Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Backgroud: Radiation therapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy are the main treatment methods for patients with head and neck cancer, which often lead to many severe oral mucositis (OM). It is easy to cause dry mouth and infection, which seriously affects the comfort and quality of life of patients. There are many pharmacological and non-pharmacological mouthwash solutions in clinical practice, the purpose of which is to reduce bacterial accumulation in order to prevent and improve OM. Olive oil has powerful moisturizing, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. There is no research on the use of olive oil in the prevention or treatment of OM.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the preventive and therapeutic effects of olive oil as a mouthwash solution on OM caused by radiation therapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Methods: The research design of this study is a randomized controlled trial. Patients from a radiation oncology clinic of a regional teaching hospital in southern China were invited to participate in the study by intentional sampling. The study will be followed for 12 weeks and will collect data before and after treatment with olive oil mouthwash or standard care. Assessment tools include demographic characteristics, severity of OM (RTOG and OMAS), degree of dry mouth (XQ and Saxon test), pain severity(VAS), Shortened General Comfort Questionnaire (SGCQ) and head and neck cancer patients quality of life scale (FACT-H&N). The research data will be statistically analyzed by SPSS 22.0 statistical software, and the statistical significance is defined as the P value less than 0.05 as the significant level. Statistical methods include 1) Descriptive statistics include times, percentages, averages, standard deviations, etc. 2) Inferential statistics: Chi-square test, independent t-test, paired t-test and Logistic regression were used to compare the post-test data between the experimental group and the control group, and to detect the effectiveness of intervention measures and 3) Using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to predict the effect of interventions (repeated measures) on OM severity, dry mouth, body weight, quality of life and comfort scores.
Expected outcomes: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of gargling with olive oil in reducing the incidence of OM, severity of OM, severity of dry mouth, severity of pain, and improved patient comfort and quality of life.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| olive oil mouthwash | Experimental |
| |
| Standard care | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| olive oil mouthwash | Other | . The procedures and timing of the olive oil mouth rinse were as follows: A volume of 10 mL of olive oil was held in the mouth and used for rinsing for 2 minutes. Participants were instructed not to tilt their heads backward during rinsing to prevent choking. At home, the olive oil mouth rinse was performed as the final step of routine oral hygiene. If an antimicrobial mouthwash had been prescribed by the physician, it was used prior to the olive oil rinse. The olive oil mouth rinse intervention was initiated on the first day of radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and continued until completion of radiotherapy. Participants were instructed to refrain from eating or drinking for 30 minutes after each olive oil mouth rinse. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment severity of OM | The study will be followed for 12 weeks and will collect data before and after treatment with olive oil mouthwash or standard care. Assessment tools include demographic characteristics, severity of OM (RTOG and OMAS) | 12 Weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| degree of dry mouth | Assessment tools include XQ and Saxon test | 12 weeks |
| pain severity | Assessment tools VAS | 12 Weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
C. The total prescribed radiotherapy dose is between 6000 and 7200 cGy. D. Conscious and able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese. E. Willing to participate in the study after receiving an explanation, and capable of signing the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
A. Patients diagnosed with recurrent head and neck cancer undergoing a second course of radiotherapy or CCRT.
B. Patients who are allergic or have a history of allergy to any component of the intervention used in this study.
C. Patients who are unable to open their mouth due to skin grafting. D. Patients with known metastasis (M1). E. Patients who have already developed oral mucositis (OM). F. Patients with skin diseases, autoimmune disorders, or those deemed unsuitable for the study by the physician.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chiu-Feng Wu | Contact | +886-5-2765041 Ext. 2600 | 10480@cych.org.tw |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital | Recruiting | Chiayi City | Chia-Yi City | 60002 | Taiwan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were recruited from the outpatient radiology department of a hospital in southern Taiwan. This study employed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design in accordance with the research objectives. Microsoft Excel was used to perform random allocation, evenly assigning participants to either the experimental group or the control group. Matching was conducted based on age and cancer type to minimize differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups.
Not provided
Not provided
The severity of oral mucositis (OM) was assessed independently by two evaluators. The first evaluator, a physician, conducted direct clinical assessments of the patients' oral mucosa using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grading scale. The second evaluator, a hematology-oncology nurse, evaluated de-identified photographs of the patients' oral mucosa. These photographs were taken by the researcher using a specialized intraoral camera. Both evaluators performed the assessments independently and were blinded to the participants' group allocation to ensure objectivity.
|
| General Comfort | Assessment tools Shortened General Comfort Questionnaire (SGCQ) | 12 Weeks |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D013280 | Stomatitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided