Two-site Blind Epidural Patch Versus Targeted Epidural Patch With Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma for Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Prospective, Assessor Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
Two-site Blind Epidural Patch Versus Targeted Epidural Patch With Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma for Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Prospective, Assessor Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a condition characterized by refractory orthostatic headache, mostly due to loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Epidural patch with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which contains numerous growth factors and cytokines, has been reported as a successful alternative for whole blood in dura repair. However, there is no report regarding the best approach to use: targeted epidural PRP patch (TEPP) versus blind epidural PRP patch (BEPP). Preliminary work has suggested that both targeted and blind approaches are effective when using whole blood for epidural patch. Furthermore, two-site blind approach could be considered as a viable initial treatment regardless of the identification of the leak for conventional targeted approach. In this study, the investigators aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of two-site BEPP compared with TEPP for the treatment of refractory SIH cases failing in conservative therapy.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
There was concern for other causes of intracranial hypotension, such as postdural puncture, postsurgical and post-traumatic CSF leaks.
Prior treatment with EBP at any time previously.
Any contraindication to epidural puncture, such as space-occupying intracranial or intraspinal lesions, spinal defect, suspected infection over the puncture site, bleeding disorder and current anticoagulation therapy.
History of drug and alcohol abuse, cognitive dysfunction, or mental illness.
Unable to comprehend the pain NRS.
Unable to cooperate with postoperative treatment, rehabilitation, and follow-up visits.