Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this prospective cohort study is to determine the factors that influence the progression of endometriosis and the quality of life of patients.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will follow up a prospective cohort of 100 patients diagnosed with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) +/- endometriomas during 2 years, collecting data regarding their ultrasound exam and their symptoms and quality of life at stablished controls at recruitment, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months.
This prospective observational cohort study aims to characterize the clinical and ultrasonographic progression of endometriosis and to identify the factors associated with disease evolution, ovarian reserve, symptom burden, and patient-reported quality of life. The protocol is designed to integrate longitudinal clinical assessments, structured transvaginal ultrasound evaluations, hormonal profiling, and digital monitoring through the validated mobile application "Endometric".
The study will follow a cohort of adult women with confirmed endometriosis for two years, using standardized evaluation intervals (baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years) to capture meaningful changes in lesion morphology, symptoms, and functional outcomes.
Ultrasound assessments will be performed according to the IDEA consensus (Guerriero S, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):318-32. doi: 10.1002/uog.15955) and lesions will be classified using the Enzian system (Keckstein J, et al. The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jul;100(7):1165-75. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14099), enabling precise measurement of endometriomas, deep infiltrating lesions, associated adhesions, and adnexal involvement.
Ovarian reserve will be estimated using antral follicle count and antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels, analyzed in a single specialized laboratory to minimize inter-assay variability. Clinical progression will be assessed through standardized symptom scales and the Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire (EHP-30). Participants will be managed with expectant, medical, or combined approaches according to routine clinical practice; treatments will not be randomized, but exposure will be precisely documented to evaluate its relationship with disease evolution.
The study functions as a patient registry with predefined longitudinal data collection and structured quality-assurance procedures. Data will be stored in a dedicated Clinapsis database with controlled access and pseudonymization through unique patient codes. A detailed data dictionary will define each variable, its source, coding strategy (including standardized terminology for medications and symptoms), and reference ranges for biological parameters. Automated data-entry checks will detect inconsistencies, missing fields, and out-of-range values at the point of entry. Additional validation procedures will include periodic cross-checks between electronic case-report forms and source data (ultrasound measurements, laboratory results, medical records). Source data verification will be conducted by authorized investigators to ensure accuracy and completeness.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) will govern all registry operations: patient identification and recruitment; informed-consent procedures; clinical and ultrasound assessments; biological-sample handling; data entry, monitoring, and auditing; management of adverse events; and change-control processes for any protocol modifications. The biobank procedures-collection and storage of serum, plasma, urine, and endometriotic tissue-adhere to institutional and regulatory standards, allowing future biomarker research on inflammation, interleukins, and miRNAs.
The planned sample size of 100 patients represents a pragmatic estimate based on available annual referrals and expected retention; although formal power calculations are limited by absent prior data, this cohort is considered sufficient to detect clinically meaningful trends and associations.
Missing data will be addressed through predefined rules distinguishing "missing," "not applicable," and "uninterpretable" entries, with sensitivity analyses planned to assess potential bias.
The statistical analysis plan includes descriptive analysis of all variables according to their scale, repeated-measures ANOVA to evaluate temporal changes across the four scheduled visits, and ANCOVA models to explore the impact of covariates such as age, baseline symptom severity, and treatment type. Comparisons between treatment groups will adjust for confounding when possible, acknowledging that therapeutic choice is not randomized. A significance threshold of 0.05 (two-sided) will be used. Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS v29 or later.
Monitoring and audit procedures ensure compliance with regulatory and ethical standards. Investigators will maintain study documents for at least five years, and authorized monitors, auditors, ethical committees, or health authorities may access anonymized source documentation for verification.
The project is supported by the Fundació La Marató de TV· (Reg 55/173, project 20241910), which ensures adequate resources for data management, sample processing, and technological support for the clinical-monitoring application.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Women diagnosed with endometriosis, referred for treatment and/or follow-up to Reference Unit | The study population consists of adult women (18 years or older) with a confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis based on transvaginal ultrasound showing clearly visible and measurable lesions (endometriomas or deep endometriotic lesions suitable for evaluation and follow-up), who are referred for a first consultation at the Endometriosis Reference Unit in Hospital Sant Pau. Patients must not have an expected indication for surgical intervention within the next two years, ensuring stable monitoring of disease progression and treatment effects. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound-assessed progression of endometriosic lesions at recruitment, 6, 12 and 24 months |
Outcome variable: PROGRESSION, STABILITY or REGRESSION. This result will be defined as follows:
| From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 24 months |
| Evolution of clinical presentation at recruitment, 6, 12 and 24 months |
| From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evolution of Ovarian Reserve at recruitment, 6, 12 and 24 months | Measures:
Outcome variable: OVARIAN RESERVE LOSS (YES / NO) Decreased ovarian reserve will be considered when AMH presents with a drop of 0.2 ng/mL annually, and/or if AMH if below 1 ng/dL at any time during follow-up, and/or AFC falls >=4 follicles anually. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Women who are referred to Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona) due to a clinical or sonographic suspicion of endometriosis.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RocÃo Luna Guibourg, MD, PhD | Contact | +34935537041 | rluna@santpau.cat | |
| Aina Delgado-Morell, MD | Contact | +34935537041 | adelgadom@santpau.cat |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau | Barcelona | Catalonia | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34405378 | Background | Vannuccini S, Clemenza S, Rossi M, Petraglia F. Hormonal treatments for endometriosis: The endocrine background. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022 Jun;23(3):333-355. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09666-w. Epub 2021 Aug 17. | |
| 29786828 | Background | Brown J, Crawford TJ, Datta S, Prentice A. Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 22;5(5):CD001019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001019.pub3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results will be shared in a deidentified format for research purposes.
Supporting Documents: Study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form will also be available.
IPD will be made available beginning 6-12 months after publication of the primary results and will remain accessible for at least 5 years.
Data will be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request sent to study IP.
Access will require a data-sharing agreement ensuring appropriate use, data protection, and compliance with ethical standards.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Blood (serum and plasma), urine. Endometriosic tissue if surgical exeresis is performed.
| From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 24 months |
| Evolution of Quality of Life (QoL) at recruitment, 6, 12 and 24 monts | - Quality of life measurement using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire (at first visit and follow-up). The EHP-30 consists of a core instrument which includes five scale scores covering:
Each item is answered as a categorical Likert-Scale (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always). It is a self-reported questionnaire which will be administered on paper support. | From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 24 months |
| 21071490 | Background | Vercellini P, Crosignani P, Somigliana E, Vigano P, Frattaruolo MP, Fedele L. 'Waiting for Godot': a commonsense approach to the medical treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jan;26(1):3-13. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq302. Epub 2010 Nov 11. |
| 35350465 | Background | Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, King K, Kvaskoff M, Nap A, Petersen K, Saridogan E, Tomassetti C, van Hanegem N, Vulliemoz N, Vermeulen N; ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline Group. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Feb 26;2022(2):hoac009. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac009. eCollection 2022. |
| 29787038 | Background | National Guideline Alliance (UK). Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2017 Sep. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK453273/ |
| 34899597 | Background | Koninckx PR, Fernandes R, Ussia A, Schindler L, Wattiez A, Al-Suwaidi S, Amro B, Al-Maamari B, Hakim Z, Tahlak M. Pathogenesis Based Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 25;12:745548. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.745548. eCollection 2021. |
| 20801404 | Background | de Ziegler D, Borghese B, Chapron C. Endometriosis and infertility: pathophysiology and management. Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):730-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60490-4. |
| 27710968 | Background | Perello MF, Martinez-Zamora MA, Torres X, Munros J, Balasch Cortina J, Carmona F. Endometriotic Pain Is Associated with Adenomyosis but Not with the Compartments Affected by Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82(3):240-246. doi: 10.1159/000447633. Epub 2016 Oct 7. |
| 29320327 | Background | Chamie LP, Ribeiro DMFR, Tiferes DA, Macedo Neto AC, Serafini PC. Atypical Sites of Deeply Infiltrative Endometriosis: Clinical Characteristics and Imaging Findings. Radiographics. 2018 Jan-Feb;38(1):309-328. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170093. |
| 22938769 | Background | Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Wattiez A, Donnez J. Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3):564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1061. |
| 32978068 | Background | Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Tahlak M, Keckstein J, Wattiez A, Martin DC. The epidemiology of endometriosis is poorly known as the pathophysiology and diagnosis are unclear. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Mar;71:14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 1. |
| 31488888 | Background | Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019 Nov;15(11):666-682. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0245-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5. |
| 23847114 | Background | De Graaff AA, D'Hooghe TM, Dunselman GA, Dirksen CD, Hummelshoj L; WERF EndoCost Consortium; Simoens S. The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey. Hum Reprod. 2013 Oct;28(10):2677-85. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det284. Epub 2013 Jul 11. |
| 33483970 | Background | Keckstein J, Saridogan E, Ulrich UA, Sillem M, Oppelt P, Schweppe KW, Krentel H, Janschek E, Exacoustos C, Malzoni M, Mueller M, Roman H, Condous G, Forman A, Jansen FW, Bokor A, Simedrea V, Hudelist G. The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Jul;100(7):1165-1175. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14099. Epub 2021 Mar 19. |
| 15541453 | Background | Giudice LC, Kao LC. Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004 Nov 13-19;364(9447):1789-99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004715 | Endometriosis |
| D018450 | Disease Progression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided