Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Combined With Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block Within the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) Program: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Combined With Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block Within the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) Program: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study
This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial within the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) program compares postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block versus ESP combined with superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) block in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.
Rationale: Effective multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia is crucial in cardiac surgery to enhance recovery and reduce pulmonary and cognitive complications. Neuraxial techniques (e.g., epidural) carry increased hematoma risk under anticoagulation; hence, fascial plane blocks like ESP and SPIP are safer alternatives.
Methodology: Randomized (ResearchRandomizer.org), 1:1 allocation, opaque sealed envelopes. ESP and SPIP performed under ultrasound guidance at standardized doses and locations.
Blinding: Patients and postoperative evaluators are blinded; block-performing anesthesiologist unblinded but uninvolved in assessment.
Follow-up: 0-72 hours after extubation with predefined time points for VAS, RASS, and Nu-DESC evaluations.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria