Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Treatment Outcomes of Garlic Gel and Calcium Hydroxide as an Intracanal Medicament in Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment of Permanent Teeth.

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Treatment Outcomes of Garlic Gel and Calcium Hydroxide as an Intracanal Medicament in Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment of Permanent Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Researchers want to check how well garlic works inside permanent teeth as a medicament during root canal treatments. Garlic has shown to possess many helpful properties, like reducing inflammation, helping wounds heal, and antimicrobial characteristics. Because conventional medicaments can be expensive or have potential side effects, researchers are actively exploring natural options like garlic. Some lab studies have already shown that garlic gel can kill the microbes inside the teeth. However, no real-life clinical or X-ray studies have been done on using garlic in permanent teeth. This study may help scientists find a much safer and effective new material for dental treatments in the future.

Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of Allium sativum as an intracanal medicament due to its various useful properties, such as anti-inflammatory, wound healing action, and antimicrobial properties. To overcome the problems with synthetic medicament, researchers are looking for natural alternatives due to their low cost, easy availability, and safety. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic treatment outcomes of using garlic gel and calcium hydroxide paste as an intracanal medicament in nonsurgical root canal treatment of permanent teeth in terms of:

• Pain.
• Tenderness to palpation.
• Tenderness to percussion.
• Size of Periapical radiolucency.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with the physical status of ASA I and ASA II according to ASA classification.
• Patients aged from 15-45 years.
• Mature permanent single-rooted teeth with closed apices.
• Patients with clinical signs of symptomatic apical periodontitis (pain, tenderness to palpation, and percussion).
• Patients having radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency of endodontic origin.
• Patients who have not taken antibiotics for the past 14 days.
• Cooperative patients who show good compliance.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with physical status of ASA III, IV, and V according to ASA classification.
• Teeth with a calcified pulp chamber in periapical radiography.
• Patients who have undergone previous endodontic treatment failure and those with the presence of sinus tract on clinical examination.
• Teeth having advanced periodontal disease, with the basic periodontal examination (BPE) of 3 and 4.
• Presence of internal and external resorption of the root as viewed on the periapical radiograph.
• Presence of vertical root fracture and perforation as viewed on the periapical radiograph