Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Protective diverting stomas are frequently constructed after low anterior resection or colorectal anastomosis to mitigate the consequences of anastomotic leakage, one of the most feared complications in colorectal surgery.
Both loop ileostomy (LI) and loop transverse colostomy (TC) are accepted methods of diversion. Randomized and observational studies have shown that faecal diversion significantly reduces the clinical severity of leaks and the need for reoperation compared with no diversion.
The choice between LI and TC remains controversial. Loop ileostomy is technically straightforward and associated with shorter operative time and fewer septic complications at closure. However, it carries specific risks, including high-output stoma, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal impairment, which may lead to hospital readmissions. Conversely, loop transverse colostomy is associated with fewer fluid and electrolyte issues, but has higher rates of prolapse, skin irritation, and wound complications at closure.
Meta-analyses comparing LI and TC indicate no clear superiority, with each approach demonstrating distinct patterns of morbidity. Some randomized trials have suggested lower major morbidity with LI, while others found no significant difference. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes and limited high-quality, adequately powered trials, further randomized evidence is needed to guide optimal stoma selection in colorectal surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| diverting ileostomy | Active Comparator |
| |
| transverse colostomy | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diverting ileostomy | Procedure | a surgical procedure in which the a segment of the ileum is mobilized and placed as a stoma diverting technique to protect any distal anastomosis |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinically or Radiologically Confirmed Anastomotic Leak | Count of participants in each arm who develop an anastomotic leak confirmed by clinical signs (such as fever, abdominal pain, peritonitis, or purulent discharge) and/or by contrast-enhanced radiological imaging. The unit of measure will be number of participants. | From index colorectal surgery to 30 days after surgery |
| Severity of Anastomotic Leak Assessed by Clavien-Dindo Classification | Distribution of Clavien-Dindo complication grades among participants who develop an anastomotic leak in each arm. The unit of measure will be number of participants in each Clavien-Dindo grade category. | From index colorectal surgery to 30 days after surgery |
| Number of Participants With Anastomotic Leak Requiring Surgical Management | Count of participants with anastomotic leak who require operative intervention, including re-laparotomy, laparoscopic washout, stoma revision, or creation of a new stoma. The unit of measure will be number of participants. | From index colorectal surgery to 30 days after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative Blood Loss During Index Surgery | Estimated volume of blood loss during the index colorectal resection and stoma creation, as recorded in the anesthesia or operative record. The unit of measure will be milliliters. | Intraoperative period of index surgery |
| Number of Participants With Postoperative Bleeding Requiring Transfusion or Intervention |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Adults ≥18 years undergoing elective low anterior resection or coloanal anastomosis for benign or malignant colorectal disease.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Patients with pre-existing stoma.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmed E T Mahmoud, bachelor | Contact | 00201019220327 | aet.mah1699@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed H Othman, Doctorate | Assiut University | Study Chair |
| Mohamed abulfetouh, Doctorate | Assiut University | Study Director |
| Ahmed G Hemdan, doctorate |
Not provided
age, brief medical and surgical history , lab investigations and any imaging done pre or post operative
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Diverting Transverse Colostomy | Procedure | a surgical procedure in which the a segment of the transverse colon is mobilized and placed as a stoma diverting technique to protect any distal anastomosis. |
|
Count of participants who experience postoperative bleeding after index surgery that requires blood transfusion, endoscopic hemostasis, radiological embolization, or reoperation. The unit of measure will be number of participants. |
| From index colorectal surgery to 30 days after surgery |
| Operative Time for Index Surgery | Duration of the index colorectal resection and diverting stoma creation measured from skin incision to skin closure. The unit of measure will be minutes. | Intraoperative period of index surgery |
| Length of Hospital Stay After Index Surgery | Duration of hospitalization in days for the admission during which the index colorectal surgery and stoma creation are performed, from the day of operation to the day of discharge. The unit of measure will be days. | Baseline |
| Assiut University |
| Study Director |