Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a three-armed, multicenter clinical study evaluating the SureSmile clear aligner medical device. The primary objective is to confirm the safety and assess the accuracy of different tooth movements. In addition, the study will investigate and compare three different trimline designs: Scalloped, Straight, and Straight Extended.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scalloped trimline design | Experimental | SureSmile® Clear Aligner (Group 1) with scalloped trimline design |
|
| Straight trimline design | Experimental | SureSmile® Clear Aligner (Group 2) with straight trimline design |
|
| Extended trimline design | Experimental | SureSmile® Clear Aligner (Group 3) with extended trimline design (2 mm) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SureSmile® Clear Aligners | Device | SureSmile® Clear Aligners are Custom-made (EU)/patient matched (US) medical devices made to fit appliance with different diameters and lengths to accommodate subjects with different mouth shapes and sizes. This clinical investigation consists of three different trimline designs groups:
All pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment protocols and materials used in all groups are identical, except for the type of trimline design. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tooth movement accuracy at subject level across different movement types | The primary objective of this clinical investigation is to provide a detailed assessment of tooth movement accuracy at subject level across different movement types. For each patient, all teeth will be evaluated in five dimensions of movement:
Accuracy will be determined by comparing the predicted versus achieved tooth positions for 16 teeth in each subject using the formula: "Percentage of accuracy" =100 - [(|predicted-achieved| / |predicted|) *100]" Subject effectiveness is the overall mean of all the collected "Percentage of accuracy" values. | At start of aligner treatment and at end of aligner treatment according to predetermined treatment plan (end of aligner treatment is on average 6-18 months after aligner treatment start). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived comfort/pain | Perceived comfort/pain experienced by subjects will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with a Wong Baker face. | Every 8 weeks from start of aligner treatment up to to end of aligner treatment according to predetermined treatment plan (on average 6-18 months). Plus every 8 weeks during refinement period, on average 8-12 weeks. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject willing to participate in the clinical investigation, able to understand the intent risks and benefits of the clinical investigation as well as associated time commitment and follow-ups visits.
Subject has signed and dated the informed consent form (ICF) .
Subject aged 18 years or above at time of informed consent.
Subject has permanent dentition (i.e., all 2nd molars).
Subject with a dental malocclusion, consistent with Levels 1 and 2 case complexity and within the clinical references as defined in the SureSmile Case Selection Guide.
Intermaxillary elastics may be included within the treatment plan to support sagittal, vertical, or transverse correction within the limits defined under exclusion criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects unlikely to comply with investigational procedures, or unlikely to come back for follow-up visits, as judged by the Investigator.
Subject that presents a dental malocclusion classified as level 3 case complexity, as defined in the SureSmile Case Selection Guide.
Subjects who have completed aligner therapy within the last 12 months or who are in active orthodontic treatment.
Subjects with active periodontal disease or other unresolved dental conditions such as active cavities, active periodontal disease.
Subjects with treatment plans requiring transverse correction requiring expansion greater than 4 mm per arch or 2 mm per quadrant, or any skeletal transverse correction.
Treatment plans requiring sagittal correction exceeding a half-cusp discrepancy (i.e., >½ unit) in molar or canine relationships.
Subjects with treatment plans require vertical correction beyond Level 1 and 2 thresholds (i.e., overbite >3 mm or anterior/posterior open bite >1 mm), or vertical elastics exceeding 3 mm.
TMJ (Temporo-Mandibular Join) disorders or history of headaches or migraines.
Participants with known history of plastic allergies.
Subjects with presence of skeletal discrepancies necessitating orthognathic surgery, rapid palatal expansion, other orthopedic intervention, unilateral or bilateral cross-bites, mandibular deviations in association with the diagnosed malocclusion
The use of TADs (Temporary Anchor Devices), plates, other fixed anchorage ancillaries or the use of functional appliances (distalizers, growth modification devices), any approach involving orthopedic or skeletal sagittal correction or the use of hybrid fixed appliances are not considered part of the scope of this clinical investigation and these subjects are not eligible.
Uncontrolled para-functional habits, e.g., bruxism.
Any other condition that would make the subject unsuitable for participation, including but not limited to:
Known pregnancy at the time of enrolment.
Previous enrolment in the present clinical investigation.
Involvement in the planning and conduct of the clinical investigation (applies to both Dentsply Sirona personnel and the clinical investigation site).
Participation in another clinical investigation that may interfere with the present clinical investigation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freja Freedman | Contact | +46 702107415 | freja.freedman@dentsplysirona.com | |
| Ulrika Bonander | Contact | +46 706440844 | ulrika.bonander@dentsplysirona.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Costanzo Orthodontics | Recruiting | Fresno | California | 93720 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| SureSmile Clear Aligner Refinement rates. | SureSmile Clear Aligner Refinement rates aim to measure the number of refinements required among three different trimline groups. | At end of aligner treatment according to predetermined treatment plan (end of aligner treatment is on average 6-18 months after aligner treatment start). |
| Occurrence of Adverse Events, Adverse Device Effects, and Device Deficiencies during the clinical investigation. | Adverse Events, Adverse Device Effects, and Device Deficiencies spontaneously reported, and collection at each clinical investigation visit. | From Day 0 up to Retainer Delivery Visit, on average 18 months post Day 0. |
| Center for Orthodontic Excellence | Not yet recruiting | Princeton Junction | New Jersey | 08550 | United States |
|
| J Chichetti PLLC 2 | Recruiting | Huntersville | North Carolina | 28078 | United States |
|
| Brush 365 Dental | Recruiting | Frisco | Texas | 75035 | United States |
|
| Clinica Dental Ortiz Puigpelat | Not yet recruiting | Barcelona | 08028 | Spain |
|
| The Sanford | Not yet recruiting | Bexleyheath | DA6 8AA | United Kingdom |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008310 | Malocclusion |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided