Q Research: A Systematic Review of Study Methodology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Sep 1;150(3):526e-535e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009401. Epub 2022 Jun 24. |
| 40264905 | Background | Ramadan MR, Rifai DA, Atmodiwirjo P, Panigoro SS, Mukarramah DA, Sobri FB, Jurisman A, Djohan R. Indonesian Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Apr 21;13(4):e6705. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006705. eCollection 2025 Apr. |
| 33538338 | Background | Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. |
| 35872020 | Background | Shiah E, Laikhter E, Comer CD, Manstein SM, Bustos VP, Bain PA, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Neurotization in Innervated Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Sep;75(9):2890-2913. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jun 17. |
| Background | Tecce MG, Desai AA, Christopher A, Cunning J, Rios-Diaz AJ, Morris MP, et al. 6. Breast Flap Neurotization After Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Trial. In: PRS Global Open [Internet]. 2022. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/prsgo |
| 40072353 | Background | Shyu S, Chang TN, Lu JC, Chen CF, Cheong DC, Kao SW, Kuo WL, Huang JJ. Breast neurotization along with breast reconstruction after nipple sparing mastectomy enhances quality of life and reduces denervation symptoms in patient-reported outcome: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3235-3247. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002331. |
| 40330161 | Background | Jagasia PM, Bagdady K, Jordan SW, Howard MA, Fracol ME. Meta-analysis of Objective Sensory Outcomes From 764 Breasts Shows Superior Sensation of Autologous Reconstruction With Neurotization. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 May 6;13(5):e6751. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006751. eCollection 2025 May. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016067 | Nerve Transfer |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019635 | Neurosurgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided