The Effect of White Noise and Buzzy Use on Pain During Infant Vaccination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The Effect of White Noise and Buzzy Use on Pain During Infant Vaccination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two non-pharmacological methods-white noise and the Buzzy device-in reducing pain experienced by infants during routine vaccination. Infants are known to feel pain, and untreated or poorly managed pain during early life may lead to negative short- and long-term outcomes. Therefore, identifying effective, safe, and easy-to-apply pain-reducing strategies is essential for improving infant comfort and supporting evidence-based nursing practices.
Pain during routine vaccination is a common clinical challenge in infancy. Although short in duration, procedural pain can cause significant distress for infants and caregivers, and repeated painful experiences during early life have been associated with negative physiological, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Current guidelines from pediatric and neonatal organizations emphasize the importance of minimizing pain through safe, effective, and feasible strategies. Non-pharmacological methods such as white noise and vibration-cold devices (e.g., Buzzy) are increasingly recommended because they are simple, inexpensive, and easily integrated into routine clinical workflows. However, there is limited evidence comparing the effectiveness of these two methods specifically during infant vaccination.
This study is designed as a single-center, randomized controlled, experimental trial aimed at evaluating and comparing the effects of white noise and the Buzzy device on pain experienced by infants during vaccination. The study will be conducted at the Büyükçekmece Central Family Health Center in Istanbul, Türkiye, between October 2025 and October 2026. The target population includes healthy infants aged 0 to 6 months who are scheduled to receive the routine hexavalent vaccine (diphtheria, acellular pertussis, tetanus, inactivated polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B, and hepatitis B).
A total of 108 infants will be included based on a priori power analysis performed using G*Power software, assuming an alpha level of 0.05, a power of 95%, and an anticipated large effect size. To account for potential dropout or exclusions, 36 infants will be assigned to each of the three study groups: (1) White Noise Group, (2) Buzzy Device Group, and (3) Control Group. Randomization will be conducted by an independent statistician using stratified randomization based on infant age (2, 4, or 6 months) and sex to ensure balanced distribution across groups. The study will use a single-blind design in which the observer assessing pain scores is blinded to group assignment.
In the White Noise Group, infants will listen to white noise beginning approximately 1 to 2 minutes before the vaccination and continuing throughout the procedure. The device will be placed safely within hearing distance of the infant. In the Buzzy Group, the Buzzy device-providing combined vibration and cold stimulation-will be applied approximately 3 cm above the injection site starting 60 seconds before the injection and will remain active until the end of the vaccination. In the Control Group, infants will receive the standard vaccination procedure without additional intervention. All vaccinations will be performed by the same trained nurse to ensure procedural consistency. A parent will remain present for the infant's comfort and to assist in observing behavioral cues.
Pain will be evaluated using the validated FLACC Pain Assessment Scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability), a widely used behavioral tool suitable for infants and young children. During the vaccination, pain scores will be independently assessed by both a blinded observer (trained research nurse) and the parent. The total FLACC score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain. Sociodemographic data for infants and parents will also be collected using a structured introductory information form developed from relevant literature.
Data analysis will be performed using SPSS software. Normality of continuous variables will be assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Depending on the distribution, appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests will be applied. Between-group comparisons for FLACC scores will be conducted using ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test, with post hoc analyses performed where necessary. Descriptive statistics (mean, median, standard deviation, and percentages) will be used to summarize sample characteristics. A significance level of p < 0.05 will be used for all statistical tests.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether white noise or the Buzzy device is more effective in reducing pain during infant vaccination compared with standard care. Secondary objectives include comparing the relative effectiveness of the two methods against each other and evaluating factors that may influence pain perception, such as infant age and sex. By generating evidence on the comparative effectiveness of these widely available non-pharmacological interventions, this study aims to support the development of best practices for infant pain management in primary care settings.
The findings may inform clinical guidelines, enhance nurse-led pain management strategies, and contribute to the broader adoption of evidence-based, non-pharmacological methods in pediatric care. If shown to be effective, these techniques may be recommended for routine use during infant vaccinations to improve comfort, reduce distress, and support family-centered care. The study also seeks to raise awareness among healthcare providers and caregivers regarding simple, safe, and practical ways to reduce procedural pain in infants.
Inclusion Criteria