Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to learn whether a handheld robotic device, called the HandX, can help surgeons safely perform a minimally invasive nipple-sparing mastectomy. This type of mastectomy uses a small incision at the side of the breast to remove breast tissue while keeping the skin and nipple in place. The goal is to lower scarring, improve comfort, and support good cosmetic results after surgery.
Participants in this study will already be planning to have a therapeutic or preventive mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction. All surgeries are done at Mediterraneo Hospital in Greece.
During the operation, surgeons use the HandX device to assist with the endoscopic dissection. Researchers will collect information about how long the surgery takes, whether the planned approach can be completed without switching to open surgery, and whether any surgical complications occur. They will also check healing, infection, and implant-related problems for up to 365 days after surgery. Participants will complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire before surgery and at several times after surgery to share their views on comfort, well-being, and cosmetic outcomes.
About 15 participants will take part. The results will help researchers understand whether this approach is practical and safe, and whether it should be studied further in a larger trial.
This is a prospective, single-center, single-arm interventional study designed to evaluate the feasibility and surgical safety of HandX-assisted endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. The HandX system is a handheld articulating robotic instrument that provides wrist-like motion, motion scaling, and ergonomic control. Unlike console-based robotic platforms, HandX integrates into standard minimally invasive workflows without the need for a large footprint, dedicated console, or complex docking procedures. Early clinical experience in other surgical specialties suggests that the technology may improve access and ergonomics during dissection while maintaining procedural efficiency. This study investigates its use specifically in endoscopic breast surgery, where instrument articulation and visualization are key technical challenges.
All participants will undergo the mastectomy through a single lateral mammary fold incision. Following tumescent injection and creation of a working space, a single-port device is placed, and CO₂ insufflation is used to establish the operative cavity. The HandX device is then employed for endoscopic dissection of the breast gland from the skin envelope and the nipple-areola complex. Specimen retrieval is performed through the same incision. Reconstruction is completed using implant-based techniques (prepectoral, dual-plane, PU-coated, or subpectoral), according to preoperative planning and standard practice. Axillary procedures (sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection) may be performed through the same incision when indicated.
The study focuses on technical feasibility-specifically, the ability to complete the endoscopic mastectomy using the HandX platform without unplanned conversion to an open approach. Technical success is defined in the protocol and includes completion of all key steps of the planned minimally invasive procedure. Adjunct use of standard laparoscopic instruments or minor incision extensions for specimen handling does not constitute conversion, provided that the minimally invasive workflow is preserved.
Safety outcomes include intraoperative complications, 30-day and 90-day postoperative adverse events, surgical site infections assessed according to CDC/NHSN definitions, implant-related complications, and implant loss through one year. Postoperative care follows standardized pathways for implant-based reconstruction, including consistent antibiotic and VTE prophylaxis policies and predefined criteria for drain management. Participants are reviewed at scheduled visits through postoperative day 28, with additional follow-up through day 90 for infection surveillance, and through one year for implant-related outcomes.
Patient-reported outcomes are assessed using the BREAST-Q® Reconstruction Module (Version 2.0), administered preoperatively and at postoperative months 1, 6, and 12. These measures provide data on satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial and sexual well-being, physical well-being of the chest, and satisfaction with aspects of care. Only implant-reconstruction-relevant scales are used.
All data are collected in electronic case report forms, stored securely, and managed in compliance with GDPR and institutional policies. Monitoring is internal due to the single-center pilot nature of the study.
The study plans to accrue up to 20 mastectomy cases, corresponding to approximately 15 participants, as bilateral procedures are counted per breast. The sample size of 20 cases is consistent with recommendations for feasibility studies intended to inform future multicenter comparative trials. Analyses are descriptive. Technical success, complication rates, and patient-reported outcomes will be summarized with confidence intervals. Progression criteria and stopping rules are predefined in the protocol, including thresholds for major complications, device-related serious events, and oncologic or surgical concerns that may warrant pause or termination of the study.
Findings from this pilot study will inform the development of larger controlled trials evaluating the comparative effectiveness, aesthetic outcomes, recovery profiles, and cost implications of HandX-assisted endoscopic mastectomy relative to other surgical approaches.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HandX-assisted endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy | Experimental | Patient cohort undergoing endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy with use of HandX. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy | Procedure | A minimally invasive nipple-sparing mastectomy performed through a single lateral mammary fold incision using endoscopic visualization and CO₂ insufflation. Breast tissue is dissected from the skin envelope and nipple-areola complex, and immediate implant-based reconstruction is performed according to standard practice. The HandX device is used for articulating endoscopic dissection. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Technical success | Completion of the planned procedure via the minimally invasive approach without unplanned conversion. | Intraoperative (Day 0) |
| Surgical Safety | Major (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) complications | Postoperative Day 0-30 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Operative Time | Total Operative Time | Intraoperative (Day 0) |
| Blood Loss | Intraoperative Blood Loss | Intraoperative (Day 0) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Female sex
Age ≥ 18 years old
Indication for therapeutic or prophylactic (risk-reducing) mastectomy for:
Breast volume: cup sizes A to C as defined by underwear size, expected implant volume <550cc and glandular ptosis not exceeding Grade I Regnault's classification.
ECOG / WHO Performance Status <2
Subject with signed and dated informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasileios Kalles, MD, MSc, PhD, FEBS | Contact | 00306973746477 | vassilis_kalles@yahoo.gr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vasileios Kalles, MD, MSc, PhD, FEBS | Mediterraneo Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mediterraneo Hospital | Recruiting | Glyfada | Attica | 16675 | Greece |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28692558 | Background | Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, Sances D, Negri D, Veronesi G, Rietjens M, Zurrida S, Luini A, Veronesi U, Veronesi P. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant: First Report of Surgical Technique. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397. No abstract available. | |
| 38384645 |
Not provided
Not provided
"Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. This study is a small single-center feasibility trial, and the dataset contains clinical and surgical details that cannot be fully de-identified under GDPR. Summary results will be made available in the ClinicalTrials.gov record after study completion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| HandX endoscopic instrument | Device | A handheld articulating endoscopic instrument used to assist with endoscopic dissection during nipple-sparing mastectomy. The HandX device provides wrist-like articulation, motion scaling, and ergonomic control during minimally invasive surgery. |
|
| Length of Stay | Length of hospital stay in days | From hospitalization to discharge (average 1-3 days) |
| Complications | 30-day complication rate (Clavien-Dindo) | Within 30 days after surgery |
| Skin flap necrosis | The presence of skin flap necrosis will be noted during all the visits after the surgery (POD 7, 14, 28). | Within 30 days after surgery |
| Nipple Areola Complex ischemia | Nipple-Areola-Complex (NAC) Ischemia noted during all the visits after the surgery (POD 7, 14, 28) | Within 30 days after surgery |
| Surgical Site Infection | Number of participants with SSI (CDC/NHSN). Superficial incisional primary (SIP) within 30 days; deep incisional primary (DIP) and organ/space (O/S) within 90 days after the index BRST procedure. | Within 90 days after surgery |
| Implant loss | Need to remove the implant for any reason | Within 1 year after surgery |
| Short - term Oncologic Adequacy | Negative surgical margins on final pathology-retroareolar (nipple) margin negative and no tumor on ink on any sampled skin-flap or deep margin | Within 40 days after surgery |
| PROMs - Aesthetic Outcome | BREAST-Q© questionnaire Version 2.0 measure the quality of life and satisfaction among patients undergoing breast surgery - Reconstruction module pre and postoperative, higher scores reflect a better outcome. | Preoperatively up to 4 weeks, 1 month postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 12 months postoperatively |
| Jain Y, Lanjewar R, Shinde RK. Revolutionising Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Robotic Innovations in Breast Surgery and Reconstruction. Cureus. 2024 Jan 21;16(1):e52695. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52695. eCollection 2024 Jan. |
| 27810700 | Background | Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 2. |
| 37787571 | Background | Khan MF, Kearns E, Cahill RA. Clinical Experience of a Smart Articulating Digital Device for Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Dec 1;66(12):e1265-e1268. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002987. Epub 2023 Sep 25. |
| 37870762 | Background | Mao R, Gao L, Gang W, Wen L. Literature Review of Handheld Articulating Instruments in Minimally Invasive Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Jan;34(1):47-54. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0366. Epub 2023 Oct 23. |
| 33861667 | Background | Cao L, Shenk R, Miller ME, Towe C. Minimally Invasive Mastectomy Could Achieve Non-inferior Oncological Outcome in Appropriately Selected Patients: Propensity Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Am Surg. 2022 Dec;88(12):2893-2898. doi: 10.1177/00031348211011152. Epub 2021 Apr 16. |
| 32042687 | Background | Mok CW, Lai HW. Evolution of minimal access breast surgery. Gland Surg. 2019 Dec;8(6):784-793. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.11.16. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| C562840 | Breast Cancer, Familial |
| D002285 | Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D000071960 | Breast Carcinoma In Situ |
| D002278 | Carcinoma in Situ |
| D018299 | Neoplasms, Ductal, Lobular, and Medullary |
Not provided
Not provided