Surgeons frequently experience chronic spinal pain due to prolonged static postures and repetitive movements during surgical procedures. Exercise therapy is recommended, but it is unclear which type of exercise is most effective for this population.

This randomized clinical trial will compare Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT), also known as the McKenzie Method, with a structured program of generalized exercise in surgeons with chronic spinal pain who demonstrate a directional preference (i.e., movement in a specific direction that reduces symptoms).

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two interventions and followed for 26 weeks. The primary outcome is spinal pain intensity at 12 weeks measured on a 0-10 scale. Secondary outcomes include function, quality of life, and psychological factors.

This pragmatic trial is conducted in outpatient physiotherapy settings and aims to determine whether an individualized exercise approach (MDT) is more effective than generalized exercise in this occupational group.

Chronic spinal pain is common among surgeons due to prolonged static postures and physical demands during surgical procedures. Exercise therapy is recommended as first-line treatment, but the relative effectiveness of different exercise approaches remains unclear.

This study is a pragmatic, randomized, parallel-group trial comparing Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) with generalized exercise in surgeons with chronic spinal pain who demonstrate a directional preference. MDT is a classification-based approach that prescribes exercises based on symptom response to repeated movements, whereas generalized exercise includes strengthening, stretching, and endurance training without targeting directional preference.

Participants will be recruited from surgical specialties in Denmark and randomized 1:1 to MDT or generalized exercise. Interventions will be delivered by physiotherapists in outpatient clinical settings.

The primary objective is to compare the effect of MDT versus generalized exercise on spinal pain intensity at 12 weeks. Secondary objectives include effects on function, quality of life, and psychological factors.

The trial is designed to reflect routine clinical practice and to evaluate whether an individualized, classification-based exercise approach provides additional benefit compared with a guideline-based generalized exercise program.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 25-70 years
• Currently working as a resident, fellow, or attending surgeon
• Chronic spinal pain (low back, thoracic, or neck) lasting more than 3 months
• Demonstrated directional preference on standardized clinical examination (i.e., movement in a specific direction reduces symptoms)
• Sufficient proficiency in Danish to complete trial questionnaires
• Willing and able to attend treatment sessions at designated physiotherapy clinics
• Provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Serious spinal pathology (e.g., fracture, malignancy, infection, inflammatory disease)
• Cauda equina syndrome
• Significant neurological deficits requiring urgent medical attention
• Any diagnosed medical condition preventing safe participation in physical activity
• Sick leave longer than 6 months at baseline
• Pregnancy or having given birth within the past 3 months
• Scheduled for major surgery within the next 3 months
• Current participation in structured physiotherapy or spinal interventions outside the trial protocol

De-identified individual participant data underlying published results (text, tables, figures, appendices) will be made available no earlier than 12 months after publication of the primary results and for up to 5 years. Access will be granted for academic purposes to qualified researchers upon reasonable request and approval by the Principal Investigator. Data sharing will require a formal application and a data use agreement, and data will be provided through secure transfer.

De-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be available beginning 6 months after publication of trial results and remain available for 5 years.

Data will be shared with qualified researchers for academic purposes only. Access requires submission of a reasonable request and a formal application to the Principal Investigator. Approved applicants will receive de-identified data and supporting materials through secure data transfer.

Outcome assessors and statisticians will remain blinded to group allocation.